Wrong Result

[Narmer]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690407

Wrong category - Yonah in Northwood category

[mikiiioo]

What is about 1280/800 resolution in 3dm06??Is allowed?I know some screens can display 1280/800 only,but....this is not def.resolution for 3dm06

[Pepek86]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699378 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699396 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699282 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699407 no resolution

[lunatic@98]

What is about 1280/800 resolution in 3dm06??Is allowed?I know some screens can display 1280/800 only,but....this is not def.resolution for 3dm06

 

Than you need a second display/monitor

[Freakezoit]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675041 Screen shows an G92 GTS 512MB but ranked as 640MB!

[mikiiioo]

Than you need a second display/monitor

I'm talking about laptops

[intouch]

1 million marks to the aquamark bench !!! with an Opteron 146 and one 8600GT.

I want the same configuration.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699708

 

Same thing here but with only 100K marks but no verification link and the screen shown only a cpu-z screen !!

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699713

 

++

[mAlkAv!An]

i think it's just some kind of 'introducing' or testing new categories...dunno

 

same here: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699718

 

 

Edit: already removed

[intouch]

Sorry, I didn't know

[Sweet]

Plese Fix this wrong score:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547463 No screen, no verification , maybe fake ??

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547510 Idem

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569187 Idem

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=550039 Idem

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648583 No resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=562652 No screen , wrong verification link

 

 

 

Thanks

[MaXtoRZP]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079

Matched to wrong category. 12k/06 is toooooo high for 8600GT. Proof link is broken. Please block

[George_o/c]

Take a look at this P4 3GHz Northwood SPi 1M done by NoOsPhErE ...

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506020

 

It's the top SPi for that cpu category ... Now looking at it, it seemed really weird as F.O.G.N.A who has the second SPi 1M place ... He managed to get 30 seconds with the cpu at almost 5GHz ... But NoOsPhErE, managed to do 29 seconds with his cpu at only 4350MHz ... Isn't it a little weird ? Of course it is

 

Take a look at NoOsPhErE' s validation (well not validation, it's a link to forumpost ) ... This specific SPi 1M time was done with a Pentium D 830 @ 4350MHz ... It's a dualcore, and the ram is of course DDR2 ... http://www.techzonept.com/showpost.php?p=696467

 

How is that validation possible ? It's pretty damn obvious that he is using a different cpu, as it's also clearly stated in the link to forumpost ...

[knopflerbruce]

i think it's just some kind of 'introducing' or testing new categories...dunno

 

same here: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699718

 

 

Edit: already removed

 

I know Bwanasoft makes some "test scores" sometimes, to try out new rankings or something. Nothing to worry about:)

[mAlkAv!An]

I know Bwanasoft makes some "test scores" sometimes, to try out new rankings or something. Nothing to worry about:)

 

Yeah, that's what i thought (said)

[MaSell]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696941 - wprime 1.53

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696938 - wprime 1.53

[DopeLex]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936

 

=> no resolution, Settings not visible, unrealistic score for single 7800 GTX @ used Clocks.

 

Probably lower Resolution - because of this, the 3DMark settings are covered ! Please delete.

[mAlkAv!An]

Verification Links says Resolution = 1024x768

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667249

[Rossi]

3Dmark 2003 - 33453 marks - bonzo_catalin (crazypc.ro)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677577

Description: E6600 @ 3690 , single X1900XT @ 739/864

This is unreal score on 1900XT!! I sent report but has passed more month, but is not present the answer actions

Del this result.

[Rossi]

wPrime 1024m - 3min 56sec 980ms - kawal ("(Overclocker.es)")

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689818

wPrime 32m - 7sec 940ms - kawal ("(Overclocker.es)")

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689817

 

This is unreal result for one Xeon 3220. Special Xeon 3220 @ 2992mhz with Dell Inc. 0MY171!!

[bartx]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700212 - probably running SLI in single card category

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700214- probably running SLI in single card category

[Droperidolum]

fake or probably running SLI in single card category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694905

[Freakezoit]

Not fixed yet

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675041 Screen shows an G92 GTS 512MB but ranked as 640MB! Please Fix this

[zavlakas]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696941

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696439

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696938

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696428

wPrime 1.53

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698365

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698366

wPrime 1.34

[Patagonian]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592336 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650027 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656051 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610436 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark05, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610418 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark06, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing

[Ivan1981]

No resolution.Results are too high for this clocks of the card:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700531

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700532

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700536

 

Possible smaller resolution then default.