I think it should be fine if it fits to the screenshot. It's just the damn sys-info which reads out crap

 

obviously cheating

guys, what could couse this error message?

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6373618

 

hmm ok retest solved it. weird.

it says hidden to me

Where is the link for the Wallpaper please, says Available here : then nothing after that

 

Edit : Found it by looking at a stage. Fix the rules section please

here you go

https://www.dropbox.com/s/53cqs6rvssgan1b/A%20gskill%20comp.jpg?dl=0

Edited March 31, 201510 yr by coolhand411

Make your bets,this is going to be the most epic sandbagging ever on hwbot,if only someone can crash the server one hour before competition ends

What about the wrong processor in FM-Link?

Sometimes it shows g3240 and sometimes G3460

Make your bets,this is going to be the most epic sandbagging ever on hwbot,if only someone can crash the server one hour before competition ends

 

I wonder if we see sub-8 in Super Pi

No chance, for that you'll need 116.5+ BCLK which is more than 3 BCLK over the highest known sandbag.

only the errors below are acceptable any other error makes score invalid.

 

YOUR RESULT HAS THE FOLLOWING PROBLEM(S):

 

1. Level of Detail (LOD) settings modified by NVIDIA driver, result invalid. Check your video driver settings. (What is this?)

 

2. Non-default settings were used in benchmark. Score could not be calculated. (What is this?)

 

3. Processor is not recognized (What is this?)

 

Regarding to error n.3 screenshot must match with the FM validation link(CPU frequency, memory tab)

 

PROCESSOR

1. Processor Intel® Pentium® CPU G3240 @ 3.10GHz

 

2. Reported stock core clock 3,100 MHz.

 

3. Third line must show the same CPU frequency as in screenshot.

Edited April 10, 201510 yr by Hiwa

What about this one?

only the errors below are acceptable any other error makes score invalid.

 

YOUR RESULT HAS THE FOLLOWING PROBLEM(S):

 

1. Level of Detail (LOD) settings modified by NVIDIA driver, result invalid. Check your video driver settings. (What is this?)

 

2. Non-default settings were used in benchmark. Score could not be calculated. (What is this?)

 

3. Processor is not recognized (What is this?)

 

Regarding to error n.3 screenshot must match with the FM validation link(CPU frequency, memory tab)

 

PROCESSOR

1. Processor Intel® Pentium® CPU G3240 @ 3.10GHz

 

2. Reported stock core clock 3,100 MHz.

 

3. Third line must show the same CPU frequency as in screenshot.

 

 

 

Also can you downclock for screenshot? or no

Edited April 10, 201510 yr by Splave

Help guys...this is the last weekend! We need answers...which maxxmem version has to be used? What about my problem with g3460?

Splave.

 

You can downclock as long as you don't have Error Number 3. Processor is not recognized.

Otherwise your frequency has to match the screenshot.

 

Dan.

 

Your frequency in the screenshot doesn't match what is reported in futuremark and you are getting the Processor is not recognized error.

Which will invalidate your run.

 

Have you asked about maxxmem version?

I asked about maxxmem Version!

And the screenshot I showed was just from another run...

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4411391

 

Compare These two...they match! but processor is shown as g3460

 

 

SAME here

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4411394

Edited April 11, 201510 yr by Dancop

MaxxMem version is as the HWBOT rules state: "Allowed benchmark versions: V1.95 or newer"

Kk...and what is with my problem? Roman asked for it some weeks ago, too

As long as the reported stock clock says "Reported stock core clock: 3,100 MHz", it's just the Futuremark website messing up and the result is fine.

Yes!!!!! Thx Pieter!

bring out your backups/sandbags lol

was a problem displaying the result on the 3dmark and nobody even wrote about it to help

The only thing I achived was to kill one of my best PI sticks.

I have 2 kits and one of them was clearly better.

The second one was unstable at tRCD 9 even with 2.15V and in fact didn't scale past that voltage.

First one did it easily at below 2.1V.

 

Looking back at scores, I actually had some chance if I had more LN2 and Samsung memory.

I thought more people would participate. Sure I could do better with 32M stage too.

 

Good luck to everyone in the finals. Maybe I would qualify some other time .

Edited April 13, 201510 yr by I.nfraR.ed