Jump to content

Featured Replies

They have no respect for themselves and for all honest overclockers.

 

HWbot is on huge wrong direction, nothing is done.

 

When russians get ban there was one set of rules, when hkepc member get one month ban there are other rules, they changed. That is shit.

Edited by poparamiro

  • Replies 77
  • Views 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

*sigh*

 

im fairly certain hwbot staff does not get paid enough for this bs.

 

Still waiting for the money on the bank account, there are several people at the staff we need to split the money you know, it takes time. And Massman wants 50 % for himself dat b*

why im not playing lottery...

another PRO oc'er from nowhere, Again HKPEC, again cheating. isn't it booring for you guys ? ( from the team itself )

  • Crew

Hahaha that's so funny, I've bitten my tongue long enough

 

I guess when John Lam said on Facebook he's teaching Edison to tweak 01 he wasn't joking, oh it was probably ms ram drive that no overclocker can compile right, I did compile it and ran pifast 100 times and never saw any desktop screenshots half cut off

 

you couldn't tweak a nipple, no one believes that shit

Edited by pro

349 point discrepancy you say fester?

376 point advantage over Team.AU?

 

Seems here the HKEPC guys forgot to do math this time...because surely ~15-25 points over Team.AU without cheating was enough for them, or they were afraid of backups?

28087401.jpg

Edited by battlecryawesome

 

Searching Compression Signatures: (3347 built-in, 0 user(*) )

 

EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match?

------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- --------------

CAM:[sONY ] [CYBERSHOT U ] [ ] Yes

SW :[Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ] [save As 07 ]

SW :[Apple Quicktime ] [0466-0467 ]

SW :[Digital Photo Professiona] [05 ]

SW :[iJG Library ] [075 ]

SW :[MS Paint ] [ ]

SW :[MS Visio ] [ ]

SW :[ZoomBrowser EX ] [low ]

 

The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:

SW :[GIMP ] [075 ]

SW :[irfanView ] [075 ]

SW :[idImager ] [075 ]

SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [075 ]

SW :[NeatImage ] [075 ]

SW :[Paint.NET ] [075 ]

SW :[Photomatix ] [075 ]

SW :[XnView ] [075 ]

 

just for reference.... against one of MY OWN submissions.

 

fyi only paint was used to paste in and create the image... you know the regular print screen open paint paste save

 

Searching Compression Signatures: (3347 built-in, 0 user(*) )

 

EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match?

------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- --------------

CAM:[PENTAX ] [PENTAX Optio 550 ] [ ] No

SW :[Apple ImageIO.framework ] [049 ]

SW :[iJG Library ] [079 ]

 

The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:

SW :[GIMP ] [079 ]

SW :[irfanView ] [079 ]

SW :[idImager ] [079 ]

SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [079 ]

SW :[NeatImage ] [079 ]

SW :[Paint.NET ] [079 ]

SW :[Photomatix ] [079 ]

SW :[XnView ] [079 ]

 

 

 

 

now lets compare the screen shot from edison.chan vs the one Dino pointed out...

 

EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match?

------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- --------------

CAM:[sONY ] [CYBERSHOT U ] [ ] Yes

SW :[Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ] [save As 07 ]

SW :[Apple Quicktime ] [0466-0467 ]

SW :[Digital Photo Professiona] [05 ]

SW :[iJG Library ] [075 ]

SW :[MS Paint ] [ ]

SW :[MS Visio ] [ ]

SW :[ZoomBrowser EX ] [low ]

 

The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:

SW :[GIMP ] [075 ]

SW :[irfanView ] [075 ]

SW :[idImager ] [075 ]

SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [075 ]

SW :[NeatImage ] [075 ]

SW :[Paint.NET ] [075 ]

SW :[Photomatix ] [075 ]

SW :[XnView ] [075 ]

 

 

Searching Compression Signatures: (3347 built-in, 0 user(*) )

 

EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match?

------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- --------------

CAM:[sONY ] [CYBERSHOT U ] [ ] Yes

SW :[Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ] [save As 07 ]

SW :[Apple Quicktime ] [0466-0467 ]

SW :[Digital Photo Professiona] [05 ]

SW :[iJG Library ] [075 ]

SW :[MS Paint ] [ ]

SW :[MS Visio ] [ ]

SW :[ZoomBrowser EX ] [low ]

 

The following IJG-based editors also match this signature:

SW :[GIMP ] [075 ]

SW :[irfanView ] [075 ]

SW :[idImager ] [075 ]

SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [075 ]

SW :[NeatImage ] [075 ]

SW :[Paint.NET ] [075 ]

SW :[Photomatix ] [075 ]

SW :[XnView ] [075 ]

 

Based on the analysis of compression characteristics and EXIF metadata:

 

ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed/edited

 

 

amazingly, it seems to come from the same system!

Edited by zeneffect

Think hwbot must offer some snacks and drinks and a lot of popcorn thought.

This is better than an crime on TV, lol...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...