UCBench11: Tweaks and Luck

[Moose83]

Only allow default settings and done

[Calathea]

Thanks for the effort Christian. I really liked the bench, so a revival in the future would be greatly appreciated.

[sburnolo]

Hi,

I have deleted almost all score bugged but now no longer appears ucbench in my submission.

Correct all you?

Thanks.

[Bogd4n]

Read post #166.

[sburnolo]

I read the post,but I thought it might help to clear my score.

Please read the post # 173.

That is not possible now.

Good job to all the staff!

[[GF]Duke]

Will all the scores that are getting deleted be returned to us? It seems like all my scores are getting flagged.

Here are 2 for example. I see no bugged run.

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2499878_gfduke_ucbench_2011_core_i7_4930k_2217_mpt_score

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2552628_gfduke_ucbench_2011_core_2_e8400_(3.0ghz)_672.8_mpt_score

[CL3P20]

Only allow default settings and done

 

For 5960X - I only had CPU for testing.. but using default t-count cause bug runs too, which is why I start using other t-counts. I typically dont get into the habit of saving bug results... but for the sake of this thread, guess I had better start

 

*24 was causing a lot of bug results as well, getting 4/5 runs with bug (using Win7 too to eliminate ACPI issue with octo core in XP)

 

8c/16t = 1t bug, 3t bug ... so how can default settings be used?

[Moose83]

Dissallow 5960x lol

[ObscureParadox]

and every single 1,3,5 and 8 core

[Splave]

who wants to so 3k 8 core

[Christian Ney]

We just made a sheet

 

[[GF]Duke]

It's a good thing I still have all my UCBench cpus. When this is over i'll just have to show that my subs are legit. A tweaked os putting up good scores doesn't make my subs bugged.

[ObscureParadox]

Duke;332842']It's a good thing I still have all my UCBench cpus. When this is over i'll just have to show that my subs are legit. A tweaked os putting up good scores doesn't make my subs bugged.

 

I don't know what your subs look like but this bench is so messed up that it's pretty likely that your subs actually are bugged.

 

Don't take it too personally because even those who run at stock speeds have had bugged results' date=' trust me it happens

 

We just made a sheet

 

 

 

Looking at this are you literally just checking those which are highest globals?

 

If you are then you're going to miss quite a few results that are going to be bugged. If I had any sort of control I'd be more than happy to help out now that I have no job and a lot of time on my hands

[GENiEBEN]

If you are then you're going to miss quite a few results that are going to be bugged. If I had any sort of control I'd be more than happy to help out now that I have no job and a lot of time on my hands

 

[Splave]

wait so can you run just 60 and 64 or not as long as command line is not touched only using what the benchmark sets right?

[GENiEBEN]

wait so can you run just 60 and 64 or not as long as command line is not touched only using what the benchmark sets right?

 

Unless you have 64 threads (4P mobo), then no.

[Splave]

Im so lost right now lol so what are the clear cut rules?

[Christian Ney]

Coming soon

[[GF]Duke]

Im so lost right now lol so what are the clear cut rules?

[Christian Ney]

27.6 % of all UCBench scores have been checked.

 

ETA: 45-60 days.

[xsuperbgx]

That is too much work when there is so many other things that could be done with your valuable time. I am shocked that you would not just scrap all results or change to no points.

 

Thanks to the guys that are hard at work.

[Mr.Scott]

 

Thanks to the guys that are hard at work.

 

Ditto

[errhon]

hi, UcBench 2011 is off?

i can't submit my cpu result

[GENiEBEN]

hi, UcBench 2011 is off?

i can't submit my cpu result

 

For now, yes, but it will be back somewhere in November.

[knopflerbruce]

For now, yes, but it will be back somewhere in November.

 

So no point (pun intended:D) in running the old version, then?