rtsurfer Posted July 26, 2015 Posted July 26, 2015 How am I supposed to get a Data File for Hwbot Prime on Mobile...? Quote
viper-rd Posted July 28, 2015 Posted July 28, 2015 I can not put the result stage 2 on ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus. This board has North Bridge NVIDIA nForce 650i SLI SPP rev A2. but here it is http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p5n32_e_sli_plus/ --- NFORCE 4 SLI X16 ??? Please fix this error. here is an example CPU-Z: http://valid.canardpc.com/lejs7d thank Quote
Massman Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 How am I supposed to get a Data File for Hwbot Prime on Mobile...?  For HWBOT Prime on mobile, you'll need to submit via the app.  I can not put the result stage 2 on ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus. This board has North Bridge NVIDIA nForce 650i SLI SPP rev A2. but here it is http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p5n32_e_sli_plus/ --- NFORCE 4 SLI X16 ??? Please fix this error. here is an example CPU-Z: http://valid.canardpc.com/lejs7d thank  Fixed Quote
bbaxter18 Posted August 3, 2015 Posted August 3, 2015 Massman, there is a bug in the Longest GPUPI 1B time, Anything over 24 hours reports as 2 days. my submission turned out like the other one. Quote
Massman Posted August 4, 2015 Posted August 4, 2015 Hm, you're correct. Thanks for the heads up, looking into the issue. Quote
GENiEBEN Posted August 13, 2015 Posted August 13, 2015 The sandbagging is strong in the GPUPI stage. Quote
Aleslammer Posted August 13, 2015 Posted August 13, 2015 The sandbagging is strong in the GPUPI stage.  I don’t think it’s sandbagging folks are still waiting for the runs to finish Quote
GENiEBEN Posted August 13, 2015 Posted August 13, 2015 I don’t think it’s sandbagging folks are still waiting for the runs to finish Dunno man, they had plenty of time, I spent 200+ hours on it already. Quote
trodas Posted August 14, 2015 Posted August 14, 2015 Go tell my X6800 Extreme, that he have plenty of time, and he even beat your longest run time in the end :-) Quote
lanbonden Posted August 14, 2015 Posted August 14, 2015 Question about the longest 1B run. Â Do you have to have uniform speed on the run for it to be alowed or would it be ok to remove some load after lets say 15 batches to speed it up in the end if it takes to long? Â how exact does the run need to be, would a run with an old motherboard without HPET that got a slight rounding error be valid? Aka a run where the batch times looks like the following example, yes I know its not valid or even complete like the screenshoot is now but wonder on the principle of the times. Quote
Rasparthe Posted August 14, 2015 Posted August 14, 2015 I'm fairly sure that if you get that bloody big red 'X' that it won't be accepted. If you don't, it's all good for submission no matter how you got there, speed up, slow down, its all good. Quote
BenchBrothers.de Posted August 18, 2015 Posted August 18, 2015 Is Skylake allowed for stages like DDR4 CL10 and fastest 3DMark99 1x 6600GT? Quote
xxbassplayerxx Posted August 18, 2015 Posted August 18, 2015 I believe it is not allowed since it wasn't released when the TC started. Quote
mori170 Posted August 19, 2015 Posted August 19, 2015 I'm trying to submit a score for slowest GPUPI, but it detects my core 2 duo E8400 as a FX-7500. Any idea why? Quote
Rasparthe Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 No, that's not necessary. GPUPI 2.2 indeed fixes a bug for these slowest result competitions, but it's nothing that can't be moderated manually. Although we will have a good look at slowest results made with GPUPI 2.1.x in the currently running team cup stage. That's for sure. Â If there is a bug that affects this competition shouldn't it be announced so that no one is inadvertently (or not) using it to slow the calculation. Especially since it can be moderated easily enough, or is this the type of bug that is more of a hack. I'm assuming that running stuff in the background to slow the calculation isn't considered a bug. Quote
trodas Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Slowing the already slow CPU by some settings are not forbidden or against the rules. The validity of resulting file counts most as well, as regularity of the Batch times, IMHO. Yes, I spoted one exploitable bug and I reported it ASAP and it cannot be publicaly mentioned right now. But I have no need to use it to slow down my score anymore  It is slow-enought, or is not it?   :D Quote
GENiEBEN Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 There's public API that allows to pause executing code. Also using a debugger (ida,wdasm etc.) you can simply step-in/pause, controlling each loop easily. Oh well, can't wait to get back from holiday and start the machine up. Quote
trodas Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Well, I prefer hardware way to do the slow-downs. In some cases it works great (Aquamark), but on other cases it produce mixed results (SuperPi 32M). Disabling L1 cache/L1+L2 caches on fully stable mainboards cause the SuperPi always fail on 32M test during it, tested on 3 different machines (Jetway V266B, 100x5 AXP-M, 2048MB 2-3-2-6 DDR1 Qimonda rams - PCchips M810LR, 100x11 Barton 2500+, 256MB 3-3-3-6 SDRAMs - MSI PM8M3-V, 200x17 Pentium 4 650, 2048MB 2-3-2-5 DDR1 OCZ rams): Â Â ...but that is a bit OT there (that is aimed at 12+h SuperPi 32M runs)... yet if you have some infos, pls drop me a PM or start a thread about this... Quote
Rasparthe Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 There's public API that allows to pause executing code. Also using a debugger (ida,wdasm etc.) you can simply step-in/pause, controlling each loop easily. Oh well, can't wait to get back from holiday and start the machine up. Â Okay, I see. Those actually interact with the actual program/code though. I can see why that would be banned. Â Does it mean that non-even loops will cause a sub to be disqualified? I know the current run I have has them uneven because I turned off the background program(s) to make sure it was actually running or had frozen up. I wish it wasn't so vague on what the rules are for this type of stage. A ten or twenty day run is a lot of time to have to rerun because of unclear rules. Quote
GENiEBEN Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Shouldn't be a problem, even in a normal fast run the loops aren't all going to be equal, by design (every 4 loops was it eh?). Quote
ObscureParadox Posted August 29, 2015 Posted August 29, 2015 Why are we splitting HWBot Prime for Pi up into a per core score? There was no mention of this previously, so in essence you will need a single core to win this which is just stupid since prime doesn't scale well with cores..... Quote
TASOS Posted September 6, 2015 Posted September 6, 2015 hwbot error , allows regular pc-system results to participate into raspberry pi category of team cup 2015. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.