westsider Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 No Comments any more give it up Gio make better screens next time you are discussing with GODs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverDozeD Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 No Comments any more give it up Gio make better screens next time you are discussing with GODs OMG No, sorry, OMhwmods OK, done Next time I'll do rock solid screens, even GODs cant block'em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 and whats if i am an atheist? and i dont give a damn about gods wher are my human rights ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 My God is Dirk Meyer:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topalof Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 hi, I did not know where post my message, so i apologize if this is the wrong section. I had a bad link for the validation FM of my 3dm05 score, which was blocked, and i just change it to put the good link. I was advised to report to the moderation. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837549 http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=4815132&compareResultType=12 thank you bye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted April 13, 2009 Crew Share Posted April 13, 2009 (edited) Unblocked. ORB link is valid ________ Shinto Advice Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topalof Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 thank you bye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Overclock Device Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632534 This result (wPrime) can be "wrong". This Katmai (single cpu), at 630 mhz, is too fast. The next Katmai (sinlge cpu) is this, at 644 mhz: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=817090 Siouxx's PC: Pentium 3 450 @ 630 128Mb Ram - 4 min 3 sec - Kolian's PC: Pentium 3 450 @ 644 384Mb Ram - 4 min 55 sec - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Here are two 2mx400 results, that's impossible to get such scores on 290/215MHz. Just check other results in this category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819708 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819707 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan1981 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 It came to my attention that now exist the new Radeon 2600 PRO ddr3 category. I edited my all scores(I hope ) achieved with Radeon 2600PRO with ddr3 memory and now these scores are in right category(in the time of the submition category of 2600pro ddr3 didn't exist). My 2 scores are validated and checked by moderator(not the best score with HW) and I can't change the category for them. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735331 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688501 It can be problem because I will have results with the same card in two category, and yes I will have more HW points for that, but this is not right and not according to rules, and it will be nice if moderator can edit category(change to radeon HD 2600pro gddr3 category) of this 2 scores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junior-21- Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 hello. i think this score is not valid http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727604 lack of details on screen. i reported it but it wasnot blocked. why is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 (edited) because it's not suspicious so what's the point to block the score?? higher clocks than others,I don't see any problem u should report these scores because of missing resolution on the ss http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=842434 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838106 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=842436 Edited April 18, 2009 by 71proste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junior-21- Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 its ok. i thought it was necessary for a score to be ok. you are right about the first 2 links. what is wrong with tha 3rd link which is mine score? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=785877 It's like 35% too fast for the clocks:p No doubt it's not the correct version. No CPUZ either, just some other program. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=785877 It's like 35% too fast for the clocks:p No doubt it's not the correct version. No CPUZ either, just some other program. Wrong PiFast version used (memory allocated 61757kb instead of 61372kb) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Wrong PiFast version used (memory allocated 61757kb instead of 61372kb) I've seen that before. I'm glad the other version is so easy to spot;) More scores that need to be moved/deleted: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500005 - DFI never made a 940 mobo. And the clock is WAY above what these chips can do... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=444773 - Says DFI nf4 Ultra-D, which is socket 939 - not 940... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 its ok. i thought it was necessary for a score to be ok. you are right about the first 2 links. what is wrong with tha 3rd link which is mine score? hehe,my mistake I am sorry mate u r right wrong link pasted:rolleyes:,already edited Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Overclock Device Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560384 No verification link, no screenshot. Not good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hydrotoxin Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 (edited) My PCMark 05 scores #1/#2 have been blocked because insufficient verification for rankings (Please provide validation link Suspicious cause you test various systems but only in several cases you use such fast HDD subsystem) I don't know why my score should be suspicious, just because I started benching with my two SSD's that came to me out of rma?? Edited April 20, 2009 by hydrotoxin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted April 20, 2009 Crew Share Posted April 20, 2009 (edited) hydrotoxin That`s OK. I just don`t know what HDDs you use Please provide one valid ORB link, so I can see all subtests is OK. ________ Ship Sale Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hydrotoxin Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 (edited) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=844718 -> http://service.futuremark.com/results/showSingleResult.action?resultId=1940138&resultType=13 Edited April 20, 2009 by hydrotoxin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted April 20, 2009 Crew Share Posted April 20, 2009 (edited) hydrotoxin Ok! Thank you. Your scores will be unblocked in few minutes. Sorry for being too suspicious ________ Druze forums Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hydrotoxin Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 Thank you for unblocking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenchBros Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 can someone tell me what T-Rex have done to get this score legaly? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=842010 for me, compared to all the other 03 Results in the Top Ranks, it looks like a bugged 03 run... only 6G (secound place runs 6,4) and "only" 990 GPU (secound place runs 1070) this result makes no sense to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Don_Dan Posted April 23, 2009 Crew Share Posted April 23, 2009 Read today's newspost! And first place has just changed to hipro5 again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.