komadyret Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=641935 - no cpu-z, gpu-z screens. Too high score for such clocks. May be a SLI run. SM3 is a bit high for single card Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dualist Posted October 31, 2009 Share Posted October 31, 2009 I believe these scores are from a card with a lower spec cards bios.... http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875314 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875315 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875317 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875320 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875323 Shaders are wrong. Shaders on a 7600LE are as shown.. Those shaders in those benches are from a higher card, the 7600GS, 7600GT or the 7650GS. The guy in question has a 7650GS benched in his profile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Overclock Device Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I think this result is too high: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=577710 The screen is incomplete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|ron Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Guys, that's a score from a team mate of mine: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=782542 It has been invalidated because the ORB link is missing because it's a top20 result... But it's not in top20, it's far from being in top20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Overclock Device Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I don't find this score "too high". check the submission date also...P4 + Geforce 4 have been consistently scoring high in Aquamark on Win2000/XP Results of nVidia Ti4800: 1) 46.098 (the screen shows only aquamark score) 2) 36.179 3) 36.061 4) 34.983 5) 34.887 6) 33.037 ecc. Is it Normal? O_o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|ron Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 ^^ most likely he made a typo in his score:) I understood what has happened there... the score was in top20 one year ago! I didn't noticed that was October 2008 and not 2009! So, as of today it's far from top20 but when it was posted... so, if you want to proceed judging it "not valid" I think it's fair. Thanks jmke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Overclock Device Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 yes http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=301&applicationId=10&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=false&limit=100I know for a fact check the CPU and GPU scores compared to the other results; somehow P4 + GF4 back then really scored high in Aquamark, go figure? maybe a driver version/OS advantage? Where is your screen? Deleted? P4 goes better than Core2Duo? 10k points better with a P4? I don't think that. Moreover, i think that when the screen shows only the aquamrk score is against the rules, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterStoba Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I believe these scores are from a card with a lower spec cards bios.... http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875314 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875315 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875317 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875320 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875323 Shaders are wrong. Shaders on a 7600LE are as shown.. Those shaders in those benches are from a higher card, the 7600GS, 7600GT or the 7650GS. The guy in question has a 7650GS benched in his profile. Just in case you've missed this one jmke, but I understand you're a busy guy I'd appreciate it if you could look into it, because I've tried and tried and this score is just not possible using a 7600LE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I understood what has happened there... the score was in top20 one year ago!I didn't noticed that was October 2008 and not 2009! So, as of today it's far from top20 but when it was posted... so, if you want to proceed judging it "not valid" I think it's fair. Thanks jmke Maybe we need a moderation button for this type of blocked scores... so that we get a notification... say 6 months after the submission date so we can unblock those that are no longer in top20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|ron Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Maybe we need a moderation button for this type of blocked scores... so that we get a notification... say 6 months after the submission date so we can unblock those that are no longer in top20. interesting function, only visible by staff members of course Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Overclock Device Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 after 6 years some things vanish, the aquamark SS rule was made in 2008. score was made in 2003, with valid AQM3 link at the time etc etc.. One of my results was deleted from the ranking because the screen is busy of windows. Why you can keep a result without screen but i can't preserve a result with screen (800x600)? http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=195656&thumb=false Can you restore it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 One of my results was deleted from the ranking because the screen is busy of windows. Why you can keep a result without screen but i can't preserve a result with screen (800x600)?http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=195656&thumb=false Can you restore it? The missing info would be the first loop times, and the "1m calculation" part (Rules: http://hwbot.org/benchmark.application.info.do?applicationId=3#rules) IMO this is just minor stuff, 19 loops means 1m AFAIK too. Plus, the score doesn't look weird. I vote for unblock, but I'd like to have a second opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genetix Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 (edited) Still cannot validate the 32M score. No matter it seems what I do states 'Invalid Validation' or something on webpages. Using Q9450 on Modded Motherboard BIOS Intel X38 running at 3,6Ghz on DDR2 at 900Mhz. Any idea how to get this working v1.55 states there's no longer accepting scores, v2.00 says invalid and been this way like past as long I remember wPrime. http://i38.tinypic.com/5fovnl.png Funny thing is I managed to validate 1024M score just fine. Edited November 7, 2009 by genetix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genetix Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 (edited) Wprime 2.00 is not supported at the bot. So, what then is? There's not really many real benchmark softwares out there. Plus all are x86 based which today technology is same as faking all scores even wPrime but at least it knew how to properly multi-thread. Edited November 7, 2009 by genetix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genetix Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 http://hwbot.org/benchmark.application.info.do?applicationId=141.55 And this one I also tested states that it's not anymore accepted & error on web page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 And this one I also tested states that it's not anymore accepted & error on web page. Post a screenshot instead. That always works;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostisbest Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 hi can someone please look at my 3d06 score i have submited trying to get it sorted out, it wont update it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 it says you dont participate in the rankings ie you have to check the box at the bottom before you submit saying that you want a score nice run btw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostisbest Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 (edited) even if i tick or not it still should show up in the wr top 20 Edited November 8, 2009 by boostisbest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostisbest Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 ok thanks for the reply holding on tight lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostisbest Posted November 8, 2009 Share Posted November 8, 2009 ok thanks for the reply holding on tight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostisbest Posted November 9, 2009 Share Posted November 9, 2009 STILL holding on tight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemehnert Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 hi got my my scores blocked in wiprime ... again... here are the links. i dont see any reason why these are invalid. if Im missing something please help=) http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=920304 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=920303 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted November 14, 2009 Crew Share Posted November 14, 2009 they are not blocked, somebody just reported them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486Nothing happened yet. Some goes for this one, which was mentioned by u22 (thx ) in this thread. I reported it already, too. See, neither I open threads for trivial requests as so much other guys do immediately (and get an answer asap unfortunately...), nor I annoy moderators somewhere else. But this official modest way leads to nothing and I have no idea what else to do. No answer or action after months and several friendly reminders, but I still think that the mentioned scores @ the first link have to get moved and it`s not fun at all to steal a validation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.