El Gappo Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 Just got: L041C238 #3242 Testing under SingleStage: this cpu really sucks monkeyballs - 53x100 = freeze during windows load, max boot 52x100 ... what a crappy piece ^^ beat this http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1749983 -40C royal monkey balls 3047A237 Costa Rica chips seem to of been sucking serious balls so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linuxfan Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 beat this http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1749983 -40C royal monkey balls 3047A237 Costa Rica chips seem to of been sucking serious balls so far. Costa Rica chips don't seem to be any different than other ones... just random as ever Some are good some are bad... If its limited to 50x then cold doesn't make a difference... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuchnit Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 2600k 3049A287 Costa Rica 1501 got here today. Will report back later when I fire it up in the UD7. So far only x54. Gotta try a couple other BIOS though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linuxfan Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 So far only x54. Gotta try a couple other BIOS though. Probably limit if you already have PLL overvoltage and are running up the volts with 2c2t already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuchnit Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 Probably limit if you already have PLL overvoltage and are running up the volts with 2c2t already. Very true but Cowie is still on F2 because he says he can't boot past x53 on any of the B3 betas. I need to actually test F2 and try two other betas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 5, 2011 Author Share Posted April 5, 2011 Updated first post! - 96 FPO/steppings - 296 entries Updated again: - 103 FPO/steppings - 303 different samples Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splmann Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 L040B166 #1247 @ Single Stage 5708 Mhz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dejan_bin_laden Posted April 5, 2011 Share Posted April 5, 2011 2500k 3048A446 2537 x55 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubbahotep Posted April 6, 2011 Share Posted April 6, 2011 (edited) 2600k @5100 vcore 1.45 3103B335 from frys Edited April 6, 2011 by bubbahotep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumo Posted April 6, 2011 Share Posted April 6, 2011 (edited) L038A660 *A1241 53X max...not bother to try max Mhz L045B021 *A1943 53X L050A853 *A2927 54X and Mhz wall @ 5506 3049A330 *A0174 52X max 3050A749 *A1961 52X max 3101A201 *A2247 53X max 3101A201 *A1531 53X max 3101A201 *A2242 54X and Mhz wall @ 5470 3101A201 *A1499 56X and Mhz wall @ 5650 All on ss cooling, seem like 3 batches need less vcore comparo to L0 batches Finally came face to face with the dreaded post code 00 (MIVE) on one of my really good chip:( Edited April 9, 2011 by dumo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolhand411 Posted April 6, 2011 Share Posted April 6, 2011 (edited) after reading about all this Malay,Costa Rica chips i think this is appropriate to post; http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=750461 I posted it this in the mammoth Northwood thread, and Wingz posted it in GH. I thought I'd post it once more just for the extra exposure. Just to clear something up, the markings on the back of the CPU refer to the packaging site - not the manufacturing site of the actual silicon chip itself. Intel has no fabs in either Malaysia or Costa Rica, they are packaging facilities. The silicon die/chips are manufactured elsewhere in the world and are shipped to either of these two packaging sites. In addition, Intel manufacturing has a goal of running a "virtual fab" - meaning that, among other things, products from one fab are statistically indistinguishable from those manufactured at another fab. So even if, for example using fake names, Malaysian packages used chips only from fab #1 and packages marked Costa Rica use chips from fab #2, there should be no difference statistically between these two. I saw these discussions back in the Celeron days, and I commented back then, but this time around it seems a little different. I have started seeing some online retailers charging more for parts from a specific packaging site and this disturbs me. There is no difference between parts from these two packaging sites. Just as you can have 6 head/tails coin tosses come out heads, there may seem to be a correlation that heads is more likely than tails, but there isn't. In reality the odds are still approximately 50/50. The silicon is what defines the speed of a CPU, not the package. And the silicon comes from multiple fabs scattered all over the place that are all supposed to be identical anyway. If you are considering spending more, or buying from a shadier vendor, in order to get a specific package, I would urge you to reconsider. There is no difference and you are only wasting money, and or risking getting ripped off. Patrick Mahoney Microprocessor Design Engineer Intel Corp. Edited April 6, 2011 by coolhand411 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linuxfan Posted April 6, 2011 Share Posted April 6, 2011 after reading about all this Malay,Costa Rica