I.nfraR.ed

I've been going through some of my CPUs. I forgot to note the reported core by BCRC for some of the first entries in the table, so take them with a grain of salt. The lookup table for those cores is not 100% correct anyway. Some of my Thoroughbreds are missing, hopefully I will find where they are Model OPN Batch Core CPUID Rev Unlocked Code Name Site.Major.Minor Multiplier type Possible Marker Athlon XP 1700+ AXDA1700DLT3C AIUGA 0245SPIW Thoroughbred-A 0680 A0 yes 2308 Thoroughbred 1.0.4 Unknown Unknown Athlon XP 1700+ AXDA1700DLT3C AIRGA 0319WPMW Thoroughbred-A 0680 A0 yes 2318 Thoroughbred 1.0.14 Locked MIAGA Athlon XP 1700+ AXDA1700DLT3C RIRGA 0233VPMW Thoroughbred-A 0680 A0 yes 2318 Thoroughbred 1.0.14 Locked MIAGA Athlon XP 1700+ AXDA1700DLT3C JIUHB 0320MPMW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 1700+ AXDA1700DLT3C JIUHB 0323RPMW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 1700+ AXDA1700DUT3C JIUHB 0312XPFW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 1700+ AXDA1700DUT3C JIUCB 0251TPXW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2326 Thoroughbred 1.1.6 Unknown Unknown Athlon XP 1800+ AXDA1800DLT3C JIUHB 0310MPMW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 1800+ AXDA1800DLT3C JIUHB 0333VPMW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 2000+ AXDC2000DUT3C AQZFA 0343UPMW Thorton 06A0 A2 no 2306 {empty} 1.0.2 Locked AQYFA Athlon XP 2000+ AXDC2000DUT3C AQXEA 0324UPMW Thorton 06A0 A2 yes 2316 Thorton 1.0.12 Unlocked Unknown Athlon XP 2000+ AXDA2000DUT3C KIXJB 0415EPMW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 no 2333 Thoroughbred 1.1.13 Undetermined JIXIB/AIXJB Athlon XP 2000+ AXDA2000DKV3C JIUHB 0338MPM Thoroughbred-A 0680 A0 yes 2308 Thoroughbred 1.0.4 Unknown Unknown Athlon XP 2100+ AXDA2100DUT3C AIUHB 0302WPDW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 2100+ AXDA2100DUT3C JIUHB 0308VPMW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 2200+ AXDA2200DUV3C AIUCB 0240RPFW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2326 Thoroughbred 1.1.6 Unknown Unknown Athlon XP 2400+ AXDC2400DKV3C AQXFA 0348MPMW Thorton 06A0 A2 no 2306 {empty} 1.0.2 Locked AQYFA Athlon XP 2400+ AXDA2400DKV3C AIXHB 0328SPGW Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2334 Thoroughbred 1.1.14 Unlocked AIUHB/JIUHB Athlon XP 2400+ AXDA2400DKV3C AIUGB 0244MPM Thoroughbred-B 0681 B0 yes 2322 1.1.2 Unknown Unknown Athlon XP 2500+ AXDA2500DKV4D AQYFA 0350SPGW Barton 06A0 A2 no 2315 Thorton w/512K 1.0.11 Locked AQYFA What I've seen so far: Reticle site is always 1 - it's either a mistake in the tweaker or these bits started to be meaningful from K8 and up Major mask revision is always the same as the stepping (read from CPUID) and the only core that has 1 instead of 0 is Thoroughbred B (as in "the 2nd revision of T-Bred core") Minor revision is the interesting one BCRC displays Barton if minor revision is 12 and Thorton w/512K when it is 11. Note that the CPU in red is FAKE Thoroughbred-B, in reality it's T-Bred A instead with L3, L5 and L12 bridges manipulated and has fake markings. Up to the "Unlocked" column are values either written on the cpu or detected from other tools. Unlocked column is based on testing. Rest of the columns are from BCRC and the tweaker. I will also check what Palomino reports, but that MSR is invalid on Thunderbird core, so maybe it's the same on Palominos. PS: Maybe we should use some shared google sheet, since you can't really format the tables here.

My boards are going down one by one without doing anything special, so I had to take the chance.

Yes, this seems to be common with ATI, not sure what the reason is. Even with a 3GHz CPU and VGA@999/1140 I could not get above 300 on CL and only hit about 110 in CH.

These "possible crystal marker" and "possible parent crystal" are just educated guesses based on other parameters. The multiplier type is also probably guessed based on some parameters (major.minor rev, but maybe something else too). That minor revision is kind of strange, I would have guessed higher minor revision would mean a newer cpu, but based on your table - that is not the case. I've added a message box to the tweaker on app open that displays the info I currently have implemented. There's not much info about the topic, but K8 KBDG (BIOS and Kernel Developer's Guide for AMD AthlonTM 64 and AMD OpteronTM Processors) has the MSR register in question documented There's one more value, which is "Reticle Site" and I've included it in the info. Curious to see what different cpus show. Btw, reading and writing MSRs is quite easy. You can use the MSR Editor and MSR Walker in CrystalCPUID tool. PS: I'm thinking of writing a small tool that automatically dumps CPUID registers, MSRs and all the info like cpuid, name, family, model, revision, etc. This way, the comparisons would be easier and faster. Edit: Replaced the app with new build. I was reading wrong part of the register, but it should be ok now. nForce2XT_Debug_20210703.zip

Awesome!

Yes, this has so much potential. I was fighting with the board for several hours and managed to complete just 2 runs :D Had a better one with better timings, but with a bugged troll's lair.

