Jump to content

Featured Replies

You guys look like your having all the fun :) Nice results .....

  • Replies 487
  • Views 65.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Max-Hardware_Numb3rs
    Max-Hardware_Numb3rs

    Well guys... I made it https://hwbot.org/submission/4323412_hardware_numb3rs_superpi___32m_ryzen_9_3950x_5min_58sec_909ms?recalculate=true

  • Had a chance today with what LN2 I had left. Took a good 30L in total just today.   So many runs just short of the 6 minute mark for so long, its awesome to have actually done it now.  

  • l0ud_sil3nc3
    l0ud_sil3nc3

    Was just trying the 3800x to see how high fclk went but sadly it's not over 1600 for full pot operation Ended up testing the 16c and thinking outside of the 1:1 box, along with trying a few new

Posted Images

7:41 seems very good, I think for 4600 MHz! Whats your RAM? FlareX?

 

No. I won't bench hardware that i am supposed to review until it has been reviewed. Just a set of trident z.

 

Ryzen effeciency is an odd thing.

 

The above run is slow for 4.6 imo...but fast considering the temp range i am in.

 

Probably best to gauge like this.

 

DI/cascade hardest

Phase hard

Ln2 easier

Air/water easiest

 

Seperate cooling categories then compare by speed.

 

Basically people on ln2 should not be losing to people on phase or cascade...it's very possible for a good chip to beat phase at much lower clocks on air/water.

Edited by chew*

Ok after extensive testing i have come to the conclusion that.

 

1. I am not crazy yet in the sense that i have not completely lost my mind.

 

2. The above run was actually very fast for R5 1400.

 

3. R5 1400 is much slower due to less cache and thus needs way more memory power to match R7.

 

Will show an example in a few.

Edited by chew*

If you notice I pulled 3 secs off time with considerably less memory speed without software tweaking ;)

 

32m%207-49_zpswgsrkkeh.jpg

Above is boot run barely stable just happy it completed...cores were not really happy with 4.6.

 

This is r5 less cache tuned to the max run and better timings...

 

9-8-8%201333_zps6msikn6u.jpg

Edited by chew*

If I have a B350 board with no external clockgen it's legal on win10 right? cuz I got this when doing some testing:

xNgYK4e.png

 

and can't really be bothered setting up win7 right now.

Nah they are blocking all windows 10. Nice work with the b350. I have more fun with that then some of the top tier boards...does what i tell it to do.

Im interesting for future, after the backup to Win7 will be impossible or very, very problematic (as now WinXP at Ryzen). Next generation of CPU will be supporting only win10 at both side or next Windows :) (blue and green side)

It's board\chipset driver limitation. So long as CPU is backwards compatible on board after bios update then no reason you should lose the ability to use the older os.

Take the timing allowance with a grain of salt.

 

K7 needs some bios work if plan on using ref clock plus cold.

 

Those of you willing to work through its fixxable issues try "auto" for multi when using ref clock.

 

Use Ryzen master in windows to bring cpu clock multiplier up to a more desireable level.

Edited by chew*

Maybe things will get interesting now......

 

k7%20beta%201_zpsmzspxlx5.png

 

k7%20beta%202_zpshxca4wr6.png

 

Hi Mr. Chew*

 

Do you mind if I used your screenshot as news item? I'll properly credit your name as source :). And also, is the BIOS already available in public? or still in internal testing domain?

 

Cheers,

Ok so I said 7:3x was possible @ 4.6.

 

Kind of sorry that I have to disappoint you but....I just decided to skip 7:3x....

 

Maybe this will be enough of a poke to get people to actually start running 32m and stop playing footsies with it.

 

Checkmate Charles

 

Moving on to my next victims...

7-29_zpstob1bunw.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...