marco.is.not.80

yep! :-)

I think in the interest of - i don't know- can't think of anything - but you should avoid sweeping the competition with 50s across the board by temporarily becoming mortal on the final two GPU benchmarks for div 1 ;-) PS: insane time!

I am trying to enter my score for SuperPI in my latest result and it won't take "05:27:016" and keeps changing it when I hit submit to "05:27:160" which is obviously not the same thing. See the following link: http://hwbot.org/submission/3807117_marco.is.not.80_superpi___32m_core_i7_7700k_5min_27sec_16ms/ What the heck?

Nice one, boss!

I don' t know enough about LN2 to tell you if that means it scales but I can tell you just so you can get some context that using a water chiller my 8800k is doing 5.6 at 1.58.

Mat, this is old news but I never did officially thank you for removing the HPET timer requirement in GPUPI for Skylake and above processors. Thanks for all your hard work!

veryimpressive, jpm...

30 seconds is huge!

Shit... how do I correct that? I guess I can't... Man, I was so tired and forget to change the tabs. Of course, right?

Amazing score - is running this benchmark on XP or even Windows 7 that much better performance? I mean, I'm killing myself on this benchmark and have only shaved off a few seconds - no way I could do 5:15 so it's obviously possible. Anyways, nice job - really good time!

:-(

Mind altering performance (and of course entertainment!) :-)

actually maybe it's just bad IMC luck...

you need to show me how to get my ram timings so low - I've just don't get how I could purchase so many sets of b-die and have never got one time where I could just do some thing like 12-12-12-28 at 4000 ... I think I've just over studied it and have missed some obvious thing... We should get on Skype or some shit like that one night.

Crazy!

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/d9/d9c8c24e5dfe8a5791c0196b5d9b8d2dd5ca4701df1edbf34aa2bb4f0cf45b96.jpg

I'm fairly certain that the issue is caused by the hwinfo64.dll since I stuck a debugger on it and it seemed to suggest that was where it was getting hung up but of course I don't have the source code or all the symbols but I'm curious to why some people who had the same problem end up getting a working version by copying the program directory from another machine... ? Or maybe I read them wrong...

this sucks guys - I'm getting the exact same problem with steam version and website version (purchased versions) on both of my benchmark machines that run Windows 10. One is a brand new installation so obviously there is something wrong. There are also a few forum posts on their website that go unanswered dealing with the same issue. It makes no sense that it's a driver issue when everything else works but Catzilla has an issue confirmed by many others...

Wait, so $300 for both sets? Will you ship to USA? The first screenshot says 4GB DIMMs but are the second pair 4GB or 8GB? I assume 4GB but just in case. - Marco PS: Also willing to trade for me becoming your PR manager. ;-)

Very nice!

Yes, grats to winners - and good luck to all on random draws!

I was definitely using the latest version of XTU. Latest BIOS for board, too. Glad to know I wasn't the only one, though :-)

If I set my BIOS to 50 x 100 and XTU reports "5.01" ghz can someone kindly advise me on how to avoid that in the future? Shouldn't that be counted as a simple flux considering CPU-Z shows 5000? This was the entry that was removed: http://hwbot.org/submission/3608318_marco.is.not.80_xtu_core_i5_7600k_1525_marks Not fighting it but would like to know if I really would need to lower my multiplier and than play with BCLK for next time?

I just realized you were talking about the processor speed. That's gotta be some sort of bug because when you set your BIOS to 50 x 100 isn't the "5.01" just a fluctuation? How in the earth would I avoid that?

Is that the version of XTU? Where can I find the information that states what versions are allowed? I thought I was running the latest version...