FireKillerGR

Niiiiiice, GJ

i5 6600K - 1.136v VID - ES (dont remember the batch - will update post later to add it) Needs 1.32v to boot @Win8 and run spi1m @5 Ghz, and same voltage for 4.9 Cinebench on air. Under cascade (-88C load on cascade's evap.) it did 5.8 GHz cinebench @1.536v load. Not delided

euxaristo man

thanks bro.

thanks guys. I think 2050+/2175+ is possible, just need more Ln2 ^^

Thanks Nacho, will do. @Barti27, yes you are right; I used X99 Champion but since I used the "prepopulate fields by previous submission" it kept the RIVE from the previous session.

Thanks guys. Hell yeah, humidity broke a record today

bagging time lolz. Congrats

"Photo of the carnage" LMFAO

nice cpu and score bro; congrats

Migh be interested in: VGA : 4.The happy trio of 5870 (Soc+Lightning+Matrix) -250 euro as a package deal 8.Gtx 560 Dcu2 -80 euro 9.Gtx 280 good clocker on air - 50 euro + One REX Total price?

Thanks Gigabyte got my prize as well.

measure vMEM on both gpus

voltage for this frequency?

SOLD to sagayagao

replied

Hello everyone, I am selling a Corsair Plat Dom 2666 10-12-12 kit which can do 2800 MHz 9-12-12-1T with tight timings with less than 1.955v voltage on air. 2 sticks (the ones which can run Spi32m tight cl9 with 1.935v real - measured with fluke during load) are already insulated (plastik spray - not dip) but NEVER benched subzero. The other 2 sticks from the same kit run on the same settings with a small voltage increase (1.95v - 1.954v real measured with fluke during load) are still with stock heatsinks (no subzero on these as well). All sticks are working as new and come with box and fan. Buyer covers the shipping and Paypal fees. Price: 330 Euros for all 4 sticks. Insulated ones: http://i.imgur.com/3QR2My3.jpg (real 1.94v - can also run with 1.934v) Non-insulated ones: http://i.imgur.com/Xo2gnIg.jpg (real 1.954v) As for the RTL difference, its random (each boot -> different RTL on Auto) hehe Photos: http://i.imgur.com/gz4Jn6V.jpg https://scontent-fra3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xta1/v/t34.0-12/11329027_10206838657354734_524408981_n.jpg?oh=eaafc66407cba6c97c387ffba75611d7&oe=557064AF

Damn, feel sorry about the mobo. GG & WP indeed (from your side as well). Have a save flight to Taipei, enjoy.

Nice one Ian

Thanks Adrien, much appreciated.

Based on what Phil posted. On my 2852 score (which should be considered as Legit from all of you I guess) I got 14.26 FPS on GT1 @2090.3 MHz. On Coldest's score GT 1 (which is mostly Core depended for the last 2-3 years as far as I know and also the easiest to get "bugged" as far as Demac said) he got 14.72 FPS @1920.2 MHz - +0.5 FPS with -170 MHz on core and -100 MHz on mem. On Demac's 3057 Score GT1 = 16.10 FPS at 2142.6 FPS (+2 FPS with just +50 MHz) and on his 3122 Points score GT = 16.78 FPS @2168.7 (+2.5 FPS with +80 MHz). At stock the FPS / (default) MHz ratio should be > than FPS / OCed MHz ratio cause everyone knows that if you double the frequency you wont get double the GT Score (I got 0.0068 FPS per MHz on my legit OCed score while I had 0.0083~ ratio at default). These scores have more than 0.0075 FPS per MHz (after years of running FS I dont know that you could have such impact on the GT score on the same freq and card) and some even have 0.00773 if my calculations are correct. So we are talking about almost the perfect efficiency (perfect scaling from stock clocks to increased clocks)!

Nah Allen, I get screen everytime but with many artifacts (of course I can see the image/benchmark test). Also voltage is set 1.65v~ from evbot which is 1.73 - 1.75v load @ -135C.

I would NOT disagree but as I mentioned earlier a very close example is LOD on 01 as it changes the graphics (quality) of the frames which will be rendered and can give more than 20% fps increase without touching the clocks.

Actually I think that the truth is somewhere between the two sides. On the one hand, yeah the score boost is actually obvious but on the other hand this happens every single time (!) when we run the card at 2150~ + with temp & voltage used @2.09 GHz. In other words, it doesnt happen every 1 run out of 5. Also the scaling from 2150 to 2210 MHz would be considered as normal (between two "bugged" runs). Furthermore, commenting on what you said about rendering pixels I think whats happening is as legit as LOD can be. With LOD you change actually the "difficulty" (quality) of the gonna-be-rendered frames which is almost the same (we dont know for sure what happens at these clocks - at least I dont) with what happens here. Now, for the guys who will say that LOD doesnt make such impact; please re-consider by thinking about 8xxx/9xxx NV series on 3D01 Nature (if I remember correctly) when you would earn at least 200 FPS (from 450-500 default to 700-750 FPS on the same clocks) by applying LOD. Last but not least, from my side its also up to FM, as its getting paid for each license. In other words, in that cost, "security" against bugs & cheats is included and as far as I can see my score is invalid based on benchmark owner's rules. On this part, I dont know you and you dont know me. Which means that you can also work for NASA, CSI, FBI or w/e you want. But IF you are a mod (or mod assistant, etc.) I think it would be better to go through PM, email or facebook (as Christian did) and dont post stuff like "you will removed if your dont do what I say" & "So it is a bugged result no matter". IMO you handled the communication part terribly as you insulted someone (even if that someone doesnt really care about your online insults and how much you fail to deal with controversial submissions) online which could hurt his own rep. Cheers

When I am talking about chase I am talking about chasing in order to get a "bugged" run, which I didnt do. BUT if you are talking about the general rule, then yes, overclocking is "chasing" the performance inrceasement (oh well we are @ hwbot.org). And no, I have no time to re-bench at that point and the results I posted are at least 2-3 days old.