TerraRaptor
Members-
Posts
1960 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
47
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by TerraRaptor
-
Dry_Ice777 - Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 5814MHz - 7sec 984ms SuperPi - 1M
TerraRaptor replied to 12's topic in Result Discussions
Well done. Try adjusting skews first - cpu skew of 200-300ps and nb of 0-100ps when running high fsb. -
Not sure if it ever existed except some engineering samples. I had only ECS P6S5AT with sis635t and even with PLLmod the experience was not that successful - I think sis635t must be very picky with RAM (same as pro266 - I had only one ddr stick able to work @195mhz or so - and it was micron 5b not bh5) and won't go >200mhz RAM tight (and as the cpu bus is 64bit, the only advantage of ddr chipsets is to beat i815 with ram frequency). I would better then investigate i820/i840 and RDRAM - if these would go 250mhz fsb-wise then there may be a chance (but not for every cpu etс). But again, never seen interesting boards for sale (and intel boards lack proper clock generators).
-
That is the same pcb with some bells&whistles missing - agp instead agp-pro, no cnr, no integrated vga. Never tried it though. Should be identical to CUSL2 in terms of overclocking.
-
That could be a dram vrm bug of a partucular board to kill it - not a platform issue. I had s478 board recently with pll mod that was accidentally killing cpus although pll voltage was in line with no-mod boards.
-
PKBO - GeForce 7800 GT @ 621/725MHz - 88770 marks 3DMark2001 SE
TerraRaptor replied to miker2ka's topic in Result Discussions
Dead sure this is the same card as here - https://hwbot.org/submission/4083883_ Most likely, cheat involves nvstrap driver. Same bios, same score, same clocks -
I had several mobos on i815 with integrated video and they were no go for overclocking. However I was quite noobie that days so don't know what to expect with proper approach. Video is last thing one should consider with this socket anyway.
-
External clock may have less jitter/phase noise (i.e. high end audiophile gear sometimes use external clocks for their DAC of a femtosecond grade). That is my guess. At least, the different quality of pll ic may be the reason why TUSL/CUSL boards have certain difference in max clock between samples - the reason may be not chipset but pll. GraduS should know more - he was really deep into digging JP forums on s370.
-
Those were turboPLL/JordanPLL to allow overclocking on the boards with no-overclock stock pll ic. I believe you cannot run pci/ide in asynchronous mode if chipset doesn't support it which is the case for i815
-
Easiest way to check what limits you is to use different "straps" and low multi coppermine d0. First check fsb limit of cpu with 133/100 and write down clocks for pci (if waza locks system at given fsb - then it is ide limit). Then go 133/133 to find memory limit. Then check 66/100 to see if you can break the pci clocks of 133/100 while staying with dram below limit of 133/133. PS. IDE is definitely a problem. Japanese were using IBM fireballs if i'm not mistaken in early 00's which were known to stand 50-55 mhz ide clocks.
-
Why have temperature restrictions if we only have 4.5GHz limit? More to that, I guess monitoring software like HWINFO should (must) have a possibility to offset the values so it will be easy to trick it. Another trick is - run the test with eg. SS, run the test, open tabs, switch SS off and let the temperature rise. I think temperature limit should be removed and the frequency limit should be adjusted to meet "average air overclock" for the given DIV#X platforms. Let's say, if the stage assumes the use of Pentium III Coppermine, let the LCC frequency be 1200MHz or 3600MHz for Core 65nm.
-
A7N8X-E Deluxe as an alternative for socket 462
TerraRaptor replied to TerraRaptor's topic in Mainboards
Yes, boots fine with flash drives prepared in Winsetup2USB to install w2k/wxp/2k3 if boot device set to USB-HDD. -
A7N8X-E Deluxe as an alternative for socket 462
TerraRaptor replied to TerraRaptor's topic in Mainboards
@sammurai will post pictures as soon as I get to the board So far, I had at least 2.15v measured. Probably just my board. Anyway, ovp-mod should not be hard to implement -
ROG Dominus Extreme
TerraRaptor replied to flanker's topic in Skylake/Kaby Lake/Coffee Lake (-X) (Z170/Z270/Z370/X299) OC
I remember promo of Giga lga1366 ud9 (i guess) - with demonstration vrm is capable of delivering 1.5kW jvhW-5BzoE0 So not the first time the board has such a monster vrm- 3 replies
-
- dominus extreme
- rog
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I guess LOD tweak was available for me in 3DMark Vantage and 3D11 several years ago (HD7970 era). That was a combination of utility to change LOD + certain level of catalyst AI - buggy one but working sometimes. Do not know what is the situation now with modern hardware and Crimson drivers.
-
@DeDaL @gradus
-
Same question here. Need to go desktop version to search
-
Bullant - Core i7 870 @ 5069MHz - 7min 5sec 250ms SuperPi - 32M
TerraRaptor replied to M1RROR's topic in Result Discussions
Never thought these dram frequency/timings are possible. Great skills. -
Vnb 1.95, Vdimm 3.5 (stock one is fed from 5v, so no need for external vrm - besides it's said to be not compatible with ocz booster due to protection issues), Vcpu + capmod for cpu and nb (added 10x25uF ceramics + 2x470uF tantals for cpu and 2x470uF tantals + 1x3300uF electrolyte for nb). Bios 1013 1t from Trats. I have also done vcca mod - no difference from default 2.5v to 3.2v with single stage. Probably may be of help with ln2.
-
Thanks all. This is rather a cpu clock limit as the board is able to run 260mhz with same settings and unlocked barton with lower multi. I should also try other bh-5 sticks (mine are dual sided, 4 chips each side - guess not the perfect ones for this board) and try higher Vnb (1.95v now - although I had gains up to 2.4v with previous epowered board). My expectation is 270mhz fsb 32M stable is possible.
-
gotohell - Trio 3D/2X AGP - 105 marks 3DMark2001 SE
TerraRaptor replied to gotohell's topic in Result Discussions
that was fast -
I wouldn't do this. UAT uses a database taken from original hwbot and I don't think syncing this "outdated" (let it be 2-3 days older before hwbot went offline) to the main db is a good idea etc. They will have a lot of issues when rev8 goes to public so another syncing task should be avoided if possible. Anyway, why can't you wait a day or two?
-
UAT still works