IllusioN Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Mate...I couldn't care less what you do, we are living in a free world, you can bench LN2, cascade or whatever pleases you. What I do not like is hypocrisy and bragging about benching a cascade, like that does not cost money or does not give you low temps. It makes me laugh my ass off when I see a "poor" western European complaining about money...If the best you can do in a country like Germany to earn money is fix old computers...you have a problem my friend, bigger then the existence of sponsored guys in the overclocking scene Germany??? .., Monstru my dear.., lets stop this now.., let me take pride in what I do.., even if i´m just fixing old computers to get me round the corner..., must laugh :-))) Obviously "workout" didnt help.. :-)))) I hope we meet some day and can laugh bout this..! This will be my last post here... Take care all benching dudes and dudettes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 (edited) Sweden...like that makes a difference to me....Sweden is a country with a very low standard of living and poor people...especially compared to rich Romania where dogs have quad-cores on their backs and money grow on trees, no?...I suppose some fellows living in civilised countries have no clue what Eastern Europe is about... As I was saying, your problem lies somewhere else, and this is not the place to search for a solution.... Edited August 28, 2008 by Monstru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predator Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 especially compared to rich Romania where dogs have quad-cores on their backs and money grow on trees damn, you didn't tell me about this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 Agree with Monstru on majority of his two previous postings, but i think we're really off-topic now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t0mz0r Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Agree with Monstru on majority of his two previous postings, but i think we're really off-topic now Ditto :ws: I think we will be getting such hardware sharing reports for on and on until hardware and software developers don't find a way to ID a cards' S/N in a screenshot. Just gonna go out on a limb here; are S/N's really the only way to distinguish cards from each other? Does anyone here know W1zzard? (afaik he made GPU-Z happen) http://forums.techpowerup.com/member.php?u=1 /t0m :celebration: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Well, I guess we'll finish with the off topic then Predator...man..if I would tell you about this everyone would like to move here, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 A possible solution for this issue would be to only count points towards the team total for the best result of each hardware configuration (for each benchmark). eg. person a of team a has a Q6600 running at 4.2Ghz in CPU-Z worth 10 hwboints person b of team a also has a Q6600, running at 4.1Ghz in CPU-Z worth 8 hwboints Both results would be added to their personal total, but only the result of person a would count towards the team total. This algorithm would have several benefits: + hw sharing between team mates is discouraged, and does not have to be monitored by mods + it pushes teams to differentiate in their hardware setup But also drawbacks: - large teams with members running mostly the same kind of popular hardware (eg E8500 + HD4870), would see a significant drop in hwboints - it discourages people who are not top overclockers and have very common hardware to join their team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Both results would be added to their personal total, but only the result of person a would count towards the team total. This sound pretty fine by me, that would put an end to HW sharing discussion. Problem is that teams with more TOP o/c-ers will have a big disadvantage.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 P.S.: Good to see NoName back. P.S.S.: This wont work, Richbastard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Fred, may be let's have a public vote, shall we? or, let's make two team rankings - all points score - best scores per hardware score that way we can see who's the biggest and who's the most diverse team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 Good idea, make a poll....The only problem is that very few will vote, like it was with the Vantage Poll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 I think it's too early for a poll. The idea rich cam up with is decent, but the first "revision" has too big drawbacks:) Perhaps it needs to be "tweaked" a little bit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dualist Posted August 29, 2008 Share Posted August 29, 2008 (edited) Deleted crap. EDIT, just re-read your post RB (it's late) sounds good, personal scores are up'ed, team takes the best, starting to like this as a team effort, big teams wouldn't win but individuals do Edited August 29, 2008 by Dualist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t0mz0r Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 P.S.: Good to see NoName back QFT + yay! :nana: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew stummerwinter Posted September 25, 2008 Crew Share Posted September 25, 2008 To avoid all discussion from my todays scores, here my hardware: More details in our forum: http://awardfabrik.de/forum/showthread.php?p=203573#post203573 Today was short programme, tomorrow (hopefully) freestyle... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BendgerWilson Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 These two results have almost the same CPU(Freq+Vcore),GPUs and memory clocks. Is this sharing allowed? Result #1. Sergey13: 119633 GPUs: 2x4870@859/1140 with 800/1100 default CPU: E8600@6252Mhz 1.952Vcore http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810497 Result #2. MayK: 120295 GPUs: 2x4870@855/1150 with 800/1100 default CPU: E8600@6268MHz 1.952VCore http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809724 The same situation with AM3 scores: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809733 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810493 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergey13 Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 BendgerWilson I don't know who you are, but you can see pics of hardware here http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1547 . We have more then one E8600 that can do 6300+ but this results were MB limited. Also this freqs of video are usual for stock. And for me it's not so strange that 4870 from one shop and bought in one day have almost same freqs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Hi Sergey, Can you explain why the formatting of the screen shots is nearly identical as well? I can understand hardware performing similarly, but it is highly unlikely two different users will format their screen shots the same way. Thanks, maxi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergey13 Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 Maxi From your PM I understood your point of view and next time we'll try to make much more difference in our screenshots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 The screenshot layout has made some other peoples results look suspicious too Sharing or not, theres only so many ways we can lay out all the info required on a screen thats clear to take the info from Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.