chips i think this is appropriate to post; http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=750461 I posted it this in the mammoth Northwood thread, and Wingz posted it in GH. I thought I'd post it once more just for the extra exposure. Just to clear something up, the markings on the back of the CPU refer to the packaging site - not the manufacturing site of the actual silicon chip itself. Intel has no fabs in either Malaysia or Costa Rica, they are packaging facilities. The silicon die/chips are manufactured elsewhere in the world and are shipped to either of these two packaging sites. In addition, Intel manufacturing has a goal of running a "virtual fab" - meaning that, among other things, products from one fab are statistically indistinguishable from those manufactured at another fab. So even if, for example using fake names, Malaysian packages used chips only from fab #1 and packages marked Costa Rica use chips from fab #2, there should be no difference statistically between these two. I saw these discussions back in the Celeron days, and I commented back then, but this time around it seems a little different. I have started seeing some online retailers charging more for parts from a specific packaging site and this disturbs me. There is no difference between parts from these two packaging sites. Just as you can have 6 head/tails coin tosses come out heads, there may seem to be a correlation that heads is more likely than tails, but there isn't. In reality the odds are still approximately 50/50. The silicon is what defines the speed of a CPU, not the package. And the silicon comes from multiple fabs scattered all over the place that are all supposed to be identical anyway. If you are considering spending more, or buying from a shadier vendor, in order to get a specific package, I would urge you to reconsider. There is no difference and you are only wasting money, and or risking getting ripped off. Patrick Mahoney Microprocessor Design Engineer Intel Corp. Thanks for the info Patrick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimoLeras Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 2600k L044b694 #0864: 5300mhz L044b676 #3082: 5200mhz 2500k 3044b310 #3012: 5550 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 (edited) i5-2500K: L046B582 2105 <5.100 MHz Can't boot Win @ 5.1 GHz (51 x 100)/1.5 V(+) at air with P8P67 (PLL OV enabled), so no further testing - max frequency is probably even <5 GHz. Edited April 7, 2011 by Hyperhorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest marcus_T Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 2600K L045A912 max 5600 3DM06 stable 5500 mhz / Vantage stable 5400 mhz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diabolo 80 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 New one! L052A707 #1350 5600mgz 103,7x54 1,62V, wprime 1024 stable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanBoTech Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 (edited) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1750024 L051B138 #0453 5001.9 Mhz Not maxxed, but my H50 maxxed out enough for me. Edited April 23, 2011 by DanBoTech add pic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumo Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 (edited) 3101A201 *1531 53X max, 5.47Ghz mhz. wall. Edited April 9, 2011 by dumo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eeky NoX Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 (edited) http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1758876 L044B678 *1670 : x56 max, 5463mhz ...not maxxed out yet (under H70) Edited April 14, 2011 by Eeky NoX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWeez Posted April 10, 2011 Share Posted April 10, 2011 3101A482 #1825 = 5.3Ghz http://www.scatteredthorns.co.za/images/localhost/2600k/2600k.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 11, 2011 Author Share Posted April 11, 2011 Updated again: - 103 FPO/steppings - 303 different samples Updated again (+ added binning procedure): - 112 FPO/steppings - 321 different samples Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stivut Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 i7 2600K Batch L101B622 5463MHz http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1763305 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mafio Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 (edited) i7 2500K Batch L045B311 # 4442 maxed out at 5288, no 1 MHZ more p.s. with temperature below -15/20° C it act weird and lose about 200 MHZ. the only good thing is that it's damn strong, I've abused it for more than 30 hours with vcore 1.7 volt at air cooling and still no sign of degrade. Edited April 12, 2011 by Mafio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hampti Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 i7 2600K Batch L101B624 # 1424 53X max and 5328Mhz i7 2600K Batch L102B309 # 2230 53X max and 5300Mhz i7 2600K Batch L040B166 # 1538 53X max and 5332Mhz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUN'G'STAR Posted April 13, 2011 Share Posted April 13, 2011 (edited) 2600K 3103B471 #0438 x54multi #2000 x52multi #2003 x50multi L052A707 #2264 x56multi 5628 http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/6339/559516aida.png L051B163 #1922 x56multi Edited April 13, 2011 by GUN'G'STAR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.