Christian Ney Posted May 4, 2013 Author Posted May 4, 2013 Not for the other ones I found, anyway the manufacturer know how to know who submited Quote
K404 Posted May 4, 2013 Posted May 4, 2013 (edited) Maybe the right place to mention this, maybe not. If ES are better than retail, HWB better make sure the ES rules are highlighted AND ENFORCED. They have NOT been properly enforced for the best part of a year. I don't know what the ES rules are now that the Pro Cup is here. EDIT: just checked. They are out of date and there is (I think) a word missing that completely changes what is allowed. Edited May 4, 2013 by K404 Quote
Massman Posted May 5, 2013 Posted May 5, 2013 We don't check every incoming submission, Kenny. Please report any ES violating results so the moderating staff can take care of them. This thread has sparked an interesting discussion. Leaks are okay as long as the source of the leak is not mentioned or highlighted? Quote
Crew Antinomy Posted May 6, 2013 Crew Posted May 6, 2013 Leaks are okay as long as the source of the leak is not mentioned or highlighted?Did someone say "Piednoel"? Quote
xxbassplayerxx Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 We're all interested in leaks, we just don't like our own guys getting thrown under the bus--especially when the leak was wholly accidental. Quote
Massman Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 Let's all pinky swear to spread leaks as fast and viral as possible, but never to screw over a fellow community member? Quote
xxbassplayerxx Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 Let's all pinky swear to spread leaks as fast and viral as possible, but never to screw over a fellow community member? It would be nice... Quote
Massman Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 How to prevent people from getting screwed over, though? The nickname is only one aspect of the whole leak thing. Obviously, having the mainboard vendor in those validations will lead to the (accidental) leaker too. Any guidelines you guys can come up with? If yes, that would be great! Quote
Splave Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 write someone you dont like as the username, boom problem solved Quote
K404 Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 Why put a name on something that carries the risk of being seen in public when it shouldn't be? Quote
TaPaKaH Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 Any guidelines you guys can come up with? If yes, that would be great!Get a CPUz/canardpc account and keep the results unpublished.People can still see the .png (if they do the manual dump and check screenshots one by one) but they will not know the name/board/mem (=details) until it's published. Quote
sin0822 Posted May 7, 2013 Posted May 7, 2013 I saw if you are to leak it, then at least cover the name if its a real name of someone you know! Just out of respect. BTW there are going to be rules on what version of CPUz is required for validations for haswell, correct? Or will CPuZ take care of that themselves? Quote
Christian Ney Posted May 7, 2013 Author Posted May 7, 2013 Look closer lol There are some pretty obvious stuff. Quote
GENiEBEN Posted May 7, 2013 Posted May 7, 2013 Video actually looks pretty legit! You want me to make you a 9GHz video Thomas? Quote
xxbassplayerxx Posted May 7, 2013 Posted May 7, 2013 Watching from my phone and not seeing anything too obviously wrong with it that might not just be a result of unsupported CPU-Z. Quote
xxbassplayerxx Posted May 8, 2013 Posted May 8, 2013 Dammit... Just watched it closer. What am I missing? Quote
Christian Ney Posted May 8, 2013 Author Posted May 8, 2013 The most obvious one can see at first sight is the cache info that are wrong for exemple. Quote
sin0822 Posted May 8, 2013 Posted May 8, 2013 yea its hard for me to see as well but I don't know what to look for in a fake score really. I guess that is a good thing since I could prob never fake a score. lol You guys really have sharp eyes. Quote
dinos22 Posted May 8, 2013 Posted May 8, 2013 compare numbers steve and you will find it straight up LOL Quote
stasio Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 According to AIDA64,CPU-Z 1.64 display CPU VRM voltage instead CPU Vcore. http://www.chinadiy.com.cn/batch.download.php?aid=67878 New Intel Core i7 4770k "Review" : http://translate.google.co.ve/translate?sl=zh-CN&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=es&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chinadiy.com.cn%2Fhtml%2F24%2Fn-9024.html Quote
Alex@ro Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 depends on motherboard,from those screenshots it seems to me that mobo is either msi or biostar.? Quote
marmott Posted May 11, 2013 Posted May 11, 2013 looks like Asus with the T-Topology writing on the PCB Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.