Jump to content

Submission & member moderation

Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...

  1. @ Polonos: You are into Outofspecs.gr forums right?.... WHY don't you delete EITHER Unseen's CPU related scores OR Doom's CPU related scores which have been done WITH THE EXACT SAME ES CPU?.... WHY MUST I always be the "bad guy" in your eyes and NOT YOU fix it BEFORE anything?..... NO, I'm NOT sending any PMs or e-mails...... I will ALWAYS talk in PUBLIC.... PERIOD.....

    • 15 replies
    • 2.9k views
  2. Started by demos_sav,

    Look at this cpu It is supposed to be a 24x100=2400mhz cpu. Most of them post scores with a p4 with an 18x multiplier. The most interesting part is this. look at #3 on cpu-z. Look at the screenshot and verifications he posted. A q6600 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=249372

    • 3 replies
    • 1.6k views
  3. Started by hipro5,

    Here's an e-mail two of my team members have got from hwbot Moderator/s..... Hi guys! We moderators at the HWbot are suspecting that you three guys have used same hardware in some bench session. You have submitted almost similar results to each account. That is not allowed in HWbot. Only the OWNER of the parts can submit result. I know that you have a lot of sponsored hardware, but that doesn't change this situation. You have two (2) days time to fix your results. After that time limit I will block two of those results and only the best result can stay. But that best result must be from the same user in every benchmark. You decide who it will be. T…

  4. Started by neco,

    Hi im new in hwbot I were looking the rankings and found this in top 1 If thats normal could someone explain me why ? PS: sorry for my bad english

  5. Started by knopflerbruce,

    I had a score blocked because a mod wanted a proper validation, and not a picture of my frozen desktop. Where does it say that a photo isn't good enough? If that rule doesn't exist, please unblock my score. Score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671222 The CPUZ benchmark is (for us HWBot users at least) only a nice way of proving insanely high clocks. Which I did by using a camera. The score is there, it's no doubt about the fact that my Opty 185 ran at 3817mhz for a second or 2. Sure, it froze, but... like I said, it's no stability benchmark:) I've seen alot of people on forums (like xs) use photos to prove scores, why shouldn't we be allowed the …

    • 8 replies
    • 1.9k views
  6. Ηι, suddenly I lost a gold cup,so I saw that one of my resaults was removed after a very long time that was uploaded.Please check it out: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618540 EDIT:My mistake.We used to run different type of pifast then.Sorry.

    • 0 replies
    • 906 views
  7. Started by mtzki,

    hwbot is starting manual cleaning of the entries. Biggest problems are bad or missing verification links, missing CF/SLI checks and incorrect hw matching. This result moderation will be done in a hierarchial fashion with halls of fame having highest priority and other results getting cleaning less regularly. We always check a result if someone asks for it with the 'report suspicious entry' link. We try to fix the faulty entries if possible. Blocking is the last resort. As it happens, the better a result is, the bigger chance it has to get inspected and modified. Please understand that if an entry gets blocked it very very rarely if ever means it was considered a fake …

  8. Started by Sn@ke Oc,

    what´s wrong with it? hello....i´ve only a short question...... why are these 3 results of benches have been blocked? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677405 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677811 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677400 Maybe you can explain it to me....thx

    • 3 replies
    • 1.3k views
  9. Started by Cooper510,

    Hi. I´m missing my result for the wprime 32m. I´ve made a mistake and i added the score in the category for superpi 32m. And so i got an e-mail about this problem. But i´m not able to add a result for the right category "wprime 32m". And when i follow the link "click here" the following screen appears: Is someone here who´s able to explain me what´s wrong?

    • 2 replies
    • 1.2k views
  10. Bonjour, Hi, Some of my results came up with the above warning. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669536 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669480 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669481 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669482 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669610 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669486 All of these are done with a notebook Dell Latitude X1 with an intel pentium M 1.1Ghz inside. Somebody can tell me what I have to do to retrieve my benchmark in the bot? Thanks in advance

  11. Started by z0Ink,

    I have submitted successful my 3D Merk 05 Run, but when i saw the uploaded Screen, i got really scared. There ist a piece of the Messenger which covers a part of the ATI Tool Screen. I Think this is why i have a N/A in front of the Submitted Run. This is the Picture: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676068 Does this one Count? ________ Aromed Vaporizer