Yes, I've seen the same, but better structured changelogs, here: https://www.lejabeach.com/DFI/BIOS/dfiultrabbios.html I've compared them in the past, but not so extensively. There's a mention about "improved" 3D Mark 2001SE performance, but I don't know if the changes are in the romsip tables or somewhere else. Maybe it's worth checking performance of the bioses "as-is" on a real Ultra B first, with same manual settings on diffrerent benchmarks, but that's a lot of work. 2004/01/31 2. Increase 3DMark2001 SE performance (compare to 12/31) AFAIK that 15 10 doesn't work and it had been changed in most (all?) modbioses. Apparently Oskar Wu changed it too. I believe what you've shown on the right side should be close to optimal for all boards with all multipliers (the multiplier tables part). NF3 and NF4 bioses also use "E4", although I don't know how relevant it is.

Yes, even stock 7800GS+ scored 100fps at CL and CPU @ 2500. 107+ fps with CPU @ 2750. You can try 7.11 and 8.4/8.5 drivers with the 1950X. Nothing would come close to 3850's Nature performance though. I guess you use specific test order and setlod?

Yes, tried different bioses and different values in the tweaker. I may install your modbios with the predefined romsip tables to check, but so far nothing helps.I can boot 260, but no stability, 255 is on the edge and usually experience a sudden force close while running a test (mostly on the "high" ones). 253 was ok. AGP bus up to 105MHz and voltage up to 1.8V didn't make a difference. Kind of want to try a KT880 board to see if it will be the same. I have a Delta-FSR somewhere in the closet.

Thanks. It seems HD3850 isn't very suitable for socket A. It's either a driver issue or it's a severe bottleneck by the platform. VGA overclock doesn't do much, mostly noticeable in Nature and that's what saves the day compared to e.g. a lower-tier nvidia card. CPU overclock doesn't help much either, I have similar scores on air-cooled CPU. I don't know why the "low" tests are so bad, especially car. FSB clock is the way to go and although this board can run 1M at close to 270MHz, it's really unstable above 250MHz with 3850. I also had to use the integrated SATA, since the VGA blocks both IDE ports and can't install the IDE-SATA adaptor. I guess one of my issues might be the modern PSU I'm using, had huge issues with CPU overclock. It is tested for 2.9 on ambient (3050 1M on chiller), but I couldn't even POST at 2.9. Had to clock it in windows. Also higher voltage was making it worse. I may try with 7800GS+, it will probably do better in other tests, not sure how it would compete in Nature. Ah, one more note - latest gpuz from the official site BSODs with gpuz-v2.sys or something like that.

You need VC++ 2005 SP1 redistributable package in order to run the patch. It didn't help with hiccups in car test when the mech is shooting. I've tested many drivers and have no solution yet.

I'm lucky my HD3850 still works, although it appeared dead at first. Thanks for the patch.

I do. With a HD3850.

The popular believe is that it's basically a Win10 with a new shell and icons, so I wouldn't expect any difference in performance at this stage.

It should be similar to F7e, which has some (broken) support for Vishera and I think you want older bioses for K10 anyway.

Yes, however I have the same question about 3rd stage - are there no limits really or they were left out for some reason?

I know it's a language barrier, but don't know how to help you and what the problem is.

Good question. IMO, any customization needs to be controlled with the appropriate interface for that. I guess that feature will be back at some point, but not the free form css input. If a "theme" customization is needed, then some sort of a theme editor has to be implemented.

Haha, so I now know what he tried to do, either by mistake, or intentionally exploiting css injection vulnerabilities In fact I wanted to test it and report if something is wrong, but never actually got to it. Custom CSS without sanitizing it can be dangerous. PS: I think it is possible to steal someones account using that kind of XSS attack, but haven't drilled much in the topic. So..a good call, I would say.

You're only interested in the "Manual OC" section at this point. Run the app, check the "En" checkbox if it is not, then select desired core index from the dropdown that currently says "All Cores", then select desired multiplier and click Apply. This should set the multiplier on selected core and you can verify it in cpuz with a right click on the frequency. It should show the desired core running at the selected multiplier. All other cores in the same CCD will drop automatically to some lower frequency. I could not make wazza work, even on XP with the classic tweaks. // Edit, I've missed the 32bit libraries in the zip, so here's a new archive with everything included. ZenStates_2.0.0_debug_20210520.zip

Yes, seems to be gone, but I can't really tell if something is still applied, since the site uses the custom styles from my profile Some of the styles are a little off, due to some upgrades during the years though. The logo I had is gone. PS: Actually the custom css is still applied, the background on my profile page uses black/grey shade rather than the default blue of the rest of the pages.

I don't really understand what you're trying to say

Attached is a latest build. The functionality is quite limited, but I don't have time to actually finish it. Manual OC should work though. ZenStates_2.0.0_debug_20210507.zip

I don't have a new Asus motherboard, but I think it can't. You can use Shamino's "OC TOOL" from the link posted in this thread, it can control cores individually: You can also use ZenStates, but I'm at work right now and have no access to my PC at home. Will attach a latest build in the evening. Keep in mind there's some relation between core frequencies and your other cores will drop to lower frequency when you set 5GHz to a single core, but that's ok for a single-threaded benchmark. As for the devices, it's always a good idea to disable everything that is not needed, such as LAN, WiFi, Audio, etc. It is not required, though.

I had the same error on s.775 and could not figure out why. Changed the strap and it went away. Go figure...