GtiJason

The 7th digit written on Elpida's IC's is always a letter and is important in determining what ic it actually is. You write that yours is an 8 so 99% certain it's actually this "B" BBSE ic's on kits 2133c9 and lower have all behaved very similar for me. Best case scenario is getting 2600c8 stable on best platforms (Z97) and 2400+ on older platforms. Good BBSE such as 2133c8-9-8-24 1.65v (F3-17000CL8D-4GBXMD) or 2200c9-9-9-27 (F3-17600CL9D-4GBXMD) may get up to around 2666c8-11-7 1.900v or so. Here are similar kits of mine that should give you an idea of what yours are capable of on new mobo or at least newer platforms. I don't recommend pushing over 1.920v ish dram v on air with any Elpida or Powerchip IC but these kits aren't great so I've pushed higher just to see if they still scale with high volts

From Millers GTG ?

Beautiful work Bartx

I believe this is what you said to me about my results and it looks to be a valid observation but then what do we say would be causing this in my results since I've been recording the runs to show I'm not messing with them. I've made video's so far for gtx 970/980 and soon 980ti, should I zoom out to show there is no tampering going on. I'm willing to do whatever it takes to prove I'm not messing with anything even borderline sneaky and do believe I can recreate the same eff on demand if needed so lmk. Glad to help

500 point front page Domination !

Nice, I'll take 2 please

Nice run

Dang son !!! killing it right now

missing a decimal point 7.67 is the real score, i wish it were 767, i'd be buying the best bang for the buck cpu asap

"From binning a while back, I have 3 chips which valid here @1.7V." Board limited to 657 fsb ?

I'm hopeful that this will get resolved to Marc's satisfaction fairly soon. I don't think NCspecV81 / Poon_flavored_Tang wants to be known as a scammer and believe this is similar to my situation with "Roy" and my SS. Hope it doesn't have to go to the court system level but have the info needed if so and have no problem flying out to east coast to represent Marc. Still, we do have a problem in our community. I've experienced it and at least half of the OC'ers I talk to daily have as well. I believe it's important for us to share this information openly not only to help friends recover losses but to warn others of potential scammers, weed out the bad seeds and allow both parties to state there case while those not involved can act as moderators. That being said, this is not the only problem our friend Marc is challenged with and has considered disappearing from our scene with great cause. I know this summer he has lost up to 3x as much as this instance from OP and a lot of that is from a well know previous scammer who decided not to show his face at the 2016 Worlds in Berlin. Yes Hazzan is STILL scamming people and owes Marc $1000 usd, if anyone still talks to him let him know that another thread about his shady antics has begun.

Very Nice !!!

so beautiful ! and RT it's found on Zip drive lol

Have not had enough time with it, but it seems a decent amount better than the Elite kits Corsair sent out a while back. Other FB pic shows them at 4133c12-12 passed CBR15 (easy enough on mems) at 1.860v bios. but 4000c12-12 49/50/6/6 32m waza needed 1.875v. VCC VTT seems fine 0.880-0.970 so that's good. I need more time to test out different combinations of vccio, sa, pchpll and vdimm

Like a Boss !

Lookin' good

I bet the 980ti gold was found on usb 2.0

@websmile 's reviews are usually good for helping with daily settings G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 C14-14-14-34 1,35v Review -

I just did a full install of Win 10 64bit, I believe it is the "Creator Update" iso on Z170 OC Formula and am getting Catzilla errors too. Even when installing through Steam (where I bought Advanced 4k code). I wonder whats happening ?

Whoa that's major

I know this my friend, just saw an opportunity and ran with it

Ah, apprentice sounds like it belongs below enthusiast. I like this Elite: access to industry support Extreme: hobbyist extreme overclocker Specialist: specialized cooling such as phase, tec or chiller Enthusiast: ambient cooling, registered >1y Novice: ambient cooling, registered >3m Rookie: ambient cooling, registered <3m

Went for a peek of this rule and noticed in 3.1 B Offences and Penalties "Score edit User ban User edits or adds ad hoc the mandatory information in a benchmark verification screenshot (update: Jan 17, 2013)" Not sure what "ad hoc" is supposed to mean ? Also in 1.1 – LEAGUE PARTICIPATION RULES, I see no Apprentice is this no longer a thing ? Elite: access to industry support Extreme: hobbyist extreme overclocker Enthusiast: ambient cooling, registered >1y Novice: ambient cooling, registered >3m Rookie: ambient cooling, registered <3m

I sent messages to C.Ney and Websmile immediately after subbing Explaining how the eff was accomplished Theres only so much you can do when following rules, plus HeavenX has a checksum with required datafile And screenie of all my runs in order to show how it scaled properly from one run to next with times/date shown and there were no anomalies like a really high or low score Not like i did anything special, we all know the tweaks. Find a good driver and test after each bios tweak to see if it helped or hurt Same w lod, priority, affinity (2core better or 3, whatabout ht etc) Services blah blah blah These seem to play a big role, many factory oc cards seem to lower XBAR, L2C and SYS as a tradeoff to high GPC or gpu core. Not a good idea