Submission & member moderation

I'm benching a processor which my mobo recognises, CPU-Z 1.49 recognises correctly, but CPU-Z 1.51 thinks is a different model (which HWBot doesn't have, but the model exists according to Wiki). Do I submit the CPU-Z 1.51 verification to the correct model I know it is, and put CPU-Z 1.49 in all my benchmarks, or wait until the latest CPU-Z recognises it correctly? Going to email CPU-Z about the issue in due course. borandi

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=814019 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=490430'>http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=490430 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=814531 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=490430

Please mods verify and check this score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=846930, compare that score with mine run at much much higher clocks on LN2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837110 , i suspect a 3DMark03 Bug done in purpose to give a higher score NOT online with everyone else score , something its not right. On his run he used dual channel , i did tried with dual channel and the scores were lower than the ones i posted for ranking , hence why i did run tri-channel and that was my best score even testing dual and tri-channel. That score cannot be done and not possible on those low clocks. Please identify the problem , bug or cheat.As we all know 03 its…

Can the 7800GT have an extra class added for the 512MB cards? The RAM is significantly better on them so gets an advantage over the 256MB cards. Plenty other cards with extra categories for different RAM volumes where the difference is smaller. Yes, I have a vested interest in this one as Im ranked with the 7800GT (256) and am being beaten by some 512MB scores Cheers, K

How can i check that its a 256bit or 512bit version? Just look at this result, he has hided the Bus Width at the screen. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=822426 So how can i check the bus width in a futuremark compare link?

Somebody take a look on this entry: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632079. The entered time says 37 sec. but the screenshot says 37.64 sec. I'm second placed at the moment with a better time score.

hi my friends , As I know when a rule made every submission has to obey them , yes ? I don't want to say their results are fake or ... because their true but as i know ANY 3DMark06 Top 5 Submission needs ORB Link and in GTX 260 216 i see many peoples don't have this Link and their results are here ! Maybe in any other sections you could see this and they don't have ORB link but they submission not rejeceted .

Could someone please clean up that disgusting mess in single card 2001 "wr". its sickening http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=847327 under 18

Hey, it looks like duplicate results have been reported for the same member for Super Pi times in the AMD Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton) and AMD Athlon MP 2000+ (Palomino) threads. Both 46 second scores for the Super Pi 1M benchmark times show the same forum post link screenshot. Both screen shots identify the processor as a "Thorton" , not as a "Palomino". The entry in the AMD Athlon MP 2000+ Palomino thread is not for a Palomino processor. It should be deleted. It is a duplicate entry from another category. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1127 That double entry has been reported multiple times, but no action has been taken. Would so…

I am married (Fabi) and my wife also practices overclock , but does not have an account on HWBot. Fabi is the only female overclocker in Brazil. She would like to participate and able to put the results on HWBot. I would like to know if there are some problem if she create an account and post her results on HWbot. We'd like to post the results separately (each with the result itself), but it will if there is no problem with the HWBot. I am asking cause sometimes we validated the results together, but me and Fabi works. Sorry the broken english, i hope you understand me. Thanks for the help

why did i lose scores on my 2x-285 when i put in my 3x-285s?

I tryed to validate CPUz many and many times, and i did run superpi, pifast and another benchmarks but its impossible to validate the CPUz with the new Phenom II 955. i will show below 5418 Mhz 5920 Mhz AMD Overdrive Superpi 1MB PiFast 6221 Mhz I think i did a good result....can you help me to validate?

Hi Guys, in the next months (but I don't know exactly when) I might be able to run Wprime on a cluster based on several computers. This cluster is now running on Linux, but I think (but not 100% sure) I (or another guy from my work) will be able to install a windows emulator like Wine on it. What kind of validation can I propose in order to get the results accepted because I'm not sure the validation tool will work on this cluster. CPU-Z windows won't show the cluster processors, since I access this cluster through another computer, so CPU-Z will only show info about the computer I'm physically working on (it can be a Pentium s478). I'm a running jobs on…

Hello, I'm pretty new to HWbot and I've just started submitting scores. I've got my bench setup connected to the internet and I'm running the CPUZ Validator from there but every score I get shows the same its been rejected by CPUZ, anyone have any idea why its doing this ? http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=553044 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=553008

Hey guys, I have noticed various scores that have been reported and not checked. Some of these scores are months old. I know the mods have a great deal to do, just wondering if/when they will be sorted. Cheers, Rich.

The 6th and 7th place is same user in different teams, description is same in both results and describes 7600gt in the 7300gt catogory. The one link to a screenshot also shows 7600gt's. Results> http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=12&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7300+GT+DDR3+(731)&numberOfVideocards=2&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1191&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&am…

The following entries look to be the same entry/screenshot posted in two different categories. This one is listed as being for a CPU-Z entry and has no validation that I can find and is based on a 1M Super PI run. The verification description given is the screenshot in question itself: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642362 This one is an entry for Super PI: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642364

Hey guys. It's my first time in the bot community and sadly I made a huge mistake. I tried to upload a result in Super Pi 1m and I accidentally forgot to write the time that I did that. Then the result was submited with 0s and it's top in rank! I deleted the entry and uploaded the true score but the result is still there! Can someone please help me? Delete the result or something? I'm totally paniced and ashamed that I made such a mistake...... :(:(:(

I'm asking after having read the rules and finding nothing which would illegalize a score like the attached one. It was achieved with a driver that caused nvidia to be accused of cheating and has, compared to other scores, a quite apparent diverging distribution of Fps in the individual game tests. No the question: Is this score valid so that i can go for an entry?

Hi there, I'm hoping this issue can be resolved smoothly. I recently requested the following cpu (Opteron 1224 SE) to be added and that is all fine and dandy, I've even submitted a pifast and super-pi result with it and all is well. I recently tried to submit wprime 32 result, however, and all is not well. I used v1.55 and have input all data as I did for the other two results I posted, yet the cpu shows as an unknown processor. Link. Any ideas?

Hi. While looking over some scores I found these two results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807402 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807432 I reported the entry but nothing happened. Is Wprime 2.00 accepted now? Thanks

We all know they are the same card and nV just reflashed the name ID. If we did the same, can we submit results for both categories from one card? My gut feeling is"no" but because its an nV oddity...... may as well ask.

Hey its me again Today 5 Scores of me were flagged and 1 blocked. The blocked 3DMark01 score is okay, i know whats wrong, no discussion. I'll try to rerun it with valid screenshot. But the others flagged scores confuse me. First there 4 times "GPU-Z missing", but Rivatuner is shown - GPU-Z works not for me. If my graphiccard is @stock gpu-z works, but if i overclock it and start the GPU-Z, or overclock while running GPU-Z my PC freezes, dunno why but it does. So i cant use GPU-Z. Further there are doubts with using the AGP Slots on my Mainboard - on other Scores u can see that AGP is enabled. I forget it on 3DMark06 but anyway i hope now its a valid screenshot. Aq…

Phisycs X cheat used on this submission , please check this score done on a c2d dual core and GTX 285 on air. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838527 Compared that with mine on LN2 GTX 285 @ 900/1405Mhz and i7 965 on LN2, thank you mods. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837121

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671226 See helpcenter ticket #44 for more info about the Toledo/Denmark core issue. It's the 2nd time someone wanted to move this score, and the last time it was indeed moved. I don't feel like moving it back all the time to get my 12.6 points, so it would be great if it would be checked once and for all;)