April 21, 201312 yr I'm gonna be a dick and complain about a feature! When I click "open CPU-Z...." I get 4 instances and then, when I either open OR MAXIMISE GPU-Z, I get a 5th instance of CPU-Z....whilst pushing GPU-Z 80% off-screen (right hand side) We need two CPU-Z instances for verification..... please can that be the number that are opened? Also, if we click "run again" .....can there be a script to automatically close CPU-Z and GPU-Z? (ok...this is probably not needed once the instance count is sorted, we can close three windows ) Thanks Edited April 21, 201312 yr by K404
April 21, 201312 yr I'm gonna be a dick and complain about a feature! When I click "open CPU-Z...." I get 4 instances and then, when I either open OR MAXIMISE GPU-Z, I get a 5th instance of CPU-Z....whilst pushing GPU-Z 80% off-screen (right hand side) We need two CPU-Z instances for verification..... please can that be the number that are opened? Also, if we click "run again" .....can there be a script to automatically close CPU-Z and GPU-Z? (ok...this is probably not needed once the instance count is sorted, we can close three windows ) Thanks Actually that's exactly how it's 'supposed' to work, but it's buggy with skinned cpuz/gpuz. Don't use the skinned versions and all would be good
April 22, 201312 yr I'm gonna be a dick and complain about a feature! When I click "open CPU-Z...." I get 4 instances and then, when I either open OR MAXIMISE GPU-Z, I get a 5th instance of CPU-Z....whilst pushing GPU-Z 80% off-screen (right hand side) We need two CPU-Z instances for verification..... please can that be the number that are opened? Also, if we click "run again" .....can there be a script to automatically close CPU-Z and GPU-Z? (ok...this is probably not needed once the instance count is sorted, we can close three windows ) Thanks I have the same problem , and i also dont use a skinned version.
May 12, 201312 yr Hi GENiEBEN, First want to say Thank you for all the work you have been n still are putting into the app. Some help with an issue please. I am not an avid 3D bencher but I know there is something wrong here. This first run was with Aqua3 with wrapper version 1 This second run was done with I think is the latest version 2.25 As you notice the dramatic difference in scores. All HW n settings remained the same for both runs. Is there something that I must do with the newer version? Thank you...
May 18, 201312 yr Crew Try to run on all cores. AM3 shows huge bumps in performance running with at least 2 cores. Im missing some kind of checkbox window, where I can select on which cores I want to run the bench.
May 31, 201312 yr It seems like the file is always written in the character set of the OS, but the wrapper says it is utf8. You are right, just looked over the code. If I ignore the charset in xml altogether would your parser handle the file?
May 31, 201312 yr Crew Im missing some kind of checkbox window, where I can select on which cores I want to run the bench. Back in the days without any wrapper we used prioaff.exe tool to manually assign on which cores AQ3 should run. Genie, would that be hard to implement? There are some OS's outthere where you need to run the bench on atleast 2 cores before full performance is achieved.
July 1, 201311 yr Get a 0 score using the wrapper with a Matrox G550 & Parhelia 256, (XP-32) both have no problem using the exe.
July 1, 201311 yr Get a 0 score using the wrapper with a Matrox G550 & Parhelia 256, (XP-32) both have no problem using the exe. Yeah there seems to be a problem with most IGP, but it is now fixed in 2.26 (to be launched soon).
July 21, 201311 yr I can hear only crickets in here. Whats up with the support lately ? I have sent emails to Genieben a while ago and also ask questions about this bugged high scores and everyone just keep quiet ????? I need an answer please help on this matter. Genieben you got PM. Thank you in advanced. Regards: Chispy
July 22, 201311 yr Author I don't see a reason why Genieben's wrapper would give bugged scores. Mostly, when users report a bugged scores it's a matter of finding a couple settings that is making the result lower than expected.
July 22, 201311 yr I can hear only crickets in here. Whats up with the support lately ? I have sent emails to Genieben a while ago and also ask questions about this bugged high scores and everyone just keep quiet ????? I need an answer please help on this matter. Genieben you got PM. Thank you in advanced. Regards: Chispy AFK in vacation, seen your PM
September 7, 201311 yr I have an Aquamark 2.26 score to upload. Checking Wrapper File is ok, but when i submit finally, i get an error
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.