ObscureParadox

D9WFN or M perhaps?

oh really? Seems a bit odd for micron to use a competitors IC instead of their own.

As does the fact he's put a picture of the Ballistix in the submission

Only thing I can imagine is that there might have been a dodgy voltage going through the PCI-E lane on that card which fed back to the CPU and killed the board etc. Seems really strange and quite unlucky though

How in the fuck did you manage that?

Just curious with the ram speed and timings etc, was 1:2 ratio not possible with that FSB?

Just slow down a little and give us old timers a chance

Unreal efficiency sir, great score! :)

Which cooler are you using then? 90+ without any overclocking is pretty high, somethings not quite right here. Can you maybe take a picture of your rig for us?

he means the score needs to be shown as "valid" on the 3dmark site, i.e. we need to follow their rules also, so no tesselation modification.

To be fair, when the new OpenCL came out for GPU-Pi, we didn't remove all old scores back then or create a seperate ranking, we just accepted that it was part of the benchmark and got on with it. I also don't know how you'll go about moderating the XTU scores if you have two seperate rankings considering it's the most popular benchmark by far. Unless the submission system can detect which version has been used and therefor always put you in the right catagory by default, I see XTU being completely unmanigable thereafter.

it's not an important piece of information for a memory benchmark result so I wouldn't worry about it too much

That explains so much...... I thought I was going crazy

Time to get some LN2 on this bad boy and truly max it out I think :D

Although I highly doubt anything will be done about it, it might be worth sending the files through to the CPU-Z developers as I imagine there will be a new revision out shortly anyway with the new AMD CPUs on the horizon.

Sorry sir, but the invite was specifically for Seal3fast

It might be interesting to have the Div 6 and 7 limitations be 4GHz for CPU (to give Ryzen users a chance) but then no limitations on the GPU, would make for an intersting battle that would be more GPU based limit than CPU. Although I would understand if having sub zero temps on the GPU would go against the ethos of those divisions.

I think we all know how poor AMD sensors work at low temperatures compared to high temps so I know for a fact the temperature will be fine. But just to cover yourself why not just up the temperature by around 2-3c to ensure that the sensor won't bug below 0c, your CPU should easily do those clocks with only 2c more.

You also need to hope that the memory controller can deal with high MHz etc, but yeah I had a similar idea to you and have practiced removing chips on a dead card Although not too successfully might I add....

Why win the board you're already competing with? + It's a nice change and adds a new challenge. I like the fact it won't just be the standard TUSL2-C boards etc May the best chipset win!

Very strong, nice score

I know this is not a discussion thread, but have you tested to make sure that the E6750 isn't faulty?

No worries sir, no rush

Epowered ready for up to 80A of Juice

I could tell you who the winner is going to be too, but I don't want to put other people off competing with me