July 16, 200816 yr http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615455http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615450 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675140 LOL! At least they use the same OS installation, mobo and memory. I'm willing to bet they use the same chip as well, 3 different ES's that have almost indentical potential:D Maybe they didn't know about the HW sharing policy:confused: If they claim all scores are real I'd be interested in knowing how they can explain why everything seems almost identical:p
July 16, 200816 yr Hello everybody Wanted to show you sth ... AppleWolf (here is his profile http://www.hwbot.org/searchMembers.do?userId=8542&name=AppleWolf), has posted 4 results in the X1650 AGP category, however done with a X1650 PCI-E ... (look at his GPU-Z tab ... ) AppleWolf's 3Dmark 2001 - with a X1650 PCI-E http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=749436 AppleWolf's 3Dmark 2003 - with a X1650 PCI-E http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=749431 AppleWolf's 3Dmark 2005 - with a X1650 PCI-E http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=749432 AppleWolf's 3Dmark 2006 - also with a X1650 PCI-E http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=749433 I reported the scores, and told the reason I did that too, but I've noticed that now I can't report them ... I can assume that means, that hwbot.team has seen them, and didn't notice that we 're talking about a PCI-E X1650 here ? Why didn't AppleWolf ask for a new X1650 PCI-E category, instead of posting scores done with an E8500 + X1650 PCI-E in the AGP category ? Please remove them ... Also : Serban's 3Dmark 2005 score (here it is : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=746643) has no verification AT ALL ! ... If you press the link to forumpost you will find yourself here ... http://www.xtrempc.ro/forum/viewtopic.php?p=612268#612268 In Serban's post, you will find the submission but no image (unless they have removed the image 'cause the result is two years old ?) ... Here's what I see anyway ... Monstru's 3Dmark 2003 is also wrong ... He is using a X1650Pro ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=752369 <-- his score http://forum.crazypc.ro/showpost.php?p=84401 <-- his link to forumpost (where you clearly see he's using a X1650Pro running at stock clocks (600/800) ... I think we are now ok Please create a new X1650 PCI-E category so that AppleWolf can enjoy his scores Do not delete them, just move them I would be also pleased if you could move the other scores too, in their right category Thanks in advance, my best regards, George
July 16, 200816 yr I notice that alot of old scores have missing screenshots, not just the one you just mentioned. Why is that? Something is a bit weird here;) Are all images deleted after two years or so+ I see that even when I search XS, images in oooold threads have vanished, which is annoying when I look for mods etc... but to have a score deleted that way is much, much worse. I'm planning to buy a couple of memory sticks for my screenshots, just in case they start disappearing from HWbot, too...
July 17, 200816 yr I notice that alot of old scores have missing screenshots, not just the one you just mentioned. Why is that? Something is a bit weird here;) Are all images deleted after two years or so+ I see that even when I search XS, images in oooold threads have vanished, which is annoying when I look for mods etc... but to have a score deleted that way is much, much worse. I'm planning to buy a couple of memory sticks for my screenshots, just in case they start disappearing from HWbot, too... I've noticed that too ... Don't know what this is ... Maybe a problem of imageshack or what ? That's a great idea, about old scores ...
July 17, 200816 yr Just a quick Q. wprime doesnt detect my Q9450's clock speed, and worst of all when i submit directly it submits as a E E6700 or similar. So after i submit I edit it to match my CPU, is this righ, or must i write something in the REASON for Edit box?
July 18, 200816 yr I don't want to have to report each score individually, but this user has a lot of results that need more proof. All his 3dmark results have 'validation link' pointing to an incomplete screenshot on his own web server. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=11987 And someone else...(no proof) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682979 Edited July 18, 200816 yr by [DR]r1ch
July 20, 200816 yr Guys what about that ? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=22591&postcount=119 Thanks in advance, George
July 22, 200816 yr This card is the 'pro' version not 'xt' which also [i think makes it pcie n0ot agp. the only thing to go by is the orb link which doesnt clarify between 'agp' or 'pcie' a gpuz screen does. whichever it is, its in the wrong category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=755077 The user also has entries in 3d01 and 3d03. Also this one, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750583 No clarification if this is an agp or pcie card here, Id say most likely pcie going by the score. only a gpuz screen offers info on if these cards are 'pcie' or 'agp' obviously the category is for 'agp' cards. both versions were released for this card. If you check my score I show gpuz screens deliberately to show its an agp card not the faster pcie version. Edited July 22, 200816 yr by BUSTAMOVE
July 22, 200816 yr This card is the 'pro' version not 'xt' which also [i think makes it pcie n0ot agp. the only thing to go by is the orb link which doesnt clarify between 'agp' or 'pcie' a gpuz screen does. whichever it is, its in the wrong category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=755077 The user also has entries in 3d01 and 3d03. Also this one, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750583 No clarification if this is an agp or pcie card here, Id say most likely pcie going by the score. only a gpuz screen offers info on if these cards are 'pcie' or 'agp' obviously the category is for 'agp' cards. both versions were released for this card. If you check my score I show gpuz screens deliberately to show its an agp card not the faster pcie version. He used a Gigabyte GA-K8NS Nforce 3 - at least that's what it says in the description (even if it's not proven that he actually did). nf3 is an AGP only chipset afaik, so this seems to be an AGP card, not pcie.
