Christian Ney

You might want to edit your previous post as well then.

There you go: 83 345 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Next time use those keys: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=137126

@Massman Do you have a list with all applicationId?

http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=160346

http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=160339

Hey, easy there, wasn't me. I actually saw during Computex that most socket 2011/2011-3 motherboards had an error in the db (chipset and/or socket) and I fixed them all manually.

Done.

Okay I see what is wrong the stage should be "PerformanceTest Mobile". I just made the request to change this.

It's the "System Score": Christian Ney`s PerformanceTest Mobile score: 5445 points with a Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC v3 2457MHz

Thanks everyone

I planned to ban everyone but since I am a generous god, I will just ban the people who don't wish me a happy birthday

AMD Athlon II X2 270u exists: AMD Athlon II X2 270u - AD270USCK23GM AMD Athlon II X2 270u is for AMD Athlon II X2 270u 170u unlocked goes in the 170u ranking Yes that is a problem when submitting datafile benchmarks. What to do is refresh the page then you will be able to edit all the fields. Or edit the submission after submitting.

Should be ok now.

I only saw this now: The end is near

Will be done in the next 48 hours. Sorry for the delay.

More to come once Paypal unfreeze my accounts...

Coolers always scratch the HS surface, no matter what you do. That should fall under "normal operation degradation" (I dont remember the exact term).

That's correct they can scan the CPUs. Even if you send them a sanded/lapped processor, they can identify it. The problem here is that they consider the HS to be physically damaged enough. What you could try to play with is this: - The processor was not physically damaged. - The TIM used was Liquid Metal type and this is the reason why the HS looks like this. - You tried to clean it as much as you could without damaging the processor and this is the result. - They can identify the processor. => The processor was not sanded, those are not sanding marks but TIM residue you didn't want to remove in fear of physically damage it. Ask them politely to clean it This is Intel's Warranty Policy for Processors: http://download.intel.com/support/processors/sb/Limited_Warranty_8.5x11_for_Web_English.pdf This is the only reason I can find why they rejected it: "where the original identification markings have been removed, altered or obliterated". But technically, the markings have not been removed nor altered nor obliterated, the markings are just below a layer of TIM. EDIT: Just read the part where you cleaned it with The Stilt's solution. Now it looks way better, just like a CPU with some concrete TIM you find in OEM. If they reject it again because it was previously rejected. Kindly ask them to reconsider since they were wrong the first time and now you managed to clean it better. You could even link them the thread as a last resort.

Faith in community restored. @TheMadDutchDude, to answer your question, I thought about this: If less than 1600€ are raised: Do 50/50. If more than 1600€ are raised: Give 800 to Rosty and the rest to Pulse88. If more than 1855€ (800+1000+55(paypal3%)) are raised: Stop the fundraising. How much as been donated right now? Ho, forgot to mention, count me in

Of course, this is stock, there was no overclocking that was made.

Dimastech filed for bankruptcy: http://www.portalecreditori.it/procedura.php?id=166358&&gc_lng=inglese

The hardware here is not interesting. The LN2 on the other end is going away fast

1.- Yes, you can clearly see it in the fps. 2.- Afaik there is also a way to disable it "driver wise". The result is the same. 3.- Verification link is still mandatory for global top-20. This hasn't changed. The only thing that changed is that you no longer need system info enabled.

21.05 - 11.06 See you there.