Splave Posted April 15, 2013 Posted April 15, 2013 6.7ghz ftw! so about 7.1 - 7.2 ish ivy speed 32m/PF I hope Quote
stasio Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 200 BCLK ftw Btw, CPU-Z 1.64 display CPU VRM voltage,instead of CPU Vcore. Quote
xxbassplayerxx Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 For some reason BCLK close to 200 just seems right... 1366 days Quote
Massman Posted May 12, 2013 Author Posted May 12, 2013 Wonder who'll get the 2.5x gear ratio working Quote
Massman Posted May 12, 2013 Author Posted May 12, 2013 That's because the CPUs were just not capable of running anything near that . Maybe they are now ... not sure about this, actually. Quote
Massman Posted May 12, 2013 Author Posted May 12, 2013 The CPUs were just not capable of doing much more than 170MHz BCLK. To fully use the 2.5x ratio, you'd need to use a BCLK of 68MHz with 2.5x gear ratio. Anything below 95MHz BCLK on SB-E was already a struggle. Quote
sin0822 Posted May 13, 2013 Posted May 13, 2013 yea but you thin you can run the PCI-E less than 90mhz? Quote
sin0822 Posted May 13, 2013 Posted May 13, 2013 but can the PCi-E bus itself not the CPU, i am talking about the GPU go below? Maybe, idk. I have one GPu i used to do that 117mh BCLK, so i guess you can go the other direction, but i always felt it could go up more than down. Quote
Hyperhorn Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 (edited) Any new thoughts about "is L3 cache running at core or ring frequency" thing? What would you guys think if core AND ring frequency boost L3 cache performance at a 2/3 (core) and 1/3 (ring) relationship? Wouldn't it be a nice idea that L3-cache runs at core frequency and ringbus only boosts the interface between the cores and the L3-cache? Given L3-cache and ring share one clock domain in fact and run at the same frequency - for what reasons would the core frequency affect synthetic L3 performance values much more than the ring frequency or e. g. CPU NB clock frequency of AMD CPUs? Edited May 23, 2013 by Hyperhorn Quote
Massman Posted May 23, 2013 Author Posted May 23, 2013 If I recall the IDF presentation correctly, the Intel engineers mentioned that "even though the Ring Bus frequency can be adjusted, they have not seen major performance gains in the labs". And then they asked the reviewers and power users to test it themselves Quote
Alex@ro Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 Aside from superpi and couple of 2d benchmarks+2001,gains are not so big as you'd expect to,pretty much below 5%.... Quote
chomuco Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 http://gyazo.com/ec6cda84bda05f8daf0f38dd9f261c6e.png Quote
basco Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 can someone plz advise me how to play with rtl-settings on maximus? if i change one setting one step up or down i get 55 no matter what volts.... i get non consistent rtl=changes after reboots on auto and i think this is only setting effecting 3d11mark pysx score.(maybe interesting for massman in x79 pysx). thanks in advance Quote
Xtreme Addict Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 lower bclk for instance to 98,6 mhz and try to boot, you have to pass memory training first before going full mhz Quote
TerraRaptor Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 Bascom my way to adjust RTLs @M6E is as follows: 1. Set all RTLs & RTL-IOs to desired values iat the same time. (eg. 39/39/40/40 4/4/4/4 - do not change only one parameter). 2. Start adjusting RTL initial value in small steps from 63 to smth like 40 (63, 61, 59 etc) trying to post/train with a given RTL initial value. For my PSC kit @2600 I was able to adjust rtls from 42/42/47/45 4/4/9/7 to 41/41/42/42 4/4/4/4 with RTL initial value of 44. I beleive RTL initial value is a key for successful post. Quote
basco Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 (edited) thx very much xtreme addict. its better then before now,but i am still not able to put values manuell. best score i get is with 39\40\40\41 and this is only sometimes after boots if i am lucky only rtl initial value i can do manuell. does more ramvolt help you with lower rtl?-me is not getting lower values. thx terraraptor-will try and report. ex:my last 3 boots on rtl-auto:39\39\40\41 ; 39\39\40\40 : 39\40\41\40 my sys:max6gene 1002-17600cl7 pi-1:9 2424mhz cl8-11-8 Edited December 6, 2013 by basco Quote
basco Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 thanks a lot Terraraptor & Xtremeaddict with your help i can finally boot with manuell rtl. 2424mhz rtlinit-44 \\ 39\39\40\40 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.