Eeky NoX Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 You became Franck's assistant now Chris? How much project are you involved in atmo? Impressive... Nice job btw Quote
TaPaKaH Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Christian likes to put his nose (read - help) into everything Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 12, 2012 Author Posted July 12, 2012 Last version of CPU-Z is online, free of clocks reading bugs, please use this one (1.61.2) and not previous ones, support for 1.60.x and 1.61.0/1 will be dropped shortly http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z/versions-history.html If you have any weird behavior please report here, thanks for your help. Bugs fixed: Trinity memory clock reading (was divided by 2) AMD Bulldozer/K10 clock reading (multi bug, htt bug, oc bug and so) LGA775 multiplier higher than stock one causing false clock reading on unlocked processors Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Unfortunately, it's bugged for me again. Will report back with more details. Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Ok, uploaded some screenshot on imgur - http://imgur.com/a/KvRl0 Explaining one by one, although it's visible what i did. System info - Phenom II X2 555 unlocked to B55, running at 3.8, 2.8 cpu-nb and 1600 memory Crosshair IV Formula, Windows 7 x64 Ultimate 1. set multi on first core one notch up, resulting in 3.9GHz for the first core only, cpuz thinks I've reduced the fsb by 5-6MHz 2. multi set to lowest x4, cpuz thinks I've increased the fsb to 953Mhz, which leads to memory at 3813 (DDR3-7626) and uncore at 13.34GHz 3. fsb set to 205, nothing happens on cpu-z. TurboEVO crashed 4. multi on first core set to 1 notch down (0.5x), fsb goes 6MHz up according to cpuz 5. Correct 24/7 settings Opening cpuz after setting multi/fsb doesn't change a bit, still reads wrong clocks Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 12, 2012 Author Posted July 12, 2012 da fuck we fixed this bug, seems I have to do more testings. put back AMD config brb Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 12, 2012 Author Posted July 12, 2012 I just can't reproduce your bug, can you please try without unlocking the CPU ? Maybe it's due to CPU unlock, if so then I have to grab an unlockable CPU and we have to calibrate CPUZ again on it. Damn you microsoft Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 No difference, mate. Setting first core to x4 multi, fsb goes to 953, second core to 18GHz, memory at 3813 Quote
knopflerbruce Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 You guys are making great progress anyway. Hopefully the last few bugs will be gone soon Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 12, 2012 Author Posted July 12, 2012 Yeah me too working on it maybe we fix infrared's one tomorrow Quote
just_nuke_em Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Hmm, ran an unlocked yesterday with no problem, checked it against cpuz 1.58. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2436088 Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 12, 2012 Author Posted July 12, 2012 Might be due to infrared's old bios he is using on his motherboard Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Which bios version? I'm running 0905. This is by far the most stable for my board and I don't want to change to newest, cause I can't revert back. Quote
Moose83 Posted July 12, 2012 Posted July 12, 2012 I use an Gigabyte 990FX UD3 and have same Problems with 960T, it doesn't matter how many cores i use. Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 12, 2012 Author Posted July 12, 2012 I use an Gigabyte 990FX UD3 and have same Problems with 960T, it doesn't matter how many cores i use. can you give us some more info about the setup ? CPUZ 1.61.2 ? if so please send a report.txt non bugged and a report.txt bugged (tell me the real clocks or what clocks should be read) to christian [at] hwbot.org . Many Thanks Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 13, 2012 Author Posted July 13, 2012 infrared's bug corrected (because old K10 /= new K10 (tech stuff)) Zambezi memory clock x2 bug corrected (was only meant for Tirnity but mistakes happen) Build in progress Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 13, 2012 Author Posted July 13, 2012 New build online, still named 1.61.2 though Quote
mr.paco Posted July 16, 2012 Posted July 16, 2012 My turn. I have a Pentium Pro 200 and versions from 1.60 up to 1.61.2 do not fully support the cpu, the ram or the motherboard. And I get the following report when trying to validate Better support in version 1.59, still no motherboard but at least it shows the cpu n ram speeds but of course cant validate because its an older version Why is support for ANY cpu removed when making a newer version? How would I go about submitting my runs with the above issues? Quote
mr.paco Posted July 16, 2012 Posted July 16, 2012 This is on my 965be on M4N78Pro. its sourpose to be all stock speeds..... http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2440243 Did some one fall a sleep at the controls ? How are we to go forward with so many issues with the main validation tool used? Quote
ShrimpBrime Posted July 16, 2012 Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) I'm losing speed with the New 1.61.2 revision here. Can I please use the far more stable 1.60 and see if we can get cpu-z to get the validator to comply with 1.60 until the comp is over or they have something stable. Getting cpu speed readouts as low as 26.xx mhz... Here's an example of a 4mhz loss. The speed is constantly moving around as well. EDIT: Also the new cpu-z rev. can not see my windows oc. I find it useless at this point. See pics below. Thanks for any help yes? Edited July 16, 2012 by ShrimpBrime Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 18, 2012 Author Posted July 18, 2012 This is on my 965be on M4N78Pro. its sourpose to be all stock speeds..... http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2440243 Did some one fall a sleep at the controls ? How are we to go forward with so many issues with the main validation tool used? Should be ok in the last build (also named 1.61.2) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.