xoqolatl Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 (edited) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860474 GT2 is way over the top. It's either a bugged run or a result of some illegal tweak. There's more of such results in HD4850 category, and some in other GPU's. EDIT: I see it has been deleted, good job now I have my cup back Edited June 28, 2009 by xoqolatl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evocarlos Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=871247 3 card in the single card category link to fourm post confirms it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rain Dropz Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628788 This score is way to high, cant be done with this card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Ok, I´ve got some results which were already moderated, but still don`t fit 100%. The first score is from one of my team mates: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=753325 He told me the CPU-Z-detection is wrong. Because of the "heavy overlocking" CPU-Z can`t detect the L2 cache properly and the Pentium 266 MHz turns into a Celeron. I`m not an advanced oldschool expert, but I know that oldschool hardware leads to problems with CPU-Z sometimes. Because of the fact that - he did tell the same for OC-lists at our forum (so it`s about integrity, not hwbot-specific) and - he would even loose 0.1 or 0.2 points in CPU-Z-category I ask you to move the result into this category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Pentium%202%20266Mhz%20(Deschutes) Now I`ve got some old scores which were moved several times before the right category was created by Turrican (Thx )a few weeks ago. So I ask you to move these results: 01: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565 03: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567 05: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568 AM3: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570 into Radeon X1550 256mb RV515 64 Bit category: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/Radeon%20X1550%20256mb%20RV%20515%2064%20bit (My 06 score is already there) Thank you so much in advance. *cough* *cough* You know I love the whole Hwbot crew idolatrously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenchBros Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 Hey guys, I have seen this result in the Top today! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=873159 And compared to all the other Score in this range of Time his CPU is minimum 400 MHz to low clocked to get this fest 1024M Score! Please check this, because I think he uses some illegal tweak? (don't know what but this can't be true) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 Hey guys, I have seen this result in the Top today! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=873159 And compared to all the other Score in this range of Time his CPU is minimum 400 MHz to low clocked to get this fest 1024M Score! Please check this, because I think he uses some illegal tweak? (don't know what but this can't be true) He probably used the Vista tweak that cuts off 10% of your score:p No idea how it works, but some mod told me it was legal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenchBros Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 He probably used the Vista tweak that cuts off 10% of your score:p No idea how it works, but some mod told me it was legal. but this is Windows XP for sure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 but this is Windows XP for sure! I'm no expert, but got the "Vista feel" when i saw it. Maybe XP skin for Vista, I dunno. Massman is the expert here, I'll leave it up to him;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReverendMaynard Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 It's done on XP guys, give it a rest lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rain Dropz Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=864577 This needs to be moved. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628788 This score is way to high, cant be done with this card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560385 This is clearly a Spitfire Duron (perhaps 600MHz) with CPUz frequency of ~1.2GHz. What the hell is it doing in Duron 1.6GHz (Applebred category) and furthermore claiming 2.8GHz+ overclock? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted July 14, 2009 Crew Share Posted July 14, 2009 it's also in the duron 600 category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560387 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 One more reason why the result in 1.6GHz category should be removed ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560385 This is clearly a Spitfire Duron (perhaps 600MHz) with CPUz frequency of ~1.2GHz. What the hell is it doing in Duron 1.6GHz (Applebred category) and furthermore claiming 2.8GHz+ overclock? Hate to quote myself, but do anyone wanna solve this issue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiborrr Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 La la la la mic check one two one two! :woot: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted July 16, 2009 Crew Share Posted July 16, 2009 (edited) tiborrr One two one two Fixed =) ________ PENNY STOCK PICK Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 He probably used the Vista tweak that cuts off 10% of your score:p No idea how it works, but some mod told me it was legal. lol umm no, OC is stand up guy and would never cheat. I will be beating that score this weekend though stay tuned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 lol umm no, OC is stand up guy and would never cheat. I will be beating that score this weekend though stay tuned It's not a cheat. AFAIK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 The following score has no validation or anything, and has been OK'ed because it's old. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511079 ...which is fair enough, but it's perhaps a good idea to add this validation link (grabbed from ripping.org) anyway It's the same score as the one on HWBot. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=75282 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 How come this one is not valid: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671223 and this one is: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559768 Both show photos of the validation screen;) To me it looks like the first decision was to not allow this type of screenies, so my score was blocked. Then new rules were applied, which is the reason why that other score was not blocked when I reported it. So please unblock my score:p (or block the other one, if that's the final decision...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 (edited) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597229 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615790 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586149 Dead links. But change "show_oc" to "show_oc.php", then thet will work. Edited July 18, 2009 by knopflerbruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Bruce, Please do not report all the scores with the broken validation links, these are old results and we don't need to get a report for every single one of them. hwbot will be fixing this issue for all scores in the DB shortly so sit tight till thats done. About the results using photos for validation, the first is an archive reult, done long before hwbot had any discussion about it. By default those results are validated. Yours was done in a transition period and is missing elements that are needed for a regular screen capture so you can't just look @ those two from a camera verification only perspective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Bruce, Please do not report all the scores with the broken validation links, these are old results and we don't need to get a report for every single one of them. hwbot will be fixing this issue for all scores in the DB shortly so sit tight till thats done. About the results using photos for validation, the first is an archive reult, done long before hwbot had any discussion about it. By default those results are validated. Yours was done in a transition period and is missing elements that are needed for a regular screen capture so you can't just look @ those two from a camera verification only perspective. Massman told me to report every broken one i could find;) I only checked top 5 of K8+K10 (Sempron + Turion still left). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted July 18, 2009 Share Posted July 18, 2009 Do not report them, we are working on a better fix that will save everyone time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 19, 2009 Share Posted July 19, 2009 Do not report them, we are working on a better fix that will save everyone time. I won't do it, then;) One of the reports were a bit different, though. There was no link in the submission, but I found it on ripping instead (think it was the 2nd placed Opty 146 score), so it needs to be added manually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.