janskuutteri Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12531&oldstyle=true almost all the 3dmark points more than the screen shot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartx Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 (edited) Thanks for fixing two scores, but why don't the third one: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=752376 just look at the description - if owner says, that card has 1710 mem clocks it can't be ddr2 card and two more results: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777965 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=544955 The same issue  EDIT: One more: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200 Edited March 13, 2009 by bartx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 Thanks for fixing two scores, but why don't the third one:http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=752376 just look at the description - if owner says, that card has 1710 mem clocks it can't be ddr2 card  exactly;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basco Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 should be wrong resolution: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=828254 Â thanks for your time and effort Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oxyyy Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 yes look @ verification link -> resolution 1024x768... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbjaust Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Hi, with this score that has been locked for editing: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723631 Â I'd like to add what video card is in the system: a GeForce 8800 GTS 640. Â Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbjaust Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 it's a 2D benchie;) so VGA details are not required;)  True, but I like my results to have all the information because then only the best score of each combination shows up in the summaries  Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monteboy Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 (edited) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833393  Check the screenshot , antialiazing is off in the Score result only for the Score number ..... I think he use Photoshop to wrote the Number. Here an compare between Hipros Result window and from this user both on WindowsXP  Left the Score Window from PCBeast , right the score window from Hipro  http://www.abload.de/img/compareewyh.png  Second he has an Q9650 CPU but the 3dmark03 Window shows only the Frequency (tipical for an i7 CPU) not the whole CPU - String like on all other 3dmark03 Scores for this CPU Edited March 19, 2009 by monteboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perko Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=833523 157k-3Dmark03-2X4870X2  Has a higher fps than andreyang with 170,000 score,and GT1 and GT2 were compared with the nature of very small (BUG)  Needs more proof  Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted March 20, 2009 Crew Share Posted March 20, 2009 i wondering what's wrong with this guy http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=18982 Â Â he reported all scores of this category, altough they have valid screen http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted March 20, 2009 Crew Share Posted March 20, 2009 yeah, looks like so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScunnyUK Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 (edited) Hi, Is this score a cheat?> Â http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632592 Â Although it may be before the date for needing GPU-Z, which it was originally moderated for, If you checkthe screenshot link and look closely the score tab shows 14206 marks but on the 3DMark 05 tab in the result part it shows 1407** where the user has tried to cover with CPU-Z memory tab ! Thanks Gaz! Edited March 23, 2009 by ScunnyUK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=785877 Â Definately wrong version of pifast (compare Total Physical Memory Allocated with other submissions... not to mention the clock speed vs time), and no CPUZ screenie either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phant0m Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 on screen old SuperPi and Celeron 2.4Ghz Northwood in Celeron D320 Prescott category ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hydrotoxin Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=828131 Â Can you tell me why such results are getting blocked because of the missing "details" window? Â I cannot find that in the rules of 3DMark06. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BendgerWilson Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Can you please check these PCMark 05 results - they have "HDD XP startup" more than 220. I think it is not allowed? 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=824951 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=816790 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=753555 4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=799823 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samendk Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Needs more proof - missing "details" window http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=824750 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=825614 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=825615 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=785877Â Definately wrong version of pifast (compare Total Physical Memory Allocated with other submissions... not to mention the clock speed vs time), and no CPUZ screenie either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Don_Dan Posted March 30, 2009 Crew Share Posted March 30, 2009 Those scores are exactly the same, same username as well, just written a bit different, you will see what I mean when you look at them. One of the scores needs to be deleted: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=816176 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=816299 Also it's weird, for one user I can access his profile, for the other one it's not possible. How is that possible? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Don_Dan Posted March 31, 2009 Crew Share Posted March 31, 2009 one is from forum scan, user hasn't linked his account to that forum yet, so double entry  okay, thanks for the explanation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) * gpu-z in screenshot, dropdown must be visible if you run in SLI so all videocards are identified. Rivatuner may be used if GPU-Z fails to identify videocard properly (as of 8 oct 2007) According the rules, If I use crossfireX dropdown isn't neccesary? Edited April 1, 2009 by OverDozeD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 OverDozeD, don't try to mess with us just because your score was blocked. If you try to find loopholes in rules just to find them, we'll apply them very strict when we come across your results ... Â Just to point out: yes, please show the dropdown box. Scores won't be blocked if only the dropdown box isn't shown, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) @Massman OverDozeD, don't try to mess with us just because your score was blocked Actually I didn't think of to mess with you:) Â I don't care about score, that was good lesson for me but the question was quite serious, not kiddin or smth like that. Â thx 4 reply Edited April 1, 2009 by OverDozeD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 mess with us?  whats wrong with u guys? u think u're gods or something like that?  ain't shit 4 me dude   talk like a normal human   mess with u!!  lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 yes we are gods, because we try to moderate fair. and fair moderation puts us into god-mode;)  One note, God never tries And proving that some1 is unmistakable is simply an nonsence  just 4 fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.