varachio Posted August 16, 2012 Posted August 16, 2012 Take out the 'WWW.' and it'll work fine. Thanks for the info... I was trying since yesterday to submit to x2 & x4 section without luck... now working also for me... Quote
Mr.Scott Posted August 16, 2012 Posted August 16, 2012 Thanks for the info... I was trying since yesterday to submit to x2 & x4 section without luck... now working also for me... You're most welcome. Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted August 26, 2012 Posted August 26, 2012 are we allowed to run a unlocked dual core ( that unlocks into a quad core ) as a tri core ? i noticed one of the teams doing it Quote
saint19 Posted August 26, 2012 Posted August 26, 2012 are we allowed to run a unlocked dual core ( that unlocks into a quad core ) as a tri core ? i noticed one of the teams doing it Yeah, its possible always that unlock as a tri core and enough stable for the run. Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 are we allowed to run a unlocked dual core ( that unlocks into a quad core ) as a tri core ? i noticed one of the teams doing it Can always unlock and compete in a higher weight class - can't disable cores and compete in a lower weight class. Refer to pcm05 rankings for tri core. Also for 5 core. Lots of unlocked results there. Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 cool imog what about unlocking 555 BE into a 4x cpu and using it to submit as a 3x cpu ?? ppl in your team are doing so Quote
knopflerbruce Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 That's not OK. Post some links here and I'll edit them, or you can report them if you prefer. Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 nah there are so many guys using 4x unlocked cpus and removing a a core a doubt it will be fair now to report them Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 nah there are so many guys using 4x unlocked cpus and removing a a core a doubt it will be fair now to report them Report it, I haven't seen that, but that's what I do when I see people making mistakes with submissions on my own team. There are only a handful of people with incorrect tri core submissions... It was a few months ago when I was doing pcm05 tricore globals, and i reported a lot of erroneous submissions from people who didn't know better. otherwise if you are too lazy to provide proof, dont make accusations. Really, you didn't know the rules until I explained them to you... I doubt you are correct in what you are saying. For instance, a 555be that unlocks to 4 cores can legally be submitted as 2x, 3x, and 4x. If there is a problem, let's see it. Quote
Slaughter Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 nah there are so many guys using 4x unlocked cpus and removing a a core a doubt it will be fair now to report them I'm not seeing it either? Unless you are referring to the AMD Phenom II X4 B55 submissions? When the X2 555 is unlocked, it becomes the X4 B55. But as I.M.O.G. stated, unless you are going to come up with the proof, don't make the accusations. Quote
knopflerbruce Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 nah there are so many guys using 4x unlocked cpus and removing a a core a doubt it will be fair now to report them There are several ways to unlock a CPU to 3x. I think some ASUS boards can do that directly if the 4th core isn't stable at all, but usually you have to unlock to 4x and then disable one core in BIOS. Both ways are definately legal. Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted August 27, 2012 Posted August 27, 2012 sorry i didnt mean to offend any1 Quote
Gluvocio Posted August 28, 2012 Posted August 28, 2012 Gluvo Tweak 2.2 is there, but I have problems to submit Quote
Teemto Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 So what do the experts think about the VAPOR scores ? His Virusscan is insane, Gen HDD usage pretty high too. And that all accomplished with just 2 SSD's in RAID and no other soft ? Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) So what do the experts think about the VAPOR scores ? His Virusscan is insane, Gen HDD usage pretty high too. And that all accomplished with just 2 SSD's in RAID and no other soft ? Bugged, if not ramdrive. Only areca ramcache or hardware ramdrive do gen usage like that. Virus scan is high, but certain drive setups and firmware yield extra high virus scan. Dunno about that high. Gen usage is the one hard to fake. Virus scan can get crazy. I've done gen usage like that, but with $2500 worth of storage. Edited August 31, 2012 by I.M.O.G. Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted August 31, 2012 Crew Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) Yes D3mox FYI Santa Claus and the pope are the same guy Dunno if it's hard to replicate then results with just 2 SSD's. Edited August 31, 2012 by Leeghoofd Quote
Christian Ney Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Will block them all when I reach a pc! Party time (not for him) Quote
Moose83 Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Thanks Christian. I also bencht before onboard, Virus scan 2g is possible, but 3g on single core and 5g on multicore isnt possible. So i think this is cheating, and gen usage on onboard also cant so high. I hope, that there are consequences for him, we all want to reach top, but only with fairplay:) Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) Thanks Christian. I also bencht before onboard, Virus scan 2g is possible, but 3g on single core and 5g on multicore isnt possible.So i think this is cheating, and gen usage on onboard also cant so high. I hope, that there are consequences for him, we all want to reach top, but only with fairplay:) It's not that different than the crazy audio/video encoding scores and no one has complained about those yet (rules say no replacing codecs - are they replacig codecs?). A 6.1 ivy does 10k in each with basic codec setting tweaks. I hope no one gets in trouble for pcmark submissions. It is so hard to tell what is legal and what isn't. The whole "no tricking the benchmark to make it believe it ran faster" rule also doesnt apply to pcm05 - memory latency scores when tweaked disrupt the measurement. Edited August 31, 2012 by I.M.O.G. Quote
Moose83 Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Gluvo plays hard, but always fair. His Audio tweak is settings i gues Dennis is an top tweaker. I have 990FX here, and nearly same Hardware. I will test today the 12.8 RAID with ssd onboard if this can be true:) Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) You'll want to test different cluster sizes when formatting the drives, and for the RAID stripe sector size. I've seen a teammate do extra large scores in virus scan that way, same as the submisions in question... That was some time ago, my teammate didn't submit them because he didn't want to bother with the questions/criticism because it looks bugged. Changing cluster sizes shouldn't have that sort of effect, but when using it with the amd storage manager for some reason it can do that. Edited August 31, 2012 by I.M.O.G. Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted August 31, 2012 Posted August 31, 2012 Here's a screenshot, big gen usage and 9K virus scan by modifying those kinds of formatting settings on amd platform (3x crucial m4 raid0): [ATTACH]1337[/ATTACH] Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted August 31, 2012 Crew Posted August 31, 2012 So it can be done on two SSD's without any 3rd party non legit software... cool... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.