Submission & member moderation

hello i have athlon 1500+ socket A with 100X13.5=1350mhz but if i overclock it cpu-z detects it as 1600+ after that 1700+ and 1800+ and so on cpu ID changes with speed what can i do? this cpu is really 1500+ how should i prove that i dont have 1600 1700 1800 and so on i have only 1500+

Hi there, From Friday to Monday, several members of JMax-Hardware Team meet to bench together. We were 25 people, and we had 400L of LN2, some DI, 4 cascades and 3 SS. Of course, we had a lot of hardware, and this is the point of this thread : a lot of pour results have been invalidated because of hardware sharing. I don't have all the pics right now, but i wanna show which kinf of hardware were here. A little movie of all our setups (it was on friday night so some people are missing) : Here is our french thread for this bench party : http://www.jmax-hardware.com/forum/index.php/topic,3821.0.html A…

http://hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?name=application_9_rules here are the rules here is the result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=840868&popup=true where is the problem i mustnt show u my subscore rules say: * use default PCMark settings * have a valid screenshot (see example below): clearly show PCmark score, PCmark settings, processor in CPU-Z, unless you have a valid futuremark ORB url * have a valid futuremark orb link as verification for scores in the top 20 and your example: http://www.hwbot.org/blog/wp-content/pcmark05.jpg

hey guys I guess my 3dmark03 score got flagged for not enough proof. I updated it http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=820142 If you'd like I can upload the 3dmark save file as well. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=840116 Should have all the verification necessary lmk if I need to add anything. Not getting any points for it and the first time I submitted it, it disappeared lol It was late so It could have been me

something odd and I think it only came to be a while ago, unless I missed it the pifast submit form is in h/m/s/ms format, why ? it will only convert it back to all s/ms, the way pifast outputs it TIA, D

What did I wrong in these 2 submissions? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833773 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833771 Why should I provide valid ORB link? If u cant see CLEAR 3DMark score it's ONLY your problem!

Hey there, Now I've added a futuremark link, but I see no reason why this would be flagged as "insufficient verification". I'd like to have this rectified and I have to ask.....why would this, with a totally legit screenshot and all settings included, be flagged in the first place? url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=836994 Thanks, Rev

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1686 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_853 In both these cases, all the wprime scores are matched to the wrong CPU. X2 4000+ Toledo doesn't even exist... (same for X2 5400+ Manchester, btw) Sorry for not reporting these one by one, but it's too much work

One of my scores has been blocked by Demiurg because of insufficient verification for rankings,but.... In my opinion the reason for blocking my score is much different but I'll keep it for my self,whatever Please look at the 3dm2001 7200GS ranking for a second: http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7200+GS+256+mb+(145)&numberOfVideocards=1&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1213&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&…

There are Athlon XP-M scores in the Athlon XP 2500+ Barton section. I don't like to make noise, but there are rules here for a reason. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_231

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835832&popup=true Is the result, I have a valid ORB link so I dont even need to have a screenshot right? Didnt know how to delete the pic so I up'd one of a pretty winter scene

Hi, there are many sockel 939 results in the sockel 754 category of this cpu in Superpi. I have reported some results 2 times but nothing changed, for now i cant report this results because of moderated by hwbot crew. http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=251&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 most of the results have'nt any verification. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506883 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719498 2nd place, verification = link to forum post = sockel 939 Winchester http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525888 no verification http://www.hwbot.…

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696265 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674993

my english is not the best but i hope you understand what i say This score must be take by using PhysX http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=834600 a Q6600 can not have so much CPU score without PhysX Have a nice Day ~Morph~

It has been reported but remains in the wrong place, look this... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500621

Why i did loose my points in these result? SuperPi 32m - 8min 37sec 630ms - rbuass (no team) [ inspect ] Processor: Core i7 920 @ 4531mhz on h2o [ view screenshot ] Videocard: unknown Memory: 6144MB DDR3 PC3 12800 @ 1726mhz CL7.0 7-7-18 Motherboard: Biostar Tpower X58 Global Rank: not in top 1000, not ranked yet, or not the best result with this hardware of this user. Hardware Rank: 51st Core i7 920 - 0.0 points Description: no description Verfication: screenshot Scan date: 18-03-2009 05:27 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=833233 I reach a good result with the Core i7 940 but i loose my points with the Core i7 920 I think t…

well i have submitted 2 results and it said i got 15.1 and 11.4 on each of them. i go into my profile it shows i earned the points in the " last 7 days" page, but my points have not been added to my total score for a little over 24 hours. something new i should know? thanks. JB420

Hi, all of my 9500gt ddr2 scores have been reported by another user because i've submitted the scores using a 1gb card. http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1379&name=GeForce+9500+GT+%28DDR2%29+%28132%29 but there is no seperate category for 512mb/1gb for 9500gt. so could some mod please either create a seperate category or unflag my reported results. thanks

what whil this mean; 2 of your submissions require your attention. 2 submissions have been flagged by our moderators and require attention. You will not receive a rank nor points for them until the issue has been solved. 2 items found, displaying all items. VIEW - EDIT 7min 16sec 640ms reported by user wPrime 1024m rules http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=834272&popup=true 2009-03-21 09:50:43.0 - skulstation: manual online submission 2009-03-22 04:05:49.0 - r1ch: reported by user (wprime 2.0) VIEW - EDIT 15sec 150ms reported by user wPrime 32m rules http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=834273&popup=true 2009-03-21 09:…

Hello, in the moderator tools, reported the submissions that have been stowed should not be more. example: 3dmark 2001: 8 reported submissions (which have no more) sorry for the horrible English, "Google Translate" I hope you understand

Hi all guys,i opened this 3d to ask for sum help...2 of my fellows have been unbanned,and now their score is not listed in the team's score,could i know how come?I'd like to know as soon as possible if i dnt disturb thx

Under my profile it says that i have submitted 4 3dmark01 and 2 3dmark03 scores. But actually i have uploaded only one. Any way to remove those invisible results? Profile: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10015&public=true

Is it possible to delete submissions? I have 3 that were uploaded and they are all wrong by a large margin (a factor of 10). The example showed the score with 3D marks and I submitted that way and it added the 3 from that to my scores (a very stupid mistake on my part) and would like to delete all 3 and submit a correct one (hopefully mistake free). Ok I found it now sorry for the post.

I was under the impression that the big reg X and the Bold RED "NOT VALIDATED" was enough of a clue for a user to not submit it as a valid CPU-z verification...... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=832845