Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

HWBOT R5 Bugs/Features 2.0 - Report bugs or request new HWBOT features here


Massman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 404
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you don't add a canardpc-link it asks for an x86-secret link (change to canardpc). This works for CPUz, and maybe refclock/memclock as well?

 

Hm, not sure what you mean. But yeah, the behavior for CPU Frequency is the same as for ref clock and memory clock.

 

Team history is bugged:

http://forum.hwbot.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=1647&stc=1&d=1384379564

These members are not from my team. And it would be nice to have team ranking history along with team points history (so that when you point to a certain time stamp, you can see both points and the ranking you've had).

 

Added to buglist: bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1263

 

Next bug, im loosing global and WR in Aquamark, in submission im 4th, on WR Rankings im 3rd :P Please fix it :D

 

http://abload.de/thumb/1c7ujy.jpg

 

http://abload.de/thumb/266ugo.jpg

 

Seems fixed?

 

The VGA name is so long - INTEL GMA X3100 (GM965, GME965, GL960, GLE960) - that it breaks the formatting:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10046731/Forum%20Attachments/HWBOT/Screenshot%202013-11-15%2016.13.58.png

 

When trying to upload a system picture from an URL rather than local disk:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10046731/Forum%20Attachments/HWBOT/Screenshot%202013-11-15%2016.03.22.png

 

1) Added to buglist: bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1263

 

2) Might be an issue with the url formatting? It says image/png, not .png.

 

This is still unresolved, there are many guys ranked in the OCL top thirty with 30-50 too many League points than they should have.

 

We have this issue in our backlog already.

 

Something that happens with aquamark scores, even tho the exact hardware name string is passed:

 

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10046731/Forum%20Attachments/HWBOT/cpuc_completion_bug_aqua.png

 

An item in the database does not mean it is recognised via the API. Those are two different things. We have a database with all the hardware items (in this case CPU), and then a separate database for linking the hardware strings from an API request to that aforementioned hardware database.

 

So the item is in our database, but was not linked yet to be supported via API. I did this manually now, so it should be working now.

 

notRecognised.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I try to search fastest SPi 32M LGA771 result(http://url.hwbot.org/1i4iU4i), it shows me that GENiEBEN is fastest, but he is only 5th in QX9775 category. When I narrow my search(adding QX9775 in cpu model), that shows me, that there are only 2 submissions in SPi 32m with QX9775. If you look at QX9775 you will se that it's 8 result there. Other can be found with LGA775 and QX9775 filter, which absolutely wrong. If reason of this bug is in wrong define of socket for QX9775 before, and after changes old submissions still got LGA775 and new - 771, it may happen in other categories(LGA2011 moved to LGA1356, s603 moved to s604, etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You understand what I mean now? :) Probably an easy fix, though... and not really a huge problem.

 

Ah I see. Yeah, small issue but added it anyway.

 

http://bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1265

 

When I try to search fastest SPi 32M LGA771 result(http://url.hwbot.org/1i4iU4i), it shows me that GENiEBEN is fastest, but he is only 5th in QX9775 category. When I narrow my search(adding QX9775 in cpu model), that shows me, that there are only 2 submissions in SPi 32m with QX9775. If you look at QX9775 you will se that it's 8 result there. Other can be found with LGA775 and QX9775 filter, which absolutely wrong. If reason of this bug is in wrong define of socket for QX9775 before, and after changes old submissions still got LGA775 and new - 771, it may happen in other categories(LGA2011 moved to LGA1356, s603 moved to s604, etc).

 

Good catch! There were about 48k results in the database where the CPU socket in the result table was different from the socket in the cpu model table. This happens when the CPU socket is changed after the result was made. We should add an automatic updater for that.

 

Anyway, your search query should be correct now :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

hwbot_1day_23_hoursk1fpc.jpg

I guess one day is just enough to beat 23 hours, so that's no real challenge. However 23 hours to beat one day would require some overclocking skills for sure. :banana: On a serious note I've noticed that some challange texts are bugged and an amount of hours is shown instead of the user name. Maybe it is connected to the time left for a competition, but that's just a wild guess. However I really had a good laugh about this one. :D

 

Examples:

http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013/

http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013_2/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I noticed the bug with total points. When I submit new score, everything is ok, my points are updated very quickly. But, if I lose points, I had to make manual recalculation, otherwise numer of total points still stay the same.

 

We are aware of that issue; it is in the backlog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://abload.de/img/hwbot_1day_23_hoursk1fpc.jpg

I guess one day is just enough to beat 23 hours, so that's no real challenge. However 23 hours to beat one day would require some overclocking skills for sure. :banana: On a serious note I've noticed that some challange texts are bugged and an amount of hours is shown instead of the user name. Maybe it is connected to the time left for a competition, but that's just a wild guess. However I really had a good laugh about this one. :D

 

Examples:

http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013/

http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013_2/

 

Added to buglist: http://bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1293

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hola Massman and other fine staff. With the new login window, I can no longer log in to my account. I do not have Google, Facebook or any other social network accounts, but the only other option is to register. I'm already registered. :) I don't see another option for just a plain old login. I am on an iPhone 5, Safari via iOS 6, my favorite platform for forum browsing and watching my global points slowly trickle away. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Are you using mobile version? On desktop version the orange Login button at top works, although I can see that Safari on iOS 6.1.3 renders poorly and the fields to enter credentials are hidden

 

Sounds like a small bug, can you screenshot ?

 

Also a bug, not sure if registered already:

http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/1884701/

 

Added: http://bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1351

 

My sub isn't getting any points or ranking?

Also this is my best sub to date.

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2493801_

 

Hm, good question. I can't seem to trigger the recalculation.

 

Can you try submitting it regularly? So not linked to the contest.

 

Bump ^^

 

Also, can the tapatalk signature be enabled?

 

Added to buglist

 

http://bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1352

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...