Submission & member moderation

Hello, An hwbot crew member, Monstru, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'incorrect submission'. This was the reason the user gave: Checked You can view your result here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861178 You can find out more about the reporting user here: http://hwbot.org/community/user/Monstru and one more, both 9800GT single/sli 3dm Vantage I did not use physX pls explain Thank you

I think packet may be right so could you check this guys? I would need the 2 to compare not just the top 100. lmao sorry man here http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=861420 and http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=856432 same score same gear diff team? is that allowed? im fairly new thanks

...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=847321 >500 fps in GT1 on Radeon 9550? Omfg... Please delete this result or ban user.... grrr. Maybe someone should check other his results. Sorry in my opinion such results should ban user

209 points from 295 points in the last day I would fall approximately 80 hw points have diminishing, but the report does not appear in my edilipte deleted points .. What is the job of the original .. that many points where I lost 2 days .. my user link http://hwbot.org/community/user/KAPTAN54

Hey there, http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=848110 I just noticed that my submission fell off the face of the net lol. Can I get this back? Thanks, Rev

Hello, short question? Why is in one category 2 or 3 Gold, Silver and Bronze Cups ? New points arrangement???? This category for example Link Gold for OCPerformance (Xpert-OC-Team) real Nummer 1 doublee (Guru3D) is Nummer 5 dark destroyer (DevHardware) is Nummer 6 Silver for Drazendead (JMax-Hardware) real Number 2 DoubleE (XtremeSystems) only Number 5 Vediovis (H.O.T. (Hellas O/C Team)) only Number 21 Bronze for PCGH_Carsten (PC Games Hardware) real Number 3 stealth (H.O.T. (Hellas O/C Team)) only Number 22 Got Double points DoubleE (XtremeSystems) doublee (Guru3D) Same Score und Hardware P…

Couple of my guys are having different interpretations regarding the rules for submitting 3DMark scores: Interpretation 1: -All scores must have the screenshot, regardless of valid ORB link. Top 20 must have both. Interpretation 2: -You can submit either the screenshot or a valid ORB link. If you have a valid ORB link, a screenshot is not necessary. Top 20 must have the ORB link. Can a mod clarify which is correct? Thanks, ~ether

Hy, My Aquamarkscore is blocked by the crewmember Neoforce becourse there is no Memory screen from CPU-Z. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745227 Your own rules say that this is optional and not requierd for a valid screen. Can you explain why the score is blocked? Thanks

Had 2 of my submissions blocked (single gtx 295 05 and 06) Have edited the submissions and added orb links. Please unblock. Thanks.

Good Day Mods , Please mods can you guys check this scores made by this user ? It seems that a cheat was used or a bug of some kind in 03 , but his scores are wayyyyyyyyyy out of the ordinary for such low clocks on cpu and gpu on AIR compared with everybody else with higher clocks .Those scores are impossible with his set up , configuration and low clocks. Hes using a E8400 cpu @ 4250Mhz on AIR and his GTX 285 GPU @ 780/1359Mhz on AIR and his score magically shoot up to 96,555 in 3DMark03 , he also got a few other scores with wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy out of the ordinary but only in 3DMark03 , in no other benchmark hes good at it ONLY in 03 only because he found a chea…

Hi, new member here...I submitted a vantage single card run that I think was good for 16th, but it doesn't show up on the top 20 ranking. Do I have to wait until it is validated my a moderator or did I do something wrong? Here's the submission. Thanks for your help.

What do we do when CPUZ mis-identifies a given processor? JMKE mentioned recently that it sometimes does that. We were discussing a bench posted by another user and it turned out CPUZ had incorrectly Identified that user's Palomino MP as a Thoroughbred XP. JMKE implied CPUZ can mis-identify other processors as well. As of today, I'm a believer. I was benching an AMD Athlon MP 2200+ AMSN2200DKT3C. It was properly identified by CPUZ as an MP processor up to around 150FSB. At 160FSB and higher, CPUZ wrongly identifies the processor as a Sempron. That's with CPUZ verison 1.50, BTW. What I'm planning to do is explain that in the "Description" box where we …

Are these from the same user under different names? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810931 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803993'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803993 Same mobo, CPU and GFX cards and both captains of the team? Also the score for this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803993 doesn't jive with the GFX card and CPU speeds in the screenshot.

