Jump to content

Submission & member moderation

Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...

  1. Started by rbuass,

    Hi friends! I posted a new score with a Aquamark (Gulftown). I don t want the Global points until the 980X is allowed, but HWBot removed my valid score. invalid score - no global points - ok http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/966042_rbuass_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_401001_marks valid score - but i have no my Global points http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/943810_rbuass_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_381018_marks I think the same with a 3dM05 score, but i am waiting. Sorry but i have no a good english (but i do my best to explain ) I will apreciate so much if you add my valid points Thanks for all

    • 2 replies
    • 690 views
  2. Started by oxyyy,

    Today i wonder why i've lost about 20 points... wprime 4x Core submission wpime 1x Core sumission hmm, sorry points are back...

    • 0 replies
    • 659 views
  3. Started by 1BadMoJoe,

    A shadow hunter http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678513_shadow_hunter_cpu_z_k6_2_533mhz_533.5_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678528_shadow_hunter_superpi_k6_2_533mhz_6min_35sec_200ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678527_shadow_hunter_pifast_k6_2_533mhz_722.83_sec This is a k6-2+ 500MHz in a k6-II 533 class, User accidently placed a K6-II+500MHz in an uncorrect catagory please confer to the CPU-Z ID (exibt1)Model"D" and (exibit2)EXT.model"D", the (exibit3)Level2 cache (exibit4)Name states it is a K6-III+ CPU (exibit5) instuctions list it having MMX 3DNow!+, This "rare" CPU does not match a common K6-II 533 CPU-Z ID. I think it is a K…

  4. Started by Barton,

    Would you please add a new class for the AMD Mobile Athlon A-4 1500 processor? Here's a link to the CPU World page describing it. http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K7/AMD-Mobile%20Athlon%204%201500%2B%20-%20AHM1500ALQ3B.html I'll post times for it when the new class is added. Thanks.

  5. Started by cnzdrn,

    Hi, a member of my team have an ati 4850 gddr4, it is correct to send the results in the category "radeon HD 4850" ? these are the results: http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/959923_avuduch_3dmark_2001_radeon_hd_4850_73372_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/963118_avuduch_3dmark_2003_radeon_hd_4850_57682_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/964243_avuduch_3dmark_2005_radeon_hd_4850_32241_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/960811_avuduch_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_4850_17016_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/964381_avuduch_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_4850_11088_marks Sorry for my b…

  6. Started by gradus,

    Have message from Massman "Dear Dark Welder, Dear Z.O.T team moderators, Hereby I'd like to inform you all of the fact that HWBOT result moderators have caught a member of your team using one single piece of hardware to submit in different hardware categories by changing the driver string. We offer Dark Welder the opportunity to clear up his profile in the next three days. If the cheated results are still present after three days, his account will be suspended. I hope you understand that we take this matter seriously. Best regards, Massman." About what results he talking...Dark Welder have foto of hardware to all new 3d results....give me links …

    • 3 replies
    • 963 views
  7. Started by YellowCaps,

    please fix: result a http://hwbot.org/community/submission/880389_yellowcaps_3dmark_2003_2x_radeon_hd_3870_x2_92425_marks?tab=info result b: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/879979_yellowcaps_3dmark_2006_2x_radeon_hd_3870_x2_26435_marks result c: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/880753_yellowcaps_aquamark_2x_radeon_hd_3870_x2_326580_marks is not 4x gpu - is 3x gpu ... Thx

    • 12 replies
    • 1.6k views
  8. Started by Hardbasevol1,

    Sry Please Delete.

  9. Started by guerreiro215,

    Congratulations. I wonder if there's something wrong with my post on Aquamark. For the same received no score, because my result was the 77th place, thereby obtaining some punctuation Here the screens: result Aquamark: http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/6531/aquaemerson.jpg result without punctuation: http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/2843/resultadonocomputado.png I so they could observe what may be happening, so that the score does not appear. Sorry my bad english ... Hugs and thanks.

  10. Started by ZaLiTH,

    Please could one of the admins reset my 'best score' for 3DMark06? I accidentally hit the wrong number when I was entering my submission, went back and edited it, but now it doesn't give me a rank at all, simply says "not ZaLiTH’s best 3Dmark 2006 submission, only best is ranked". I know I have a pretty low score in comparison to most computers here, but I'm curious to see how it ranks with my GPUs.... Link: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/962346_zalith_3dmark_2006_2x_geforce_8800_gts_320_mb_10629_marks

    • 3 replies
    • 875 views
  11. Started by RoccoESA,

    again and again here blocked because of to high score - according to which criteria one decides? the Main board is broken and has destroys the CCU - as I am to resist? The new mobo can not this mhz ... all indicated are ignored - do I have to be sponsor here, in order for full to be taken? is that competition or war here?

