March 4, 20169 yr Hello, I want to share HWBot Prime Tweak to the next level performance. So i think will be alot of people re-benching Check at my score efficiency with i3 6100 @ 4707MHz : speed.fastest`s HWBOT Prime score: 4893.54 pps with a Core i3 6100 The magic is JRE 9 64bit combined with Windows 10 x64 I hope this will easier to who that find HWBot Prime Tweak. Edit: Build 108 seems like not working with HWBot Prime. Try build 107 or 106. Edit 2 : Link added : JRE 9 EA Build 106 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2mrL4IrCzQEb3dCTlRmYTgyWlU/view?usp=sharing Edit 3 : Link added : JRE 9 EA Build 107 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2mrL4IrCzQEcjZSUTFVTmRmMEU/view?usp=sharing Added guide how to fix broken saving score function for JRE9 118 or above from @Spiedie tl:dr https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45025086/hwbot/HWBotPrimeFor9.zip, extract and double click run.cmd get activation.jar out of JAF 1.1 from Java Archive Downloads - Java Platform Technologies get jaxb .jars from lib folder, downloaded from https://jaxb.java.net/2.2.11/ place jars in same folder (need hwbotprime-0.8.3.jar, activation.jar, jabx-api.jar, jaxb-core.jar, jaxb-impl.jar) create file run.cmd or run.bat with contents: start javaw -cp .\* org.hwbot.bench.BootStrap double click run if you still can't save datafiles, replace javaw with java to see the errors Edited August 16, 20169 yr by speed.fastest
March 4, 20169 yr Crew For me those scores looks buggy. The old behavior was, first run slow, second run faster by 20-40 points. Now with java9 the first run is at least 100 points faster than the second one and you simply cant reproduce the first one.
March 4, 20169 yr Administrators Why buggy? I mean it is different Java, and I tested and results were reproducable within margins after every reboot, frequency scaling was logical and I simply think as much as 9 changed results it might as well have changed the characteristics of rerun orgys. Sure it needs observation, but when software base changes, also characteristics of result optimization can change. Let´s simply watch it, for the start I think all works normal
March 5, 20169 yr Author Lol Update : Only build 107 or 106 works. Let me upload it for you if you cant find it.
March 6, 20169 yr test g3258 version : 8.0.110.12 os : win7 64 4,7ghz 4228.16 test g3258 version : 9.0.0.53 os : win7 64 4,7ghz 4337 test g3258 version : 9.0.x.x os : win7 64 4,7ghz 4429
March 6, 20169 yr This is what you get if you throw every java you can get at every system you can get your hands on. 5 runs per java version, 80+ different java versions. Ill let everyone else test skylake Min 3583.77, max 3591.22, diff 7.45, ratio 0.21%, best jre8u31 i5-2400S Min 3602.00, max 3608.58, diff 6.58, ratio 0.18%, best jre7u51 i7-2630QM Min 7458.67, max 7499.40, diff 40.73, ratio 0.55%, best jre7u15 2xE5-2670 Min 4589.02, max 5390.52, diff 801.50, ratio 17.47%, best jre9u83 i5-3570k 4Ghz Min 4919.96, max 4958.63, diff 38.67, ratio 0.79%, best jre7u76 i7-4712MQ Min 1555.62, max 1592.32, diff 36.70, ratio 2.36%, best jre6u3 D925 Min 3989.60, max 4384.42, diff 394.82, ratio 9.90%, best jre6u20 G3258 4.7Ghz Min 1639.32, max 1643.54, diff 4.22, ratio 0.26%, best jre8u51 G470 Min 1666.20, max 1698.01, diff 31.81, ratio 1.91%, best jre7u71 Atom Z3740D
March 6, 20169 yr Crew test g3258version : 8.0.110.12 os : win7 64 4,7ghz 4228.16 test g3258 version : 9.0.0.53 os : win7 64 4,7ghz 4337 test g3258 version : 9.0.x.x os : win7 64 4,7ghz 4429 How many runs is this ? I tried 10 consecutieve runs on a 2600K, 3770K, 4770K & 5960x and didn't get any significant boost with the new 9 106-107 Java version versus my preferred ones ( version depending on the CPUs )... usually the new 9 version was even slower lol... We are looking for a whopping boost of +400/500points as with Skylake... Edited March 6, 20169 yr by Leeghoofd
March 6, 20169 yr Now i've compared two Version of Java with Win10 64Bit. Hitting the "Quick Benchmark" Button 3 times. JRE8u73/64 JRE9ea+106/64
March 6, 20169 yr Lol Update : Only build 107 or 106 works. Let me upload it for you if you cant find it. So that was the reason hwbot prime wasn't launching for me...
March 6, 20169 yr Author @Digg_de Nice test! Identical to me, Windows 10 x64 is more constant & better score.
March 6, 20169 yr Author So only work with skylake? Thanks for the test. because at the moment i dont have any other platfotm.
March 7, 20169 yr I can confirm its working on Ivy-E with Win7 64bit. Edited March 7, 20169 yr by MetalRacer
March 7, 20169 yr So Spiedie's best efficiency is with jre6u20 (Win7?) Min 3989.60, max 4384.42, diff 394.82, ratio 9.90%, best jre6u20 G3258 4.7Ghz And Raules had better luck with version : 9.0.x.x on W7 64 test g3258 version : 9.0.x.x os : win7 64 4,7ghz 4429 I guess it's time to do some testing and see what I get
March 7, 20169 yr Crew @MetalRacer: Interesting development your old java was the fastest one or did you use an 8 version ? What was the points increase from that version to the 9 one? Edited March 7, 20169 yr by Leeghoofd
March 8, 20169 yr I was using 8 and then switched to 9. I compared the best of five scores between the two and version 9 was 300 points higher.
March 8, 20169 yr Author Nice to see other platform get 300 points boost. I hope i can try to other platform.
March 8, 20169 yr I'll try on s775 soon. edit: No boost with s775 here: other JRE: JRE9: Edited March 8, 20169 yr by Digg_de
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.