July 22, 200816 yr Thanks for that. but click the first link above and check validation link, edited in as x800, but orb reads the card as the 'pro' version, not 'xt' Edited July 22, 200816 yr by BUSTAMOVE
July 22, 200816 yr Thanks for that. but click the first link above and check validation link, edited in as x800, but orb reads the card as the 'pro' version, not 'xt' The first one is read as pro, so it should probably be in that category. But it's an AGP card, socket A boards with pcie don't exist afaik. Could also be blocked since it's not clear where it belongs - which is caused by the missing GPUZ screenshot. The 2nd one seems correct, the ORB reads it as an x800xt pe. it also says that the mobo is a gigabyte board, model unknown. The user says it's an nf3 board, and I can't seem to find any evidence against that, so it has to be the agp version. But again, there is no GPUZ screenshot, and if there's doubt: block the score IMO.
July 25, 200816 yr i think i've submitted proof enough to have my score 30052/3dm05 accepted. respectfully, yozuri
July 25, 200816 yr Resolution Not shown (and is a 6800GT in 6800 categ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971 Resolution Not shown: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=749279 Geforce 6800 ultra in 6800(simple) AGP http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024 Geforce 6800GS PCI Express in AGP categ (abit GD8 havent AGP): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554919 FAKE: Rivatunner have the focus in taskbar but no window rivatuner focus. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686843 Ati X1050 in 9550 categ: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346 Edited August 22, 200816 yr by maxine
July 30, 200816 yr 3Dmark 2005 - 17234 marks - Gamer ([M]adshrimps.BE OC-Team) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648037 date event user description 18 Sep 2007 09:22 created Gamer manual online submission 19 Sep 2007 06:36 checked (crew) Massman checked by a moderator () X1900 CF ... into X1900XTX single card category.
July 30, 200816 yr I am also looking for a vanished result. I had a Dothan M740 superpi 1M result of (22.844 sec) submitted on early 2007. I cant find it anymore. What happened ?
August 4, 200816 yr Allmost all scores is wrong, 99% VGA is 8700M not 8800M GTX http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1262&name=GeForce+8800M+GTX+%2844%29
August 5, 200816 yr Looks Like Sli but ranked as single & Wrong category 512mb card ranked as 1024mb. It`s too fast For single card & CPU / Gpu Clock (Single 8800GT & Q6600 @ 3.6ghz over 6XXXX @ 03 not possible) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=757896
August 11, 200816 yr 3Dmark 2005 - 17234 marks - Gamer ([M]adshrimps.BE OC-Team) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648037 X1900 CF ... into X1900XTX single card category. I am also looking for a vanished result. I had a Dothan M740 superpi 1M result of (22.844 sec) submitted on early 2007. I cant find it anymore. What happened ? Bump up ....
August 11, 200816 yr http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=722946 lga775 3.4Ghz cpu in s478 2.8Ghz category
August 12, 200816 yr Once a score has been moderated, i am not able to delete it. Is there a way to get them deleted? E.g. i would like to delete: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=744854 I would like to clean up my benchmarks so that only the top scores for each of my hardware entries remain (lowering my results total and hence improving my points/result ratio).
August 12, 200816 yr You should be able to delete them, I think? If you click on the "+" icon in front of the score, do you see a wastebin icon appearing underneath the details of that particular score? If yes, click it. I don't really understand why you're so eager to clean up your scores. Points/result ratio is a worthless statistic, because all you have to do to have the best ratio is own the SuperPi 1M world record and delete all your other scores. Furthermore, your ratio will probably be screwed by all the 0.x point scores you have. Next to that, it's also interesting for other users to compare their best scores against your average scores. I know that when I'm benching, I check out scores that are a bit better than mine to compare what I need to work on.
August 18, 200816 yr This score; http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718801 I dont believe this is possible, also in the description it is reported as a 'gto' card? but submitted to x800 xt category. as you can see this score is 11 thousand points higher than the 2nd place card, which seems to be way out of sync with other scores in the category. reporting of this result has been disabled hence my reporting it here. No gpuz screen either. This score is in fact more in line with scores in the x800 gto category. it looks like the score was submitted to the wrong category. :] Edited August 18, 200816 yr by BUSTAMOVE
August 19, 200816 yr Just noticed some funny things http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758431 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=757901 Simply amazing clock speeds! Obviously just a cpu-z mis reading or something no biggy
August 21, 200816 yr http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750127 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732603 Scores are blocked, but both were done running default settings - you can't change anything in free version 3DM 2003. In 2001 if you change something, below score is message "Benchmark was not run using default settings" or sth.
August 22, 200816 yr Resolution Not shown (and is a 6800GT in 6800 categ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971 Resolution Not shown: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=749279 Geforce 6800 ultra in 6800(simple) AGP http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024 Geforce 6800GS PCI Express in AGP categ (abit GD8 havent AGP): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554919 FAKE: Rivatunner have the focus in taskbar but no window rivatuner focus. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686843 Ati X1050 in 9550 categ: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.