Submission & member moderation

Hey guys, I was just looking at some hardwares and I found this: http://img9.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sanstitrenlc.jpg There is a mistake somewhere... And also I was wondering something. I have a lot of computers under Linux, and I want to know if a screenshot of "cat /proc/cpuinfo" would be valid as a CPU-Z submitted score. I am not capable of installing windows emulators on these Linux machines because of super user issues. Thank you for the info. anvil

Please...i can t add my result in PiFast I effort myself to do it, but its impossible. This is a screen: When i did try to add, with all data complete, appear this message Please help me to put this score... Thanks and sorry the "extra work" and the broken english

I'm trying to submit a new SuperPi result and I get the foolowing error, any ideas: Crap. An error happened. We could blame this on you but it's most likely our crappy coding skills. You could try again or nudge our developpers for fixing this. Error message org.apache.torque.TorqueException: com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlDataTruncation: Data truncation: Data too long for column 'name' at row 1 Error stack trace org.apache.torque.util.BasePeer.throwTorqueException line 105 org.apache.torque.util.BasePeer.insertOrUpdateRecord line 680 org.apache.torque.util.BasePeer.doInsert line 562 org.hwbot.persistence.base.BaseImagePeer.doInsert line 238 org.hwbot.persistence.…

I noticed 2 results that the screen is completely incomplete. GeForce 6600 GT Duo / 3DMark 05 Processor: Athlon 64 3700+ San... @ 3030mhz Videocard: GeForce 6600 GT Duo @ 545/619mhz Global Rank: not in top 1000, not ranked yet, or not the best result with this hardware of this user. Hardware Rank: 2nd GeForce 6600 GT Duo - 1.8 points Description: Verfication: screenshot Scan date: 11-12-2006 06:49 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=564170 Processor: Athlon 64 3200+ Ven... @ 2200mhz Videocard: GeForce 6600 GT Duo @ 550/610mhz Global Rank: not in top 1000, not ranked yet, or not the best result with this hardware…

I wanted to ask as they never do not come assigned the points to me for this score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=822592 where it is the problem? I know that it would be to the maximum 1 point… but I do not understand because does not come assigned to me thanks Lele

I had my global PCM05 score reported for a "lack of validation." Theres nothing wrong with my score. Theres CPU-Z and GPU-Z windows present as well as a full score breakdown. The guy who reported it thinks there might have been a software RAMdisk used. My score breakdown will show that thats not possible. I used a single I-RAM. The edit button in the reported score box doesnt work. ... though im not sure what to edit- everything is fine What happens now? K

I made a result with my old laptop, using a Radeon X700 Mobility, but I ran the bench at 1280x800, and lately it was blocked by klopcha, and everything's fine with that. But why are those other results in the same category still online? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=793388 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=793788 And then there is this result, according to the screenshot is was made with a Radeon X1050, but it was already moderated so I couldn't report it. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=788925 Can a mod please look into this? ( First two results were reported by me using the proper tools btw. )

It has been reported but remains in the wrong place SS = 939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622460 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731309

Fixed Thanks

I am a new member and i did post some results here... I did post a GTX 285 SLI result in 3DM06..and it appear in 12º place, but i don t gain any points... when i tryed to register in futuremark (orb), i can t, cause i received an information that the serial is not available .... I hope you understand me..will i gain some point? Sorry the broken english Hugs

I've reported his results but nothing came off it. this is not just dodge its damn blatent. 2x9800gx2's in VISTA wont score 122k 01 with a q6600. Wtf. looked at this lol edited screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=830430 its his only score on hwbot. this is the user page. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=21088

Hey, I recently started benching here (completely as a hobby and only with air cooling etc.) and for my 3DMark03 scores, I've been getting very high scores (I'm talking first place out of all single 8800GT scores), even higher than those who are using Ln2 etc. for much higher clocks. I genuinely don't know what is causing these high scores. Here is the original submission: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=827248 Currently first in 8800GT submissions, but I've been flagged as being a possible cheater: 2009-03-01 03:17:23.0 - boogerthe2nd: manual online submission 2009-03-03 06:51:38.0 - Alexey17: reported by user due to lack of validation (Extraordinary fps …

