poparamiro Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) They have no respect for themselves and for all honest overclockers. HWbot is on huge wrong direction, nothing is done. When russians get ban there was one set of rules, when hkepc member get one month ban there are other rules, they changed. That is shit. Edited October 9, 2012 by poparamiro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gappo Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 *sigh* im fairly certain hwbot staff does not get paid enough for this bs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Not again..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 *sigh* im fairly certain hwbot staff does not get paid enough for this bs. Still waiting for the money on the bank account, there are several people at the staff we need to split the money you know, it takes time. And Massman wants 50 % for himself dat b* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subaruwrc Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 why im not playing lottery... another PRO oc'er from nowhere, Again HKPEC, again cheating. isn't it booring for you guys ? ( from the team itself ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew pro Posted October 9, 2012 Crew Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) Hahaha that's so funny, I've bitten my tongue long enough I guess when John Lam said on Facebook he's teaching Edison to tweak 01 he wasn't joking, oh it was probably ms ram drive that no overclocker can compile right, I did compile it and ran pifast 100 times and never saw any desktop screenshots half cut off you couldn't tweak a nipple, no one believes that shit Edited October 9, 2012 by pro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gappo Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 bunnying nipple tweak made me squirt coke out my nose man lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 bunnying nipple tweak made me squirt coke corrected! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew pro Posted October 9, 2012 Crew Share Posted October 9, 2012 OK this is fucking bullshit, stop it already!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d4rkr4in Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 what ^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeepBeep2 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 349 point discrepancy you say fester? 376 point advantage over Team.AU? Seems here the HKEPC guys forgot to do math this time...because surely ~15-25 points over Team.AU without cheating was enough for them, or they were afraid of backups? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 one more http://hwbot.org/submission/2319361 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest battlecryawesome Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) Edited October 10, 2012 by battlecryawesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 (edited) one more http://hwbot.org/submission/2319361 Searching Compression Signatures: (3347 built-in, 0 user(*) ) EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match? ------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- -------------- CAM:[sONY ] [CYBERSHOT U ] [ ] Yes SW :[Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ] [save As 07 ] SW :[Apple Quicktime ] [0466-0467 ] SW :[Digital Photo Professiona] [05 ] SW :[iJG Library ] [075 ] SW :[MS Paint ] [ ] SW :[MS Visio ] [ ] SW :[ZoomBrowser EX ] [low ] The following IJG-based editors also match this signature: SW :[GIMP ] [075 ] SW :[irfanView ] [075 ] SW :[idImager ] [075 ] SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [075 ] SW :[NeatImage ] [075 ] SW :[Paint.NET ] [075 ] SW :[Photomatix ] [075 ] SW :[XnView ] [075 ] just for reference.... against one of MY OWN submissions. fyi only paint was used to paste in and create the image... you know the regular print screen open paint paste save Searching Compression Signatures: (3347 built-in, 0 user(*) ) EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match? ------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- -------------- CAM:[PENTAX ] [PENTAX Optio 550 ] [ ] No SW :[Apple ImageIO.framework ] [049 ] SW :[iJG Library ] [079 ] The following IJG-based editors also match this signature: SW :[GIMP ] [079 ] SW :[irfanView ] [079 ] SW :[idImager ] [079 ] SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [079 ] SW :[NeatImage ] [079 ] SW :[Paint.NET ] [079 ] SW :[Photomatix ] [079 ] SW :[XnView ] [079 ] now lets compare the screen shot from edison.chan vs the one Dino pointed out... EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match? ------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- -------------- CAM:[sONY ] [CYBERSHOT U ] [ ] Yes SW :[Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ] [save As 07 ] SW :[Apple Quicktime ] [0466-0467 ] SW :[Digital Photo Professiona] [05 ] SW :[iJG Library ] [075 ] SW :[MS Paint ] [ ] SW :[MS Visio ] [ ] SW :[ZoomBrowser EX ] [low ] The following IJG-based editors also match this signature: SW :[GIMP ] [075 ] SW :[irfanView ] [075 ] SW :[idImager ] [075 ] SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [075 ] SW :[NeatImage ] [075 ] SW :[Paint.NET ] [075 ] SW :[Photomatix ] [075 ] SW :[XnView ] [075 ] Searching Compression Signatures: (3347 built-in, 0 user(*) ) EXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match? ------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------- -------------- CAM:[sONY ] [CYBERSHOT U ] [ ] Yes SW :[Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ] [save As 07 ] SW :[Apple Quicktime ] [0466-0467 ] SW :[Digital Photo Professiona] [05 ] SW :[iJG Library ] [075 ] SW :[MS Paint ] [ ] SW :[MS Visio ] [ ] SW :[ZoomBrowser EX ] [low ] The following IJG-based editors also match this signature: SW :[GIMP ] [075 ] SW :[irfanView ] [075 ] SW :[idImager ] [075 ] SW :[FastStone Image Viewer ] [075 ] SW :[NeatImage ] [075 ] SW :[Paint.NET ] [075 ] SW :[Photomatix ] [075 ] SW :[XnView ] [075 ] Based on the analysis of compression characteristics and EXIF metadata: ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed/edited amazingly, it seems to come from the same system! Edited October 10, 2012 by zeneffect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XtremeCuztoms Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Man, go to work for the day and come home and see I'm missing all the fun.. Me wants this board Now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Think hwbot must offer some snacks and drinks and a lot of popcorn thought. This is better than an crime on TV, lol... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 massman where are you missing all the fun dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeepBeep2 Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 i noticed that too splave lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 massman where are you missing all the fun dude Just returned from the 'ban user'-page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Just returned from the 'ban user'-page. for how long? 1 month? 1 year? forever? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.