    • 6 replies
    • 1.5k views
  12. Started by der8auer,

    Hello I just uploaded my PC Mark05 score using my 2 AMD FX-74. But the HWbot showed me an AMD MP 1000 as i uploaded it Help please

  13. Started by ncc-1709,

    is this ok to use, due to some of the info being missing. i though i would ask before putting it on. http://valid.x86-secret.com:80/show_oc.php?id=280563

  14. Started by Palicavonzvreca,

    Hi, when I submitted a result with my P3 result I went wrong with the pic (picked the one from my Athlon instead): The result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674620 The pic that should be is this one: Easiest way for me would be to submit it again, but I want you to know before that, so, shall I submit it again and you delete the wrong one or you will fix it? Regards.

  15. Started by Palicavonzvreca,

    Hi there. I've noticed a wrong result with my 6750 super pi 1M, it appears as 12.78s, when it is 12.078s in fact. Tried to submit the right result again, but I'm not allowed to. I won't be given any point anyway, but I would like to see it right. Link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669132 Thank you in advance guys. Regards.

  16. Started by Maxi,

    Hi guys, Just a friendly reminder, all 3DMark HOF scores require a published link. Scores in the HOF missing the compare URL will be blocked, unless previously verified by a moderator. If you we're not able to publish a result at the time you submitted to hwbot (FM blackout), please try to publish the link again so your scores may be verified. Thanks, maxi

    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  17. Its a evga geforce 6800 but back then i played with drivers so i named it a gt in the driver to see if i would get any increase in scores. Its been blocked for a while with the right orb link and a screen shot. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610702 Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce 6800 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3650700

  18. Started by demos_sav,

    I beleive that some or all of this user's bots are faulty.But i am not sure though:o The user's name is Tamerlan

    • 6 replies
    • 1.8k views
  19. Started by |ron,

    Hi everybody, I have a question for you moderators! Some time ago you invalidated me a results of mine made with a Geffo 7800GTX because I made a screen full of details but with the resolution missing... I didn't upped the result of the ORB that time because I was planning to bench more seriously than air soon... The incriminated screen was that: Ok, that was my fault, if you need the resolution to be visible, then It's correct to remove that screen... So, today I was watching at the situation in the X850XT WRs, 3 of them are mine but today a new result was upped and I lost one of them... I'm talking about that result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=6652…

    • 6 replies
    • 1.8k views
  20. Started by maxine,

    Collection of wrong results....mainly Nvidia 6800 PCX in AGP categ. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is an Opteron 144 (socket 939) in a Lanparty NF4-D running an 6800AGP card (see ORB link) THIS MOBO NOT HAVE AGP SLOT.....so, please move to the correct category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661112 This is an PCI-X 6800 in an AGP categ....NV41 (see rivatuner) is PCX if i´m not mistake... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653104 Another PCX in AGP categ...see his sign (Abit ip35-pro + 6800GS)....THIS MOBO HAVENT AGP. So it´s clear it´s an PCX in the AGP categ. Please, move to the correct categ. htt…

    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  21. Started by nflesher87,

    Hey guys, I was just curious whether I could get a bit more clarification on why some of my benchmarks submissions aren't getting scored. Most notably, all the 3DMark submissions I made today for my X1900XTX. I may be jumping the gun but usually at least one or two of them would be scored by now but none have been. Is GPU-Z now required in screenshots or is there something else I'm missing in my screenshots? Any help would be greatly appreciated and thanks for you time!

    • 1 reply
    • 989 views
  22. Started by K404,

    Should they be allowed? The scores are "valid," but the competition isnt.

  23. Hi. One of my results came up with the above warning. I republished the ORB entry and edited the score with the new URL. Will it be picked up automatically in due time and considered a full HWB entry? Also- for general knowledge- for anyone using the basic versions of 3DM/PCM, if we change hardware and submit a new result, will we lose the points for the old ones because we can only have 1 verified result at a time? Cheers!

  24. Started by pusher,

    I think that the title is clear enough. I could say many thinks about verification methods but I'll use an example that will make the procedure easier for all of us. Screenshot: Is it fake or not and why?

    • 9 replies
    • 2.5k views
  25. Started by Astri,

    Please fix the vga from 8800GTS 640 to 320 for the result below http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644625