Massman Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 (edited) Okay, so Ryzen launch day is coming up by the end of next month. I figured we should make it clear what the performance targets are. Below a list of all AMD records with consumer hardware (no opteron). AMD 2D Records (benchmarks with global points) [table=head]Benchmark | Architecture | Score | Date | Overclocker | CPU | Motherboard | link Cinebench - R11.5 | Vishera | 13.230 | 2016-12-30 | Niuulh | FX-9590 ( 7648.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link Cinebench - R15 | Vishera | 1218.000 | 2016-12-30 | Niuulh | FX-9590 ( 7679.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link CPU Frequency | Vishera | 8722.780 | 2014-08-29 | The Stilt | FX-8370 ( 8722.78 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link Geekbench3 - Multi Core | Vishera | 22070.000 | 2016-12-30 | Niuulh | FX-9590 ( 7477.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link HWBOT Prime | Vishera | 8308.640 | 2016-12-30 | Niuulh | FX-9590 ( 7806.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link GPUPI for CPU - 1B | Vishera | 187.730 | 2016-12-22 | Niuulh | FX-9590 ( 7806.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link PiFast | Deneb | 15.660 | 2011-08-08 | Mad222 | Phenom II X4 955 BE ( 7015.30 MHz) | GA-890FXA-UD7 |link SuperPi - 1M | Vishera | 9.125 | 2013-12-02 | der8auer | FX-8350 ( 8221.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula |link SuperPi - 32M | Vishera | 559.828 | 2013-12-15 | HiVizMan | FX-8350 ( 7910.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link wPrime - 1024m | Thuban | 121.531 | 2010-07-23 | Mad222 | Phenom II X6 1090T BE ( 6384.40 MHz) | GA-890FXA-UD7 |link wPrime - 32m | Thuban | 3.796 | 2010-07-23 | Mad222 | Phenom II X6 1090T BE ( 6466.00 MHz) | GA-890FXA-UD7 |link [/table] AMD 3D Records (benchmarks with global points) [table=head]Benchmark | Architecture | Score | Date | Overclocker | CPU | Motherboard | link 3DMark - Fire Strike | Vishera | 16331.000 | 2016-01-31 | Lio40 | FX-9590 ( 6220.75 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula |link 3DMark - Fire Strike Extreme | Vishera | 13216.000 | 2014-11-15 | Sgt Bilko | FX-9590 ( 5307.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link 3DMark - Time Spy | Vishera | 7043.000 | 2016-12-15 | oneyouhate | FX-8350 ( 4615.00 MHz) | \N |link 3DMark Vantage - Performance | Vishera | 59084.000 | 2016-12-23 | BenchBros | FX-8320 ( 6650.00 MHz) | |link 3DMark03 | Deneb | 189887.000 | 2009-12-20 | SF3D | Phenom II X4 965 BE ( 6542.00 MHz) | Crosshair III Formula |link 3DMark05 | Deneb | 49940.000 | 2009-12-20 | SF3D | Phenom II X4 965 BE ( 6542.00 MHz) | Crosshair III Formula |link 3DMark06 | Deneb | 38180.000 | 2010-02-14 | Gyrock | Phenom II X4 965 BE ( 6400.50 MHz) | GA-790FXTA-UD5 |link 3DMark11 - Performance | Zambezi | 20057.000 | 2011-12-30 | Xtreme Addict | FX-8150 ( 6800.00 MHz) | |link 3DMark2001 SE | Deneb | 116551.000 | 2014-03-31 | Stelaras | Phenom II X4 965 BE ( 6520.00 MHz) | |link Aquamark | Vishera | 416127.000 | 2013-12-18 | der8auer | FX-8350 ( 5100.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula |link Catzilla - 1440p | Vishera | 23280.000 | 2015-12-25 | Lio40 | FX-8350 ( 5016.73 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula |link Catzilla - 720p | Vishera | 38238.000 | 2015-07-07 | TheCancer | FX-9590 ( 5015.00 MHz) | Crosshair V Formula-Z |link Unigine Heaven - Xtreme Preset | Vishera | 4170.002 | 2015-10-12 | Gastone | FX-8370 ( 5016.00 MHz) | Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 |link GPUPI - 1B | Vishera | 4.107 | 2015-11-06 | Sgt Bilko | FX-9590 ( 5017.00 MHz) | Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 |link [/table] SELECT app,"|", arch,"|", score,"|", d, "|[flag]",LOWER(fl),"[/flag]", ur,"|", mdl ," (",frq," MHz)","|", mbmd,"|[url=http://hwbot.org/submission/",res,"]link[/url]" FROM ( SELECT application.name app, DATE(result.date) d, cpu_core.codename AS arch, result_id AS res, result.score, country.code AS ct, user.name AS ur, cpu_model.model AS mdl, result.cpu_oc AS frq, result_data.memory_vendor AS memmfc, result_data.mem_productgroup AS memprd, result.memClock AS clk, result.memT AS tim, result_data.mbManufacturer AS mbmfc, result_data.mbModel AS mbmd, country.code fl FROM result LEFT JOIN manufacturer ON (result.mb_manufacturer_id = manufacturer.manufacturer_id) LEFT JOIN mb_model ON (result.mb_model_id = mb_model.model_id) JOIN USER USING (user_id) JOIN result_data USING (data_id) JOIN cpu_model USING (cpu_id) JOIN cpu_subfamily USING (subfamily_id) JOIN country USING (country_id) JOIN cpu_core USING (core_id) JOIN application USING (application_id) JOIN cpu_family ON (cpu_core.family_id = cpu_family.family_id) WHERE( cpu_family.manufacturer_id=100 AND cpu_subfamily.name NOT LIKE "%opteron%" AND application.lowerBetter = "N" AND application.ranking = "CPU" AND application.gl_points = "Y" AND status_id<10) ORDER BY score DESC) AS tbl GROUP BY app ORDER BY app ASC; Edited January 18, 2017 by Massman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Im ready for this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Can't tell if you've set the bar high or low Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GeorgeStorm Posted January 17, 2017 Members Share Posted January 17, 2017 Ooh I wouldn't mind a tshirt Really hoping it lives up to the hype (at least a little bit!