    • 11 replies
    • 1.3k views
  12. Started by [GF]Duke,

    Are you serious? This is a legit score. I have the ORB link and the SS what else do i need? I will run it again tonight and post it back here. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/962290_gfduke_3dmark_2003_radeon_hd_4850_68164_marks

  13. Started by uncle fester,

    Hi i was just looking at the wprime 32 hall of fame for 4x core cpu and noticed this submission which does not make sense http://hwbot.org/community/submission/855518_andreyang_wprime_32m_xeon_w3540_4sec_360ms No one else in the top 20 achieved anywhere near this at such low mhz and there is no cpu-z or screen shots to validate it other than the checksum validation. My honest opinion is he accidently put the wrong mhz when submitting his score and it was probably more like 5.4 ghz and not 4.8 i was just curious being its andre i would never think in any way he was cheating. http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/rankings?cores=4 Also does wprime requi…

  14. Started by e-Killer,

    I reported today alot Submision from some Users from Chile (Unknow Team). They upload incorrect benchmarks scores, and incorrect scores on benchmarks (Wprime 32M in Superpi 32M). I think they dont like that, and they do a hard research on my submits for find something wrong and cast doubt on my reputation. They Found something on my submision http://hwbot.org/community/submission/899838_e_killer_3dmark_2006_2x_geforce_gtx_275_30744_marks&popup=true they wrote is incorrect because i have made a mistake opening CPU-Z windows (i forgot to change 1 for show the memory) but that is not wrong, and is not need for correct SS (Rules only require CPU-Z Showing the CPU Frequenc…

  15. Hello, I was wondering about 3Dmark01 and which tests are to be used? The rules don't quite clearly state if all of them are to be used or the first group ending with Nature. Here is a fellow whom did all the tests and beat everyone by a large margin, concidering all the tests are calculated into this score. Of course the rules are a bit unclear on this matter, mind explaing to me. If it's only to be the first four tests what are we to do with this result? http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/948599_buttons_3dmark_2001_radeon_x600_se_15147_marks

    • 2 replies
    • 854 views
  16. http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/k6_3_400mhz CPU_Z 689.53Mhz by DDC This CPU used is a k6-III+ 400Mhz it is identified as such with a "D" model and EXT. model extention that are in all "k6-II+" and "k6-III+" within cpu cpuid identifier. Also labeled across the top line of information NAME line this CPU is labeled as such "AMD K6-III+" This in itself is a updated newer 0.18-micron model version within the k6 III family which has MMX, Extended 3DNow, PowerNow capablities beyound of the k6 III regular model in the 5/6/9/9 cupid identifiers. The cupid identifiers for a k6-III+ CPU will show as 5/6/D/D. This RARE processor along with k6-IIIE+ should be in a s…

  17. Hello, I personally also made the same mistake in this socket 775 class. I was looking at other submissions and noticed s478 cpus' listed, so I entered my submissions. I recently noticed pentium 512 are a socket 775 cpu and I deleated all of my submissions in the class. I also went though every single submision and flaged cpu-z picture provided submisions that showed an s487 cpu in the provided picture. I also cross referenced the motherboard used in a few cases that cpu-z provided picture was not shown but a listing of motherboard used was, I then flaged the users useing a s478 motherboard in the 775 motherboard class. In otherwords I flaged about 10 submisions in t…

  18. added the url to ORB so you can see it. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/913347_olbud_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_3200_rs780m_core_1625_marks?tab=info

    • 4 replies
    • 957 views
  19. Started by Wisetree,

    Hello Well a few days ago that I am part of this community, I got some results (3DMark), but in the wrong category "Core RS780M, RS780 I have still not mobile. The point is clear the results (second in 3D Mark 03/05/06), but I see many irregularities in this ranking, the top positions are with RS780 and not with the corresponding, which is RS780M Core. I hope you clean the case, this is healthy competition. A greeting Wisetree Team OCCL.

    • 5 replies
    • 1.2k views
  20. Started by Oj0,

    http://hwbot.org/community/submission/957661_oj0_3dmark_2003_radeon_hd_4670_39063_marks?tab=more Help With the card at 750/1000 I get 26k or so which is correct, at 800/1050 my score goes up by 50%?? I've tried MS drivers, Cat 9.1 and Cat 9.10, running twice in a row, driver sweeper, ... WHY's my score ALWAYS bugged?

    • 2 replies
    • 846 views
  21. Started by Sanders,

    Hey people, Lately I've been unable to bench a lot, so as a result my points keep on dropping. No biggy, part of the game. But unfortunatly I can not find where exactly these points are going to. Whereas in the previous version there was a nice page with -0,1 -1 point etc. is there such a thing in the new lay-out? Maybe I just can't find it... Thanks in advance edit: the first two rules of my post don't seem to be displayed...?

    • 7 replies
    • 1.1k views
  22. Started by RemiKo,

    I upload a full resolution screen, but hwbot preview resize to unreadible. Please check my score again: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/956732_remiko_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x3_720_be_15813_marks

    • 11 replies
    • 1.3k views
  23. Started by Donbe,

    I'm sorry,It made a mistake in registration. Please delete it. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/957543_donbe_pcmark_vantage_core_i7_extreme_965_14634_marks

    • 0 replies
    • 727 views
  24. Started by rbuass,

    Check the result #8. 3Dmark 2005 - 42511 marks - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Ati Radeon HD 5870 @1100/1250MHz) http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/953935_rbuass_3dmark_2005_radeon_hd_5870_42511_marks I have no points about this result; please fix the problem and give me the points. p.s. before it was correct, but i put a new score using Gulftown and lose the score (now i just deleted the Gulftown score, but i have a 44777 valid score to add to my results). Thanks ans sorry the "extra work"

    • 2 replies
    • 781 views
  25. Started by Bartmasta,

    im starting to get my results flagged heres the bug I've got 2 5770's in crossfire. I submitted the score as 2x 5770. But when I select the number of cores on my 720 BE it gets bugged. If I select unlocked to 3 cores, the score will display as 3 GPUS, and if I select (CPU) unlocked to 4 cores, the score will display as 4 GPUS even though I have 2 GPUS picked. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/948569_bartmasta_3dmark_2006_2x_radeon_hd_5770_20063_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/952088_bartmasta_3dmark_vantage___performance_2x_radeon_hd_5770_16451_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/954034_bartmasta_3dmark_2005_2x_radeo…