May 4, 201312 yr Author Not for the other ones I found, anyway the manufacturer know how to know who submited
May 4, 201312 yr Maybe the right place to mention this, maybe not. If ES are better than retail, HWB better make sure the ES rules are highlighted AND ENFORCED. They have NOT been properly enforced for the best part of a year. I don't know what the ES rules are now that the Pro Cup is here. EDIT: just checked. They are out of date and there is (I think) a word missing that completely changes what is allowed. Edited May 4, 201312 yr by K404
May 5, 201312 yr We don't check every incoming submission, Kenny. Please report any ES violating results so the moderating staff can take care of them. This thread has sparked an interesting discussion. Leaks are okay as long as the source of the leak is not mentioned or highlighted?
May 6, 201312 yr Crew Leaks are okay as long as the source of the leak is not mentioned or highlighted?Did someone say "Piednoel"?
May 6, 201312 yr We're all interested in leaks, we just don't like our own guys getting thrown under the bus--especially when the leak was wholly accidental.
May 6, 201312 yr Let's all pinky swear to spread leaks as fast and viral as possible, but never to screw over a fellow community member?
May 6, 201312 yr Let's all pinky swear to spread leaks as fast and viral as possible, but never to screw over a fellow community member? It would be nice...
May 6, 201312 yr How to prevent people from getting screwed over, though? The nickname is only one aspect of the whole leak thing. Obviously, having the mainboard vendor in those validations will lead to the (accidental) leaker too. Any guidelines you guys can come up with? If yes, that would be great!
May 6, 201312 yr Why put a name on something that carries the risk of being seen in public when it shouldn't be?
May 6, 201312 yr Any guidelines you guys can come up with? If yes, that would be great!Get a CPUz/canardpc account and keep the results unpublished.People can still see the .png (if they do the manual dump and check screenshots one by one) but they will not know the name/board/mem (=details) until it's published.
May 7, 201312 yr I saw if you are to leak it, then at least cover the name if its a real name of someone you know! Just out of respect. BTW there are going to be rules on what version of CPUz is required for validations for haswell, correct? Or will CPuZ take care of that themselves?
May 7, 201312 yr Watching from my phone and not seeing anything too obviously wrong with it that might not just be a result of unsupported CPU-Z.
May 8, 201312 yr Author The most obvious one can see at first sight is the cache info that are wrong for exemple.
May 8, 201312 yr yea its hard for me to see as well but I don't know what to look for in a fake score really. I guess that is a good thing since I could prob never fake a score. lol You guys really have sharp eyes.
May 11, 201312 yr According to AIDA64,CPU-Z 1.64 display CPU VRM voltage instead CPU Vcore. http://www.chinadiy.com.cn/batch.download.php?aid=67878 New Intel Core i7 4770k "Review" : http://translate.google.co.ve/translate?sl=zh-CN&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=es&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinadiy.com.cn%2Fhtml%2F24%2Fn-9024.html
May 11, 201312 yr depends on motherboard,from those screenshots it seems to me that mobo is either msi or biostar.?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.