Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

FireKillerGR

Members
  • Posts

    1756
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by FireKillerGR

  1. if u dont find a way just pm me in order to assist u through teamviewer (preparation of xp)
  2. this method WORKS but you will NOT be able to use any usb devices other than keyboard and mouse (no massive storage, etc).
  3. i5 6600K - 1.136v VID - ES (dont remember the batch - will update post later to add it) Needs 1.32v to boot @Win8 and run spi1m @5 Ghz, and same voltage for 4.9 Cinebench on air. Under cascade (-88C load on cascade's evap.) it did 5.8 GHz cinebench @1.536v load. Not delided
  4. Thanks Nacho, will do. @Barti27, yes you are right; I used X99 Champion but since I used the "prepopulate fields by previous submission" it kept the RIVE from the previous session.
  5. "Photo of the carnage" LMFAO
  6. Migh be interested in: VGA : 4.The happy trio of 5870 (Soc+Lightning+Matrix) -250 euro as a package deal 8.Gtx 560 Dcu2 -80 euro 9.Gtx 280 good clocker on air - 50 euro + One REX Total price?
  7. Hello everyone, I am selling a Corsair Plat Dom 2666 10-12-12 kit which can do 2800 MHz 9-12-12-1T with tight timings with less than 1.955v voltage on air. 2 sticks (the ones which can run Spi32m tight cl9 with 1.935v real - measured with fluke during load) are already insulated (plastik spray - not dip) but NEVER benched subzero. The other 2 sticks from the same kit run on the same settings with a small voltage increase (1.95v - 1.954v real measured with fluke during load) are still with stock heatsinks (no subzero on these as well). All sticks are working as new and come with box and fan. Buyer covers the shipping and Paypal fees. Price: 330 Euros for all 4 sticks. Insulated ones: http://i.imgur.com/3QR2My3.jpg (real 1.94v - can also run with 1.934v) Non-insulated ones: http://i.imgur.com/Xo2gnIg.jpg (real 1.954v) As for the RTL difference, its random (each boot -> different RTL on Auto) hehe Photos: http://i.imgur.com/gz4Jn6V.jpg https://scontent-fra3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xta1/v/t34.0-12/11329027_10206838657354734_524408981_n.jpg?oh=eaafc66407cba6c97c387ffba75611d7&oe=557064AF
  8. Damn, feel sorry about the mobo. GG & WP indeed (from your side as well). Have a save flight to Taipei, enjoy.
  9. Based on what Phil posted. On my 2852 score (which should be considered as Legit from all of you I guess) I got 14.26 FPS on GT1 @2090.3 MHz. On Coldest's score GT 1 (which is mostly Core depended for the last 2-3 years as far as I know and also the easiest to get "bugged" as far as Demac said) he got 14.72 FPS @1920.2 MHz - +0.5 FPS with -170 MHz on core and -100 MHz on mem. On Demac's 3057 Score GT1 = 16.10 FPS at 2142.6 FPS (+2 FPS with just +50 MHz) and on his 3122 Points score GT = 16.78 FPS @2168.7 (+2.5 FPS with +80 MHz). At stock the FPS / (default) MHz ratio should be > than FPS / OCed MHz ratio cause everyone knows that if you double the frequency you wont get double the GT Score (I got 0.0068 FPS per MHz on my legit OCed score while I had 0.0083~ ratio at default). These scores have more than 0.0075 FPS per MHz (after years of running FS I dont know that you could have such impact on the GT score on the same freq and card) and some even have 0.00773 if my calculations are correct. So we are talking about almost the perfect efficiency (perfect scaling from stock clocks to increased clocks)!
  10. Nah Allen, I get screen everytime but with many artifacts (of course I can see the image/benchmark test). Also voltage is set 1.65v~ from evbot which is 1.73 - 1.75v load @ -135C.
×
×
  • Create New...