July 26, 201212 yr I'm really amused by how hardmods are considered 'the alternative' nowadays Well, we now can see that whole world is going in wrong direction if hardmode is something "wow" for ppl.
July 26, 201212 yr I'm really amused by how hardmods are considered 'the alternative' nowadays they are when the voltage controllers are nda lol I told you guys that MSI would not let you down...It will be ready soon be patient Edited July 26, 201212 yr by Splave
July 26, 201212 yr they are when the voltage controllers are nda lol I told you guys that MSI would not let you down...It will be ready soon be patient Photoshop level +700 :D
July 27, 201212 yr not saying, just showing:) your level of awesome sauce never fails to deliver Splave, you rock dude! I think I just might have to pick up a GTX 680 Lightning. . .
July 27, 201212 yr Well, just received an extreme ab too and it works just fine with voltage adjustments
July 29, 201212 yr @Splave+549 to clock = 1555 Mhz ... is useless to 3DMark11. Need + 1200 Agree If I'm not mistaken, the default LN2 base GPU clock is 1Ghz, and the boost GPU clock around 1200Mhz. So an offset clock setting of +549 would give us approx. 1550Mhz Base GPU clock, and around 1750Mhz GPU Boost clock. (CMIIW though) *Still waiting for my ABX X_X *
July 29, 201212 yr *Still waiting for my ABX X_X * i got in contact with the right people at MSI.. now its time watch the inbox
July 29, 201212 yr Amazing. You had your first ever GPU LN2 session a week ago and you might have access to extreme AB faster than some of the Pros.
July 29, 201212 yr AB Extreme can go to 1555, and is fact. Is not enough to beat HD 7970 in 3DMark11...
July 29, 201212 yr AB Extreme can go to 1555, and is fact.Is not enough to beat HD 7970 in 3DMark11... your math is wrong my friend, 1200 is default clock 1250 is default boost clock +550 is higher then 1555 and perhaps another program can set clocks higher This is just beta software to iron the kinks out... Edited July 29, 201212 yr by Splave
July 29, 201212 yr This is just beta software to iron the kinks out... I have a pretty good iron if you need some help getting rid of those kinks just saying
July 29, 201212 yr Some of you may not have noticed that when you compare the clocks on stock vs ln2 bios, the ln2 one gets higher scores on lower clocks, meaning it doesn't clock back where the stock bios does, and also other vendor's card's. All to do with the unlocked protections etc. [EDIT] Here are 2 screenshots for comparison. CPU is running @ 4.8GHz in both screenshots. Stock bios: http://i.imgur.com/nEU1u.png LN2 bios: http://i.imgur.com/WLPle.png Edited July 30, 201212 yr by rsnubje
July 30, 201212 yr Fact, but it's not gonna make up the speeds. Never seen any driver close up a gap of 100MHz.
July 30, 201212 yr It does, but not with these drivers so far i've seen, tested enough cards with them for now
August 1, 201212 yr It does, but not with these drivers so far i've seen, tested enough cards with them for now You can do the same clock with the ln2 bios and normal bios?? probaly not
August 2, 201212 yr No, the LN2 bios doesn't run on the clocks I can get on the standard bios. The 2 screenshots I posted are max of both biosses.
August 2, 201212 yr Some of you may not have noticed that when you compare the clocks on stock vs ln2 bios, the ln2 one gets higher scores on lower clocks, meaning it doesn't clock back where the stock bios does, and also other vendor's card's. All to do with the unlocked protections etc. [EDIT] Here are 2 screenshots for comparison. CPU is running @ 4.8GHz in both screenshots. Stock bios: http://i.imgur.com/nEU1u.png LN2 bios: http://i.imgur.com/WLPle.png this comparison is no good dude. You can't compare drivers or bios with the memory @ 1066 vs LN2 @ 1200 use the same system settings for both tests and then see if the boost is that big.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.