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 17, 2017 Author Share Posted January 17, 2017 Can't tell if you've set the bar high or low Considering some of the scores on the board are from 2009, I'd say the bar is set low Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoqolatl Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 That 3DMark06 top score is wrong, best I can find is Gyrock's 38k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted January 17, 2017 Crew Share Posted January 17, 2017 It was bugged, I blocked the result. Still, Massman needs to update the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted January 17, 2017 Administrators Share Posted January 17, 2017 I wonder how a score by a guy named mastercheater can be bugged? This really surprises me a lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted January 17, 2017 Crew Share Posted January 17, 2017 Biased admin team for the win!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 I think, only max frequency will be unbeatable target for Ryzen....Impossible to get over 8000 MHz for many chips today and in future Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 Yeah, the CPU frequency is not a real target. I think we can all agree to compromise on raw frequency if the IPC is good It was bugged, I blocked the result. Still, Massman needs to update the table. Done! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastone Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 i`m in!!!!!!!!!!!Wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwthat`s good news Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 I wonder how many of those scores will be beaten between now and Ryzen release That's a more interesting angle to pass the time No PR victory in "our latest CPUs have just beaten a 6-year old score! Go us!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 31, 2017 Author Share Posted January 31, 2017 We'll put up an article on launch day with the records or global first places (if there are any) as well as the table above. Should we be so blatant and also include the percentage increase? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/asus_has_announced_their_crosshair_vi_hero_am4_motherboard/1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug2507 Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Wonder if they'll do an AMD Apex.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 I think not... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Competition is going to be fierce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug2507 Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Fingers crossed, be about time for both Intel and nv. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Fingers crossed, be about time for both Intel and nv. On the Global side of WR's? Not going to happen at least not initially. my 2c. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug2507 Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Yeah, my money is with intel. I just can't see vega being 4c king. Same with vega, might be promoted as competitor to 1080 but what happens when Ti comes out. Interesting times either way, especially if dx12 starts to mature and devs start coding for more than 4c. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 3, 2017 Crew Share Posted February 3, 2017 Welcome back master Chewbacca. At least it will be something totally new to play with...and perf/price might be amasing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 (edited) My money is on reality. Nice to be back in my own capacity versus puppet capacity Dre will be played by msimax Edited February 3, 2017 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted February 4, 2017 Share Posted February 4, 2017 battle of AMD giants will begin (Chew, Stilt, Infra and hope few Intel OC guys join in also) there are some unconfirmed informations (Im a bit spectic about this 6c/12t variants and top 8c/16t clocks) Entire AMD Ryzen AM4 Processor Lineup Leaked - R7 1800X Flagship Detailed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted February 8, 2017 Crew Share Posted February 8, 2017 Anyone know if that leaked naming scheme is correct? Just would like to know having the db ready on release day. German magazine says they are fake: https://www.computerbase.de/2017-02/ryzen-lineup-fake/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.