Should be ok in the last build (also named 1.61.2)

 

Went and did a new download...

Still no good . Tried both the .exe & the zip version

 

will forward to cpuid then but...

Maybe it would be a good idea to keep the old API for CPU-Z meanwhile and work on the Windows 8 version seperatly? In case it can't work as good as the old solution (for whatever reason) it would be worth considering providing different CPU-Z versions in general, too.

 

I don't see a good reason for risking the reliability - which Franck has built up for years - for a non-final OS, which will be released at the end of the year (and isn't built for PCs in the first way) and will not overcome the spreading of all released and working OSes people use today productively in the foreseeable future, CPU-Z runs (almost ) perfectly fine on.

Edited July 19, 201212 yr by Hyperhorn

+1. Drivers for example are OS dependant, you don't run the same exe for xp32bit and win 7. Wouldn't be a problem if you have to use one version for anything up to win 7 and another one for win 8.

Agreed, Couldn't he (Franck) allow the last working version to remain able to validate until he is able to work out all the bugs in this latest version?

Just another example, not as bad as the others I posted but lets face it, here at Bot every mhz counts

 

He said he can't

 

Andd there are tons of Win8 results on the database already

Same Problem as Mr. Paco, with K10 and DDR2 mobo... 1.60 works though...

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us I can't submit score because this error:/ 1.58 ok, but 1.61.1/2 error...

If you are submitting anything other than CPU Frequency, mem frequency, reference clock results... you can just use an old working version of CPUz for the screenshots. CPUz being broken in new versions really only impacts CPUz validations, which are only required for those benches.

 

Just thought I'd mention this, as it seems maybe some people are worried about CPUz functionality for subs other than those.

CPU-Z has officially reached HWBOT's FUBAR status...

looks, my 1.60 x64 and win7 working good and I want not change it until will be fixed

If you are submitting anything other than CPU Frequency, mem frequency, reference clock results... you can just use an old working version of CPUz for the screenshots. CPUz being broken in new versions really only impacts CPUz validations, which are only required for those benches.

 

Just thought I'd mention this, as it seems maybe some people are worried about CPUz functionality for subs other than those.

Thanx for the info I.M.O.G, good to know...

Only sad part is that in the current TEAM CUP they have the MEMORY CLOCK portion

1.61.3 is out

 

Download at CPUID

thx. i hope most of the bugs are gone now.

Ok Works. Now reads my K10 fine. Thanx

Now to see about my other platforms

the new version of cpu-z doesn´t work on DFI LANPARTY DK 790FXB: old version give right values, the new version (new downloaded) just gives trash values -.-

for exsample: cpu-z 1.58: 564 mhz for ram, same time cpu-z 1.61: 176 mhz (both tabs open same time) Oô

cpu-clock, fsb, ram,... all values are wrong.

installed severel times including one new download if the first one was damaged...

Seems like it's giving the wrong results with an i3 2120.

Memory is at 2133, cpu-z reports 1133.

I made a validation for team cup with 1.61.1.

 

Is there any way I can get it validated? Do I have to email Franck?

http://hwbot.org/newsflash/1766_cpu_z_1.61__bugs_

 

http://www.cpuid.com/news/55-cpu_z_1_61_bugs.html

We did it, thanks Franck

 

Fixed Memory Frequency (Ratio) Reading by CPU-Z on Intel i815 / Socket PGA370

 

Enjoy valid old school kickass SDRAM memory overclocking on PGA370

 

Download the CPU-Zx32s370 version at Ocaholic

 

All Multiplier are working well now, tested and approved.

66:100

100:100

133:133

133:100

 

Just to show you it's working:

 

 

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2473966

Edited August 14, 201212 yr by Christian Ney

so saw this upon opening up cpuz

 

 

it corrected itself shortly (within a few seconds) however it is reproducible with a reboot.

Heard about this one on ivy bridge yeah, this reminds me I didn't forward it to cpuid. Will do so.

Edited August 26, 201212 yr by Christian Ney

eard about this one on ivy bridge yeah, this reminds me I didn't forward it to cpuid. Will do so.

 

Thank you Christian, what is weird is I have some screens where the bclk decreases by 20mhz, very odd as well but much harder to reproduce, usually when bclk is 99.8 or less.

Bug with latest cpuz, changed fsb with clockgen but didnt update it in cpuz. 1.58 still works...