Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 729
  • Views 221.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Kenny might be up to it...   best cedarmills were 5625-5628B best B2 conroes were L629-632 best G0 conroes were L724-730 best E0 wolfdales were Q820-828A best A0 gulftowns were 3928-3929C among

  • Intel seem to be crippling chips - I tried three 3450s and three 3550s in search of good IMC - none could do past 1100. Also tried sixteen 3570K - twelve 3218C090 and four 3219B503 - none POST at 5GH

  • 3570K L206B680 3000+     3770K 3218B957 2933+  

  • Author

Apparently something called "Near Threshold Voltage & Temp"-Theory. As far as I know, HKEPC is going to do an article about it. I hope so ... just videos are not very explanatory :P

has all the best hardware, but not a f@cking sharp video capable camera LOL

 

by the way those half a second validations not really equal to " working at 6.xx ghz " but really looking forward to that in depth arcticle ..

Edited by subaruwrc

Batch L246C294 malay

1.28V 5G 32M

1.45V 5.9G 1M

1.78V 6.86G 1M and R.I.P.

 

No Cb no Cbb.

 

D@mn.

has all the best hardware, but not a f@cking sharp video capable camera LOL

 

Reminds me of those arabs filming their cruise in million dollar cars with a Nokia 3310.

Batch L247B677 Malay / i5-3570K

4.5GHz - 1,085v

4,8GHz - 1,225v

5,0GHz - 1,415v

Edited by GGI78

How many people are still binning/testing newer Ivy?

 

There's a 3311A Costa Rica chip on Ebay for example :)

I expect chips will be....one year old? (this will go OT if the convo continues)

  • Crew

i got this.................... my eyes exploded

 

NEW BEST BATCH

 

same as

 

i7 3770K/Batch: 3251B562

5GHz@1,190V

 

3251b562 costa rica

 

1.13v 5ghz air 32m

JHkul92.jpg

 

 

1.464v 5.5ghz air 32m

LjXHbXD.jpg

 

 

bad times are due to broken single channel mpower

Edited by Vivi

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...