Submission & member moderation

As the title suggest, I'd like to know why photos are not allowed here. I did that to save some time because of the damn coldbug freeze problem on AMD CPUs. My scores are clearly visible in the pictures. Blocked score #1: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671222 (this one was first blocked,then approved, and then re-blocked(!!) ) Blocked score #2: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671223 Now, please tell me, what reasons are there to block these scores? Sure, I'm probably one of very few people who do this from time to time, but just because others don't do it is no reason to block the scores. If you go here: http://www.hwbot.org/init.results.subm…

Flame me all you like, this needs to be said. a legal score- a mip cheat score- someone elses score- http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/9218/2003zs2.jpg the recorded clockspeeds are 4130MHz 598/740. Either the clockspeeds are BS or the score is BS. No-one else in the category can match the performance per clock. Moving onto 3D05- a mip cheat score- Someone elses score- http://img506.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2005eq6.jpg reported clockspeeds are 3850MHz 586/685

Hey guys! I just got a 3DMark 2003 score blocked or deleted, probably for a controversial reason My question was....if (from whatever reason) a score must be blocked or deleted, don't you think it would be fair to notice the user too? I thought this is how things get done ( I never got any score blocked before), and if you have lots of results it's pretty hard to see which one is missing and caused the point loss Regarding why my result was deleted, I would like to ask you guys what happend with the discussion here, and with the suggestions some of us had in that thread, especially the suggestions made in posts #2, #4 and #37 Thx guys

Was this done with MIPMAPS involved...... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716510 CH = HIGH NATURE = VERY HIGH.... Thanks.....

The top 2 3dmark 2003 scores (not naming names or team) maybe hardware sharing (against rules correct?) Same scores (20 points different) Same PSU Same mobo Same CPU (with only a 13Mhz difference in clock speed) Same Gfx Cards (with EXACTLY same clock speeds/ram speeds) I mean if anything says hardware sharing its these 2 results. Both are very respected people (who I also respect) so I am unsure. Someone please correct me, as I sincerely hope I am wrong.

What is the process to report questionable wPrime submissions? For example http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706729. Seems odd that the processor and speed in wPrime and CPUz do not match. Others have problems as well.

Using wPrime on my QX6850 and E8400 have resulted in my submitted results being read as a E6850. Of course I edit them to respect the proper cpu, but it would be cool to see the bug fixed. I am unsure if this issue has been brought up before, so I apologize if I am just bringing up old news. I also had a question, can you use a application like Ifranview to crop and condense your screenshots (for validation)? Or does it have to be a straight desktop screenshot. Thanks in advance! Karma

Hi guys, Just noticed that one of my old runs was blocked for insufficient verification. After moving my site to another server I forgot to re-upload that specific screenshot. I've just edited the result & re-uploaded the screenshot. Could you please unblock it ? Here's the result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593721

Hi, I submitted several results with my Geforce 6800 Ultra AGP. The 4 3Dmark benchmarks were submitted and only the 2001 and 2005 are valid. I can't understand why... Here are the links: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693069 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692246 Can anyone (a modo) tell me why these results have been moderated? Thanks.

Why are almost all the top scores in the 2900pro all showing 2900xt's? I realize you can flash a pro to an xt, but if you do, the score should be submitted as an XT. If you want to score as a pro card, then don't flash to XT. A gpuz shot should be required for all benches submitted without an ORB submission to make sure they are pro cards and not XT's. This is only fair to the guys that want to bench pro's, there is no way of telling a card is a pro that has been flashed or an actual XT.

I keep benching my 8500 on super pi 1m and 32m and all the results I get come out as invalid when I try to validate them on xs. I am not doing anything special just benching 1m and 32m on my pc. Even on 24/7 settings all results keep coming out as invalid - why/how? Now I realized why my 32m result was deleted from my profile but whether you believe or not it was a honest run. As a matter of fact even my 1m run on my profile invalidates... you can remove it as well if you feel to

I dont now why but someone deleted this result. The only reason that i can imagine is that the score has the same result with giorgos.th and exact same checksum(http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676961). Any other reason for complete remove? And its not the first time that happens.

My very old 7950GX2 3Dmark 06 result was delete due to insufficient data on screen. Well it was done nearly a year ago when GPUZ wasn't about. So when some ** Watch your language my friend** (NeoForce) doesn't like it, it get's deleted. I cannot re-bench it as I don't have my quad anymore. So even though it was legitimate using the software of the time (I cannot go back in time) and displayed what was then ok, so can I have it back on there please.?

Hi http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1579 & http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1452 One CPU? Bei beiden handelt es sich um den E2200 Conroe. Bitte mal Fixen. Einen E2220 gibt es noch nicht. Sorry for German.

Hi, just noticed this is listed at a 8800 GTS, it should be a 8800GT. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701640 I dunno if it matters or not. Thanks.

Why are my benches deactivated ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697334 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697338 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697339

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592336 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650027 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656051 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610436 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark05, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610418 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark06, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing

I got a gold medal in 03 with a 3870, I though the result looked way too good so bought 3Dmark 03 and it verified: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5723694 http://www.weescott.co.uk/images/51889_03_3870.jpg Even though I have 2 forms of validation I have deleted this entry as it is obviously not right. Does this happen a lot? People having validation for dodgy scores? Just a fluke? I got all excited too.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 2GHz slower on the CPU, but a full 5 minutes faster? I fail to see how that can be right or possible. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1044&name=Pentium+4+631+%28375%29 (wP 1024)

http://www.hwbot.org/hallOfFame.do?type=result&applicationId=14 Atomic and Kingpin are NOT using QX9770 CPUs in Skulltrail, which makes those results gray area. I appreciate they want the scores up, but its wrong to class them under another CPU name until the 9775s are included in CPU ID.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673564 hiden resolution 13.9 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694536 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 43.2 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694534 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 34.6 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673555 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 24.7 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684107 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing...21.5 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694533 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 10.9 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662060 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 6 …

In category A64 3800+ X2 Toledo (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1369) in wPrime top5 the results are rounded wrong; guys from places 4 and 5 have screenshots with 27,812 sec an 27,906 sec, but they are displayed as 27 seconds sharp. Is it a cheat or just a bug in bot? BTW now I'm 6th

As you can see at http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=486120&page=29 the tag I used for the bot is as follows: "); var _hwbcss = "http://hwbot.org/css/style.external.custom.css"; var _hwb = _hwb || []; _hwb.push(['type=9859 - X2 4400+ @ 2.75ghz - 8800GT 512MB @ stock']); _hwb.push(['params=%2$s']); _hwb.push([_hwbtarget]); (function() { var hwbex = document.createElement('script'); hwbex.type = 'text/javascript'; hwbex.async = true; hwbex.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://') + 'hwbot.org/js/exf2.js'; var s = document.getElementById(_hwbtarget); s.parentNode.insertBefore(hwbe…

Hi, I got an email that one of my 3dMark05 score got blocked for the 7300 GO. Here is the compare URL: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593592 Here is my Orb Verification URL: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2877719 You can see it all matches, the reason I get for the block: 'insufficient verification for rankings'. This was bench back in April of 07. This is a low end card, probably w/o much points. Can any tell me why it was blocked? Ton

I know and appreciate that you have a job to do in regard to keeping results as watertight as possible, but im already getting bored of having results taken down because I can only have one published result active at a time in each benchmark. I will NOT spend money on transient support for Futuremark bench suites just for this convenience. What information would be needed in a screenshot? Score breakdown? ORB page with CPU-Z and GPU-Z windows? I frequently bench with services turned off, so thats not really a valid option. There has to be some middle ground.