Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

First Haswell Valids

Christian Ney
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

xxbassplayerxx
xxbassplayerxx

It's MSI. They're the only ones still doing POSCaps around the socket these days. They also do the white lines coming out from the socket and you can see the top of the chokes is blurred since they ha

sin0822
sin0822

it was optional for Z77, so manufacturers could do it or not, but it was introduced too close to launch. I do think asus optimized it more of course, however it has its own downfalls as it isn't perfe

Christian Ney Newbie

Christian Ney

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Oh I thought there was a way to hide them after you published online but I guess not.

 

Yes there is a way if you submited using your email then it is listed under your account. You just have to login and then hide the sub (located on the right of the sub).

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted

Haters gonna hate? Haswell at 8GHz video.

 

Imho, this kind of hints to the idea that the 7GHz validation might be bogus or bugged too. I think CPU-Z V1.62 just wasn't able to correctly read out the frequency and voltages. Especially the 91MHz BCLK seems a bit suspicious.

 

dinos22 Contributor

dinos22

Posted
Posted
Haters gonna hate? Haswell at 8GHz video.

 

Imho, this kind of hints to the idea that the 7GHz validation might be bogus or bugged too. I think CPU-Z V1.62 just wasn't able to correctly read out the frequency and voltages. Especially the 91MHz BCLK seems a bit suspicious.

 

 

lol just saw that on FB

 

is that the same guy that was doing this last time lol. no doubt he was on air cooling also

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted
Actually, is not helping overclocking community in general.

 

Intel will protect their unreleased products and market standing from uncertainty at any cost....and it will trickle down to the bottom of chain.

 

Not really. Leaks have been happening for ages and it never prevented people (in general) from getting early access and sampling. I think as long as Intel has the obvious performance upper-hand, they don't really care that much about leaks.

 

If a company really wants to prevent leaks, they are able to enforce it. Just look at Nvidia and Apple for example.

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted
Its your call, do what you think is the best for your site

 

So far, it seems most community members are okay with this thread?

 

FYI// that video is a 100% FAKE!

dumo Enthusiast

dumo

Posted
Posted
It's not that simple for Intel like it is for Nvidia or Apple.
Yep, those analysts and stock shorters will have a field day with 4770K @ 2.56V ss. Lol
CL3P20 Enthusiast

CL3P20

Posted
Posted

Any add banners get pulled or you guys just focusing on ripping apart the only big manufacturer that doesn't pay for a banner at this point? ..some edits flying around already after the phone calls..

 

*the shenanigans never cease to amaze me.

hokiealumnus Newbie

hokiealumnus

Posted
Posted
Hey Community,

 

Should I remove this post? I'm torn between being an "Assman" for having the leaks in a thread or being an "Assman" for censorship if I take the thread down.

 

Regards,

 

A torn Pieter.

 

When it disappeared the first time I thought nothing of it and assumed it was pulled for all the right reasons. It was actually its re-appearance that gave me pause.

 

It doesn't really bother me per se', because I can link to this without breaking my own NDA. That said, I also feel for the guys who probably did not intend to have this out there in front of everyone at this early stage. It wouldn't make me cry at all to have the thread removed.

 

Put it this way, if it were my valid, I'd ask very nicely if the evidence of it could be hidden from the public until launch and would have asked yesterday when this originally appeared. This thing has been up over 24 hours now though, so the damage is pretty much done, no? Surely the two screenshots are elsewhere by now. I didn't save them, just linked here; but others may have gone that extra step.

 

It's a difficult decision. After thinking about it, were I A torn Pieter, I'd reach out to Andre & Nick and ask what they would like me to do.

Splave Mentor

Splave

Posted
Posted
Any add banners get pulled or you guys just focusing on ripping apart the only big manufacturer that doesn't pay for a banner at this point? ..some edits flying around already after the phone calls..

 

*the shenanigans never cease to amaze me.

 

you in deep shit man?

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted
Any add banners get pulled or you guys just focusing on ripping apart the only big manufacturer that doesn't pay for a banner at this point? ..some edits flying around already after the phone calls..

 

*the shenanigans never cease to amaze me.

 

Of course no banners are being pulled.

 

Also no phone calls and no emails from a single vendor. Our partnerships have very little to do with this. After all, there were Asus, Asrock and MSI results in the thread. Oh, and Intel obviously. HWBOT didn't "leak" anything, the source is OCAholic and its source is from the public CPU-Z database entries.

 

I removed yours after a phone call from MSI HQ. This phone call was unrelated to your score being posted on the internet, but I made the suggestion that I could down the picture from this forum thread if they wanted that. I would have done the same if you had sent me a private message, just like I have taken down pictures upon request from Gigabyte and ASUS in the past. The five second phone conversation I had was calm and nothing was said in terms of banners, partnerships or anything else. I just explained the situation and what the options were.

 

Perhaps you should be a bit more respectful towards the staff here. After all, you are the one that accidentally published that validation online. The result was public. A simple private message would have sufficed. Sadly enough, instead of a polite message you're throwing bad words and accusations around.

 

You had a little "oops" and sometimes that happens.

Bobnova Newbie

Bobnova

Posted
Posted

I fail to see how it's Massman's fault that people put NDA CPUz validations in a public database.

I'd say it's the fault of those who put the validations in there. Everybody knows people troll through said database looking for such things before a launch, don't they?

CL3P20 Enthusiast

CL3P20

Posted
Posted

Every one can see the leak is a secondary action. I singled out no one in my comments, nor have I placed any blame. I have nothing to hide *pun*. @ MM - I'm certain your phone calls had nothing to do with me..who am I that MSI would be contacting you..on ..what, my behalf, influence, suggestion? Its a flattering idea..surely you jest. I think there was more 'speaking for others' than there were any direct discussions. I replied via email to an initial 'wtf!?' I found in my inbox.. but things have been quiet since. I was just being an ass in my posts because I was still a bit sour over it.. or the 'principle' or being ratted out by fellow members of the community - intentional or not. Piss on my boots then apologize..dont worry, I'll still let you but me a beer some time.

 

*so.. how bout that 32mil?

  • Crew
Antinomy Rising Star

Antinomy

Posted
  • Crew
Posted

Why do you think it's only two of em?

http://occlub.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=3064 - here's a guy who has found several Haswell subs, as well as Radeon 8970 and stuff like Ivy-E.

 

They have some sort of problems with the forum, so here's a copy (not up-to-date though): http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&hs=74t&rls=org.mozilla%3Aru%3Aofficial&sclient=psy-ab&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Focclub.ru%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D3064&oq=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Focclub.ru%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D3064&gs_l=serp.3...65107.66308.0.66667.6.6.0.0.0.3.215.924.0j4j1.5.0...0.1...1c.1.12.psy-ab.kjYXMFORdTA&pbx=1

Christian Ney Newbie

Christian Ney

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Yes turned out they were from there (guy who sent me the first ss didn't tell me he didn't find them by himself in the first place, we thought he was the finder). Then I refound the same valids and new ones by myself (coming soon, now ID+name is blurred).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...