This cpu was later found out to be an AM3 chip and fit in an AM3 board thus it needs to be moved to Phenom II x4 945 category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809941 Link to post stating it was AM3...... http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3605775&postcount=845

Hi. So i'm benching my 5000+ Brisbane, and got thus far on same settings: 5th place Pifast - 36.30 sec (1st 35.11 sec) 10th place on SuperPI 1M - 25.95 sec (24.41 sec) 45th place on Wprime 32M - 47sec 720ms (1st place - 22sec 250ms) Anyone find that a little odd? First 2 results makes sense, but the Wprime is so ridiculesly out of charts I have no idea what to think. Either I'm the dumbest OC'er in here, or there has been some hefty moderations to that 1st place wprime system. It has CPU clocked 123 MHz lower than mine, and still get a score 25,47 seconds lower than mine. Thats more than twice as fast.. At first I was running Vista 64-bit, but then i …

hello, i have a 4870x2 and a 4870 1gb, i did crossfire X, how can i upload my result ? i can ? thanks

Hi Guys, Have a query on 2 submissions with a 920i I placed on the bot in the last 2 days, both were awarded points and now both have disappeared! Would you please shed some light, As both had a link to orb I thought that was ok, do you now need screen shot and orb link or is orb link still fine. Here are the 2 in question http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=826189 orb link http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=832725 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=825634 orb link http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=1874358 Best Regards

Check this score please - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=824951 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=1871822

7300LE 64mb 3dm2006 796marks Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Gh... @ 3830mhz GeForce 7300 LE 64 ... @ 600/700mhz Scan date: 31-01-2009 05:11 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=816918 drivers 181.22 and few days after same user scored 1089 marks with almost exactly same setting(only graphic memory 70mhz higher and cpu speed 70Mhz less),same drivers: Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Gh... @ 3780mhz GeForce 7300 LE 64 ... @ 600/765mhz SM2.0 429marks HDR/SM3.0 320marks Scan date: 07-02-2009 10:50 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=819563 drivers 181.22 I leave it under moderation, in my opinion mipmap was used ,but im not t…

Title says it all: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=823027

X800 Gto2 All don't see resolution in 3DMark screen's, same nick, but this is wrong already reported, but so far has not been checked http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796918 - No Resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796915 - No Resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796914 - No Resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796912 - No Resolution And Something Old ..... X1050 in Radeon 9550 Including no resolution in some bench I made the report in May 2008, on time, with the bell, but has not been changed, for One Mod that it's wrong, not wrong for other, please check again. http://www.hwbot.org/resu…

Am I right in saying that 3rd-party Aegia cards are still allowed in HWB and FM leaderboards? Is there a reliable way of telling if someone has used one or the other? K This might be a mute point as a few forum threads are saying Aegia solution= painful but hey...it cant hurt to know Having said that...theres PCI-E x1 versions around as well as PCI...would the interface make much difference? PCI even kills an FX5200 compared to AGP so...y'know...

Why two different users from the same team Steam E @ Shahryar NEO uploaded exactly same SS/score to the 3dmark vantage category?? Scan date: 04-12-2008 01:09 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=797812 Scan date: 27-12-2008 05:10 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=805267 I have checked their profiles and there is more interesting scores,exactly same speed of gpu/mem,drivers etc http://www.hwbot.org/searchMembers.do?userId=18621&name=Stream.E http://www.hwbot.org/searchMembers.do?userId=10854&name=Shahryar_NEO I don't think that's allowed ...no comment

I have all the required screenshots and I have a futuremark link. Why is this score blocked?

This category is full of high results done with X700 and 8/6/8 instead of 4/6/8 that has X700 EZ. Two weeks ahead I'm reporting on this results and situation is the same. Why do you ignore so long this reports?

now eram score can be validate on orb but they are still banned on hwbot so i think it's more correct that in our screenshot we show also controll pannel screen