Jump to content

Wrong Result

THRASHER2
in Submission & member moderation

Featured Replies

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Views 263.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

actually, Massman IS on vacation, he's just too addicted and he found a cybercafé:)

 

Not entirely true, I have internet connection in the house I'm enjoying my vacation :)

Sorry, that was a long time ago when I thought that 3DMark 2006 has the same default resolution. My bad, I just deleted the entry from HWbot myself.

BUT, soon I will bring the result with X6800, at the corect resolution, and I think you know what is going to happen then

 

I have to retract some of the comments I made here. Now I notticed that I ran 3DM2006 in 1024 x 768 because the monitor I use for benching (15" AOC) doesn't support 1280x1024 :rotf: As soon as I change my monitor I will return with some 3DMark 2006 action, until than, no 3DMark 2006 results for me :(

I have to retract some of the comments I made here. Now I notticed that I ran 3DM2006 in 1024 x 768 because the monitor I use for benching (15" AOC) doesn't support 1280x1024 :rotf: As soon as I change my monitor I will return with some 3DMark 2006 action, until than, no 3DMark 2006 results for me :(

 

Bring it on! :battle:

jmke: how? when I install 3DM2006 it will not allow me to set the resolution higher that 1024x768. I have nothing against starring at a black screen:D

 

pointhore: I will, I will :evil: . I suppose you like my 3DM 2001 score :D

when I install 3DM2006 it will not allow me to set the resolution higher that 1024x768.

 

Have you tried installing the monitor drivers?

Have you tried installing the monitor drivers?

 

I have a 15" lcd that does the same it will run 06 but it won't allow it to run at the needed res. I solved it by giving my GF the 15" and taking her 17" lol.

Thx for the advice guys. No, I haven't tried installing the monitor drivers, but I will :D

It's back again. Scanned by hwbot.

Seems to be an on-going problem. Probably another six or eight top twenty entries in the 3d benches without FM verification links.

5 days ago I wrote a post, but no reaction.

Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016

 

category - WinPrime1024.

1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869

 

there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID:

Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid)

 

and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results.

Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz

(and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 )

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320.

 

Sorry for my bad english.

Roger that...I only have 1 4400+ and it is a Brisbane :D

 

Would you mind editing the scores, btw?;)

 

Not 100% sure I will ever be able to break those scores lol. Depends on the VX's I'm getting and how coldbugged my CPU is:)

Would you mind editing the scores, btw?;)

 

Not 100% sure I will ever be able to break those scores lol. Depends on the VX's I'm getting and how coldbugged my CPU is:)

Done....
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634840

 

Another score by Titul without visible resolution settings and FM link....Would anyone please solve this? And the one I posted above (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858

 

The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid.)

 

Thank you!

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858

 

The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid.

 

Fixed

Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz

(and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 )

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320.

 

Sorry for my bad english.

 

Massman: You see my message?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing