ground

I mean... while I get the point of a ban here but just take him out of the season ranking. Leave the offender unbanned, but disable points for him permanently.

I mean... its a database, you can search for user + score + main hardware component and if there is an exact match throw a warning to the user and if he ignores it flag the sub for the mods to check against. Please don’t make subbing to hwbot harder then it already is

@Leeghoofd so I now have to pay attention to the date shown in the OS? I’m just speaking for myself here, but I feel like its a bit of an overreaction. I have many boards I run without bios battery and this often results in the date in the OS being completely wrong. Some OS’s I even go as far as stripping the clock out. Isn’t it possibly to automatically compare subs posted by a person to previous subs posted with the same hardware by the same person? If they are identical show a warning message and if they sub anyways flag the sub for moderator checking.

Thanks! Initially wanted to wait until I actually tested CPUcool as well, but since this thread is already here might as well start. I have a slightly different Board (X7DBR-3) (5000P instead of 5000X chipset as well as different layout) 1. On my board I vid-modded the NB, ran it all the way up to 1.7V with it cold, but no noticable benefit 2. tried 3 different sets of fb-dimm, one of which was known to do 500 MHz in another board with a different divider, all got pretty much the same results 3. I’ve so far only had time to try Setfsb, how much further did CPUcool get you? With Setfsb I was getting a wall around ~436 fsb 4-6 nothing to report.. yet Same here, once I get back home I’ll try cpu cool and try to figure out some voltmods for all the relevant rails.

Crazy score, great work! Did you try Single sided memory if it makes a difference? How far could you get without CPUz open?

with disabled cores.

nice memory :D

Is this tapakahs old board?

Because the mods aren't people? Its 13 people who would like CC in the first half of the year and 15 who want to keep it in the last quarter.

more like a vote for moving it around 2 weeks would be nice.

sweet!

PM'ed

These 771 boards are quite fun, though I feel like either CPU-Cool works significantly better then setfsb on these boards or I was doing something else wrong. I would for sure like to further explore these supermicro boards next year, if you want we can make a discussion thread about these boards at some point. Even going cold with memory known to do 500 MHz in another board I couldn't get close with NB on LN2 (actually barely got anything more over ambient anyways), so great work!

@antome has a search thread maybe this fits

Anyone considered Threadripper for 32M? It doesn't seem to have as bad fabric coldbug issues as zen2.

Impressive!

Only thing it needed was less PLL (was running 1.4V PLL). Was quite surprised, since at default it coldbugs at -120ish. Or this board just works better on cold then my R2E did, not quite sure yet, but I'm certainly buying a R3F now (this one was a loaner from Gigelz). Also had a 14.99 score but didn't take a screenshot because I didn't notice my 14.96 was invalid One of many scores from the session with Bullshooter, Gunzi and Tantekaethe.

Agreed, just 2 weeks change could make it a whole lot more convenient. That or 2 weeks longer and a mid/late december background change to make sandbagging harder

jup, BCLK didn't scale at all beyond -110 or so Core is nowhere near the end of scaling but BCLK just won't do more.

400 with bsel and the rest with setfsb I guess?

PCI, AGP, IGP, Hybrid and PCIe. Germany is missing AGP, Italy PCI for example.

Who needs skulltrail?

what voltage was this run at?

I knew someone would take on this score eventually, great work! Will be harder now...

wow, 700+ FSB on an 98 board? apparently not all boards later then 8B are bad...