-
Posts
1718 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by GtiJason
-
There are better tools/ways to mod bios for this board, just have not had time to look into making a new bios with proper vcore out the box My newest bios I think is X14e, everything I have is here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gYfGs1ClsBDgqdOXnzwhR179G5xxre18?usp=drive_link Link for MOCF 7.51JrevAA https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pc0FcorPknJLEL4b36bmrSt_wSWpMqhH/view?usp=drive_link
-
7.51JrevAA https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pc0FcorPknJLEL4b36bmrSt_wSWpMqhH/view?usp=drive_link I'll upload a few files to drive and send a link. Not sure if 7.51G or similar is better. Maybe even 7.60 ?, My working MOCF is minty fresh so only quickly tested my SL 5.3 GHz Delidded L740D159 8700K but didn't want to risk burning pin(s) EDIT: I see 7.51G is still available to DL so I'll look for the J version on old SSD Here's the "Splave" 7.51G info
-
Are most cards able to hit 1000 core pre mod ? All the cards Ive tested were 900 - 960 but at stock V. The cards (Mostly Giga WF OC) I currently have non I2C controllable IC's aka NCP5395T that needs vid and ocp modding. Should have bought the non OC edition or anything else actually. Mostr have I2C with the CHIL pwm
-
Seby9123 - DDR5 SDRAM @ 5620.1MHz - 5620.1 MHz Memory Frequency
GtiJason replied to safedisk's topic in Result Discussions
This has been fun to watch ! -
This is exactly what's been happening moving forward. The only benchmarks that allow LOD are older with the newest being Firestrike. Why would HWBot want to remove all LOD related scores when that was a legit way of tweaking back in the day. We all know what it does and why the score increases the way it does. No one is bugging their runs when using this tweak, it is consistent unlike running GDDR mems far above whats stable and where artifacting begins. There is nothing consistent about trying to break a test to have it shoot out a high score, that's what Any % Speedrunning is for. Competitive 3d benching was built tweaks like this and it is not right to up and remove ten's of thousands of runs people spent endless amounts of hours testing to find a setting that works best for that very specific hardware and test
-
A happy New Year, may the lords of OC be with you in 2023!
GtiJason replied to shar00750's topic in HWBOT News
Happy New Years OC Fam ! -
elmor - Core i9 13900K (8P) @ 9008.8MHz - 9008.82 MHz CPU Frequency
GtiJason replied to ground's topic in Result Discussions
Mind Officially Blown ! -
elmor - Core i9 13900K @ 8812.8MHz - 8812.85 MHz CPU Frequency
GtiJason replied to Lucky_n00b's topic in Result Discussions
Simply amazing ! -
Nice job, I ran this card for Cheapazz Chips in 2015 and maxxed out the freq with my SS mounted to the stock heatsink in place of the 40mm fan. Newer Cuda or GPUPi looks to be a bit more efficient, you could probably beat my 2nd place score at 1750ish core I was locked to 1946mhz for this test, but never got to re-run 1b after editing the bios to have a higher default clock. Good Luck !
-
I have the 32 Gb 4400c17-18 kit as well as the older 4000c16-19 kit and they both have no problem running 4000c14 daily stable at under 1.550v. Even 4133c14 is fully stable at 1.580 - 1.590v. I have never tried minimizing voltages because I don't daily these and typically run them at 1.750 or more Here are some timings for reference, just keep in mind this is for benching so supporting voltages are probably on the high side and freq at 4356 Mhz with 1.650v The 4000c16 kit is priced right but if price to performance ratios mean nothing to you the 4400c17 kit *should be slightly better bin