Massman Posted August 10, 2007 Posted August 10, 2007 jmke said: actually, Massman IS on vacation, he's just too addicted and he found a cybercafé Not entirely true, I have internet connection in the house I'm enjoying my vacation
Monstru Posted August 11, 2007 Posted August 11, 2007 Quote Sorry, that was a long time ago when I thought that 3DMark 2006 has the same default resolution. My bad, I just deleted the entry from HWbot myself. BUT, soon I will bring the result with X6800, at the corect resolution, and I think you know what is going to happen then I have to retract some of the comments I made here. Now I notticed that I ran 3DM2006 in 1024 x 768 because the monitor I use for benching (15" AOC) doesn't support 1280x1024 :rotf: As soon as I change my monitor I will return with some 3DMark 2006 action, until than, no 3DMark 2006 results for me
pointhore Posted August 11, 2007 Posted August 11, 2007 Monstru said: I have to retract some of the comments I made here. Now I notticed that I ran 3DM2006 in 1024 x 768 because the monitor I use for benching (15" AOC) doesn't support 1280x1024 :rotf: As soon as I change my monitor I will return with some 3DMark 2006 action, until than, no 3DMark 2006 results for me Bring it on! :battle:
choco13 Posted August 11, 2007 Posted August 11, 2007 wrong result! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627492 it must be SLI. not single
Monstru Posted August 12, 2007 Posted August 12, 2007 jmke: how? when I install 3DM2006 it will not allow me to set the resolution higher that 1024x768. I have nothing against starring at a black screen:D pointhore: I will, I will :evil: . I suppose you like my 3DM 2001 score
harleybro Posted August 12, 2007 Posted August 12, 2007 No FM link and is HOF top 20: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631840
SF3D Posted August 12, 2007 Posted August 12, 2007 harleybro said: No FM link and is HOF top 20: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631840 Fixed! Thanks harleybro.
Maxi Posted August 12, 2007 Posted August 12, 2007 Monstru said: when I install 3DM2006 it will not allow me to set the resolution higher that 1024x768. Have you tried installing the monitor drivers?
harleybro Posted August 13, 2007 Posted August 13, 2007 Maxi said: Have you tried installing the monitor drivers? I have a 15" lcd that does the same it will run 06 but it won't allow it to run at the needed res. I solved it by giving my GF the 15" and taking her 17" lol.
Just Learnin' Posted August 13, 2007 Posted August 13, 2007 No CPU-Z in his CPU-Z screenshot, he hasn't got it in his SuperPi runs either, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559994 No screenshot for this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=501281 Or this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506743
harleybro Posted August 13, 2007 Posted August 13, 2007 harleybro said: No FM link and is HOF top 20: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631840 It's back again. Scanned by hwbot.
Monstru Posted August 13, 2007 Posted August 13, 2007 Thx for the advice guys. No, I haven't tried installing the monitor drivers, but I will
Praz Posted August 13, 2007 Posted August 13, 2007 harleybro said: It's back again. Scanned by hwbot. Seems to be an on-going problem. Probably another six or eight top twenty entries in the 3d benches without FM verification links.
Potapicus Posted August 13, 2007 Posted August 13, 2007 5 days ago I wrote a post, but no reaction. Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results.
knopflerbruce Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_302 RyderOCZ's wprime scores (32m and probably 1024m) are very nice, but in the wrong place;) At least the 32m score is a Brisbane (I checked the link). There is no link to the 1024m score, just a checksum. However, the results are pretty similar (like same CPU freq), so I'm pretty sure both are Brisbane cores.
RyderOCZ Posted August 14, 2007 Posted August 14, 2007 Roger that...I only have 1 4400+ and it is a Brisbane
klopcha Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz (and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 ) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320. Sorry for my bad english.
Monstru Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid.
knopflerbruce Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 RyderOCZ said: Roger that...I only have 1 4400+ and it is a Brisbane Would you mind editing the scores, btw? Not 100% sure I will ever be able to break those scores lol. Depends on the VX's I'm getting and how coldbugged my CPU is:)
Monstru Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634840 Another score by Titul without visible resolution settings and FM link....Would anyone please solve this? And the one I posted above (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid.) Thank you!
RyderOCZ Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 knopflerbruce said: Would you mind editing the scores, btw? Not 100% sure I will ever be able to break those scores lol. Depends on the VX's I'm getting and how coldbugged my CPU is:) Done....
Massman Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Monstru said: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634840 Another score by Titul without visible resolution settings and FM link....Would anyone please solve this? And the one I posted above (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid.) Thank you! Monstru said: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid. Fixed
klopcha Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 klopcha said: Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz (and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 ) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320. Sorry for my bad english. Massman: You see my message?
Massman Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 klopcha said: Massman: You see my message? fixed
Recommended Posts