oxyyy Posted April 28, 2009 Share Posted April 28, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=843058 Repored it 2 times but nothing happend. Benched with physX enabled... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VovaN Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684227 carry please in the category of Ddr3! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schub97 Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+9300+GE+%2820%29&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1473&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Sard´s sbmittted score with 2x geforce 9300 GE are wrong.It is an another card!You can see it on the screens. i have made a gpu-z-scrren for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrixXx Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 (edited) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=845791 It is an GTS 250 and not an 9800M GTS! It isnt a mobile card for laptops. Edited May 3, 2009 by StrixXx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=845791 It is an GTS 250 and not an 9800M GTS! It isnt a mobile card for laptops. Game Tests GT1 - Wings of Fury 773.18 FPS GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 812.54 FPS GT3 - Troll's Lair 312.35 FPS GT4 - Mother Nature 631.42 FPS GT2 and GT4 too high for single card, GT3 too low for SLI. Bugged score? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=845791 Blocked bugged run Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfroTweaker Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 Hello, this user takes the wrong time.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=853828 it´s 19.39s and not 15.95s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted May 18, 2009 Crew Share Posted May 18, 2009 please correct Hello Turrican thank you for the creation of a category X1300XT-DDR3 but in the category X13300XT-DDR2 few scores have already been reported and I can not do again Could you change these scores in the category-DDR3 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=816667 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684227 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=816669 Thank you very much best regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted May 18, 2009 Crew Share Posted May 18, 2009 thanks bro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Afrokalle Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Hello, this user takes the wrong time.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=853828 it´s 19.39s and not 15.95s Hello, this result is still wrong - i wanted to use the report function but it is not possible - the result has been moderated by hwbot crew... But the total computation time is not 17.34s - it is 21.06s - or i am wrong? Regards Afrokalle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 The 21.06 was solved also. This one is 19.39 and has been also taken care of by HWB Crew. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Afrokalle Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 (edited) OK sorry - i see only the wrong result with 17.34s and first place.. Maybe there´s a little problem with the refresh of the scores I see still this ranking: and the user on the first place hasn´t this time - when you only look at his clocks you´ll see that this isn´t possible.. Thanks Edited May 18, 2009 by Afrokalle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 It takes a while for HWB to update the rankings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618521 This score is simply not possible:p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 Fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted May 27, 2009 Crew Share Posted May 27, 2009 (edited) I report this score same days ago, and today I see validated this wrong VGA ( please see screen's.) But i think it was wrong, please re-check this bench Screen's : Link bench in hwbot: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=855956 Thank you Sw Edited May 27, 2009 by Sweet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Should be fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan1981 Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Yes, it should be fixed. Before few day ago I fixed one of his score. Problem is with the bot because in the forum he writes 8600GT (default 8600GT was with ddr3) and bot picks up 8600GT ddr2 instead of 8600GT ddr3.I will tell him to put extra ddr3 text in description on forum post in order to bot recognize the card properly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted May 28, 2009 Crew Share Posted May 28, 2009 Should be fixed Yes, it should be fixed.Before few day ago I fixed one of his score. Problem is with the bot because in the forum he writes 8600GT (default 8600GT was with ddr3) and bot picks up 8600GT ddr2 instead of 8600GT ddr3.I will tell him to put extra ddr3 text in description on forum post in order to bot recognize the card properly. Thank you both Sw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
road-runner Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 I dont understand why I did not get any points for 77th place and 76th and 78th do? http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=1279&applicationId=2&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=true&limit=100 Same thing on 06 with 3870x2 multi card, I am 36th? http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=1279&applicationId=12&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=true&limit=100 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loonym Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 It's because you got your global points with the 4870x2 runs RR. You aren't high enough with the 3870s to get HW points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 (edited) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500005 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=444773 These aren't 130nm chips. Edited May 30, 2009 by knopflerbruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted May 30, 2009 Crew Share Posted May 30, 2009 (edited) Please re-check this wrong score in Pifast xeon w3520, the correct score is: 21.06 seg Scrren's: Thank you Sw Edited May 30, 2009 by Sweet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Don_Dan Posted May 30, 2009 Crew Share Posted May 30, 2009 here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=853647 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.