My score ( radeon 9550 SE) is blocked , this submit data December 6 of 2007, are block today, this score is 1.7 years ago !!! also no longer have this Video (she is dead, she sleep like an angel:D) Today (Rules) is in error of screen, but in December 2007 was not an error http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672681 Many times, members of hwbot's crew, said : "...bench with more than 6 months old are not moderated...." Besides, look the other's bench's with this video, same date and correct bench's , all ok in resolution and the rest...was one of the best videos I've had Thank's Sw Ps: are many old AquaMark score's without Gpu-z, and cpu-z…

Hi - I really (really) want to post this score - but cant get a link off the orb (have also sent an email to futuremark support) My runs for 05 and 06 were okay for the same setup, so not sure what the issue is? Appreciate any help / advice on this

Just curious, what is the best way to handle if you "think" you spotted a cheated score. As I understand the way would be to post it here - but that posting this in public might hurt that person without the cheat being 100% confirmed. You're not supposed to contact hwbot mods about this - right?

oi! You prolly saw this already? Unless there's a new model out I haven't heard of this is still a 965.. (at least that's what it says in the CPU-Z screens) http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=Core+i7+960+(12)&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1885&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minT…

Sorry that i have to start a thread here.. I did a mistake today - was benching all the night and very tired - so i posted my 3DMark05 Result in 3DMark06 category. After posting i saw my mistake and reported this to hwbot team. Someone moved my result from 3D06 category to 3D05 - thanks for that... But the score is already blocked. In the report stands that i need a FM Link (cause its a top 20 score) but it is not a top 20 score (not in 3D05 category) Can you please check this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861993 Thanks Afrokalle

Great result Massman and a Fantastic clock speed , but I thought the CPU had to belong to the person submitting the result, as this CPU belongs to Intel and you benched this with Pt1t at the GOOC Event I cannot see how you could have submitted it as you're a mod here and know the rules or am I mistaken here can we all use any CPU or GFX cards we want now. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861202

You know me!.... When I see the "odd" I just CAN'T shut my mouth.... May I ask something? Isn't the below benches the EXACT SAME except of the rams they used? Am I blind or something? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=854732 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=853323 EVEN the DESKTOP ICONS are in the EXACT SAME ORDER......! AM I blind?.... You could say: different cpu and different rams....OK yes...BUT the EXACT SAME DESKTOP ?..... At least change the order of the desktop icons before you screen capture it..... ......and we are NOT talking about USERS from DIFFERENT teams BUT for users of the SAME TEAM.... Isn't this called: …

As i benched my good old 7800GS i was totally confused about some results. Hardwarespecs say that the 7800GS had a pipeline configuration of 16/6 (G70 or G71 Core). But in the normal 7800GS subcategory there many results of "pimped" 7800GS aka Gainward 7800GS+ (24/8 with G71) and 7800GS GLH (20/7 with G70 and G71!!!). For example this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=800127 Or even this one: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=816811 Is it possible to remove this cards into another category? Because that are not normal ones and its nearly impossible to get good scores with a real "7800GS". I mean even 8800GT and 9800GT had their own categorys - wtf? Sam…

I know hwbot need ORB link, but the problem is futuremark. What can I do? ORB cannot make "unknow cpu" to public link. It's not my problem. Block reason is "ORB link required for TOP20 results". Are you sure it's ONLY me? Or that guy only pointed to me. Andre

Can any moderator recheck my scores and unblock them please? I made some small error in the validation of the scores, but if you understand the benches and compare them against other scores, you know they are correct http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774236 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=767928 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=773892 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=767926 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774309 A lot of thanks in advance

We have probably all seen the large boost Windows 7 gives in 3DMark 03. For a while, I was under the impression submissions in '03 with windows 7 werent allowed. Has that changed? an 8800GT would gain a good 7K....every leaderboard will be drastically changed.