websmile

6m32.140 - websmile - Core i5 2500K @ 5003 MHz -2x2GB@1135 MHz CL7-9-6-20 1T - Asus Maximus V Formula Meanwhile a bored guy in germany... - minor update

Even more funny that the two of you jump out of the box when I decided to sell my 2000c7 GTs yesterday

6m33.093 - websmile - Core i5 2500K @ 4998.00 MHz - 1134 MHz CL8-9-6-20 1T - Asus Maximus V Formula Another 2500K - precision on BCLK seems to be something Asus will never learn, for gens now same problems

Can be closed and moved, thanks for the space, hwbot

I´ll do that for you, I know no shame, is Impact though if you want to buy one - my backup kit on air - good kit, Bull, your 2300c8 are not bad at all on trcd and seem to have potential

Thank you

Last bump for the stuff, I have no use for it

Thx, 2500K is not ideal for low clock as you know (1s slower) and bclk is not strong, but I bought chip because of general potential (57 boot/validation). It is really fun to revisit SB after long time - I hope you enjoy it as well

Bump for the OCZ, they do 2600 psc profile on impact but are most likely bdbg or such stuff^^

6m33,297s - websmile - Core i5 2500K @ 5001.00 MHz - 1111 MHz CL7.0 9-6-20 1T - Asus Maximus V Formula Fast test of a cpu I received today, all air

Gene works as goodas Impact if you get good sample, about the capabilities of the Formula I have no further information

Morning

Z87 Asus boards except for Impact 6 are crap - and Asrock generally needs less voltage on psc than Asus boards even on Z97, I tested on impact7 against z87 and z97 ocfm and ocf and difference on some kits was up to 0,03v at my tests. It is no surprise your Mems fail 2667 on Gene6 for example

Deal, Frank, GA sold to Bullshooter

^^

Wow.. great job

Those clocks on the cards...

That´s pretty impressive...

Nice pretest

Last bump

How about stripping legacy 3ds except 03 from wr points an making small compensation to give to an old 2d benchmark like Spi or Pifast? I know these are already awarded great, but I see this as a symbol for community that you can get honour also without using the real big gun, it would be a sign of appreciation also for the non pros and a small compensation and sign, we can´t ignore that majority of the community uses these and it should be appreciated in a more direct way than now via the old 3ds which are out of vga limit now for some time. What is a bigger problem for me, even though I like benching old cards in cf or sli at legacy benches and know others like this as well, is the fact that you get globals for score with 4 cards that are nearly half of best single card scores (3d01 for example) - on this I see absolutely no sense, and if we discuss the future of these benchmarks, this is a bigger injustice for me than the wr points because logic fails on this. I am for sure not against changes that make sense, and I know that removing wr points from am3 for example would be OK for other reasons than stopping haswell dominate the ranking

What´s the problem with benches awarded more points that are benched more often and hardware awarded more points that is used more often? The hardware, the benchmarks or your algorithm? What will happen in five years when other 3ds are benched to the max like vantage or 11, and you see the same problem with other hardware? Will you remove simply wr points or will you start the solve the real problem? Taking away the only wr points possible for most used hardware at community is not solving the reasons of the problem but only making cheap work at the symptoms P.S. the wr points were my bad, I read lower facit were there was no zero inserted - and to your edit about algorithm, it is not the wr points why you get more points for the 4770 and for legacy 3ds, but it is your algorithm - so why remove wr points when they are not the problem and your algorithm is fine? Then justice wants 4770k to get more points, it is the system aka algorithm and not the wr points that cause this

arriba

Sure, didn´t you tell algorithm is ok? Then you might take in that there are nearly 10 times as much subs with 4770k than 5960x and legacy benches are old with tons of results^^- your example is far from legit or you simply change your algorithm^^ and btw, where do you get 2d wr points with 4 core cpu? at cb, wprime or hwbotprime against 8, 16 or 24 core cpu- the 2d wrs are very much concentrated on server systems? lmao - fail, Roman, and this is why I said that removing legacy 3d wrs is needing small compensation at 2d - other option to avoid the bad influence of cheap hardware to hwbot might be lower cap on global points, and I also see no reason to give globals to multi-cpu benches that are lower than single scores like on old 3d mark 01 for example

Generally there is no need to give wr points to all five legacy 3ds, this is overproportional. It might be worth thinking about stripping two of them who don´t scale with multi vga (AM3,01,05 and 06) of this, as well as one of the cinebenches or wprime 1024, and give instead wr points to other old stuff 32m Spi and maybe Pifast to keep the current relation of hardware needed to get wr points. My main goal is to keep this attractive also to people who use 200-300 euro cpus and not only 1k 5960x, on which best samples are pre-binned vendor stuff on top. We are always talking about a "community" - 1150 i7 is backbone of this community at the moment, if you compare number of subs made with 1155 3770k, 1150 4770K/4790K (aka as binnable cpus for all) to all 2011 platforms you will see what I mean, I even left out sandy bridge because of obvious reasons and get more than 110k subs made there which is for these aolne far more than on all three 2011 gens with all cpus, I even left out stuff like k-i5s