Submission & member moderation

I had a submission flagged/reported by another user for my HWBot x265 score. The reason was for suspected cheating with HPET Timer disabled, my score is within the 5% tolerance and but does not have the HPET Timer active. My question is: Does HPET have to be enabled for the benchmark with Windows 7 or can I use the default TSC+ACPI timer? I don't think this should be an issue with Windows 7 but the documentation on this benchmark with respect to the timers is limited It says only Windows 8/8.1/10 requires it but I would still like a definitive answer.

Hello my friends, my new there i chose to post on off topic, i have a big question , for the most benchs i use win 8.1 cuz i cant reinstall any othwr windows on my daly use pc and oc rig. ..i can use win 8? Or is realy realy inportant to have win 7?..thanks in advice

what's verification missing in this score? http://hwbot.org/submission/2972648_pipes_xtu_core_i7_5960x_2297_marks

Hi. I dont know if here is the right area, but... I noticed the HWBOT Prime is sumitting the score of Zenfone 2 4GB to wrong SoC. There is two big variables of ZF2: ZM551ML: Atom Z3580 @2.33GHz, 4GB LPDDR3 ZM550ML: Atom Z3560 @1.83GHz, 2GB LPDDR3 The first model is assigned to second SoC. See here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/device/4862/zenfone_2_4g_lte_tw_ze551ml_32gb I has to edit all of my submissions to assign to correct processor, but there is others submission with mismatched processors. Thanks a lot, mods.

valid run as per futuremark, but cant submit to hwbot as form tells me it needs a valid url. Is this a glitch or am i missing something?

all submission of gpu pi 1b are showing in the hardware rank. i have three submissions of gpu pi 1b and all of them are showing up instead of the best one. had the same problem for gpu pi 100m also.

On Asus TXP4-X mainboard, witch use Intel 430TX chipset, latest CPU-Z does report the FSB wrongly. A good example is my P90 running at 75x1.5 - reported as 55x2 = 110MHz: http://valid.x86.fr/ia4gwh So I "look around" to see, what others use and on the similar, Asus TXP4 mainboard held Antimony first place with 83MHz: http://hwbot.org/submission/2373822_ The 83MHz settings looks familiar, my board can do 7.14, 50, 55, 60, 66, 75 and 83MHz, so except my envy that the IDE controller made it on his board, I have nothing against that score. I looked that the FSB is correctly reported using CPU-Z v1.63 - so I grab that version on CPU-Z page (last one in history) and …

Something is wrong, all I get is a white screen when I try to make a sub.

Can someone please fix my last several submissions with 4790k. Has them catagorized as 6c instead of 4c and rankings are skewed. Thanks.

I would just like to report that the rules for Perforance test are missing: http://hwbot.org/article/application_55_rules So if someone got a bit of the time, maybe this could be fixed. The link is from there pointing to this missing page: http://hwbot.org/submit/benchmark/performance_test/

I have a first testing Aquamark score on my Jetway V600DAP: http://hwbot.org/submission/2937449_ And the score was moved under ECS mobo: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/kt600_8237/ ... Now this is wrong and I don't see, how can I edit that 1) HWbot recognize the mobo: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/v600dap/ 2) CPU-Z does not recognize the mobo: http://valid.canardpc.com/1r0xd3 ...but it is certainly NOT ECS KT600-8237 mobo, I can prove that by pictures and other info: Could some mod move this test to appropriate mainboard? (yep, there will be more to come...)

Preface: PCMark Vantage have a *VERY* large output window and what is even worser, the important information is on the right corner... Having shortage of monitors, I tried the old CRT Eizo F35 Flexscan and that gives acceptable readability only in 1024x768 output. (I used it on Amiga from 1997 and I used it in 800x600, witch is best for 15' monitor) Problem: Mr.Scott wrongly flagged my score with PCMark Vantage as "invalid", because it allegedly miss the CPU-Z screen(s?). The score in question is there: http://hwbot.org/submission/2943404_ And it is now marked as "deleted or blocked", even that it clearly (right top and bottom corner, see?) feature the CP…

Good evening everyone, I just had a nice session working on some 3x CPU scores, but when I submitted this HWbot Prime score, it defaulted to 2x for the CPU count instead of the actually active 3. I've provided my own SS in combination with the submission via the file. Both show that 3 cores are active, I'd just like to make sure it's switched to the correct category. I looked around, but I guess you can't report your own submissions. Thanks in advance! Edit: Here is the submission in question: http://hwbot.org/submission/2944898_

At 3 a.m. today I was n.10 in enthusiast league with 646.20 points. At 3.30 a.m. I fell to n.14 with 611 points. Checked my points and there is no loss anywhere. Some explanation is required please.

Sorry for the double post! I think my question pertains to this forum instead of XTU Integration forum where I originally posted: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=139066 As originally posted

Team members told me to ask over on the forums here for actual clarification.... I have an Asus P5E and after doing a few runs on the stock bios, I then did the trick a number of people do and put the Rampage Formula bios onto my motherboard in order to have more options/tweaks available when overclocking. Am I still able to submit these benches as using an Asus P5E, or do I need to follow another process since CPU-Z states that I'm now using a Rampage Formula? Additionally, does this apply to all benchmark submissions, or just reference clock? Thanks in advance.

I would like to ask the result moderators , if the following result is considered valid. http://hwbot.org/submission/2883832 From what i now , it's been reported. My main concern is about the screenshot used , which according to the benchmark rules , is not correct. http://hwbot.org/news/9037_application_50_rules/

Will a moderator please check my submissions of 18 and 19-6-2015 and see if the points earned are reflected in the Novice League Ranking point system ? I am almost certain something is definetely wrong. Thank you. George Kokovinis

Hello... i have two submition that can not edit it.... http://hwbot.org/submission/2891423_miladkherad_unigine_heaven___basic_preset_mobile_hd_graphics_4400_578.11_dx9_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2891430_miladkherad_aquamark_mobile_hd_graphics_4400_191174_marks the vga detected worng by program... it must change to intel HD 4400... Help Plz ...F1

is this submission invalid from not having a memory tab open for the screenshot. these simple mistakes suck when you have a top place submission. it would be nice to get a mulligan but im fairly sure the rules dont allow it. http://hwbot.org/submission/2730569_michel90_cinebench___r15_core_2_e6850_%283.0ghz%29_258_cb

I'm Sorry if I posted this is in the wrong section. Im not exactly where it belongs. But anyway... I have several OC submissions using XTU and most seem to score rather low, I know that its just a number, but if i use a downloaded setting you would think it would benchmark nearly the same. but thats not why im posting this. If you have any advice or maybe an Idea on why that is happening, Please let me know. The real reason that I'm here is that XTU seems to not always report correct values. If i OC via the BIOS, It doesn't show the correct values. The screenshot attached shows my BIOS settings Via CPUZ. No throttling occurred during the benchmark. The values listed i…

Hello, http://hwbot.org/submission/2854013_nilkilla_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gt_730_gddr5_70765_marks This submission was blocked for the following reason: "Hello, An HWBOT moderator, "Christian Ney", has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has marked one of your submissions as 'insufficient verification'. This was the reason the user gave: Benchmark subdetails mandatory" Yet, the subdetails are showing in my screenshot. During the competition they were submitted, there was no option to manually enter them. Please help me to understand. It's not like it will guarantee me a prize, but I was happy with this submission. Thanks, Nilkilla

i'm constantly gain new achievement every day even force recalculation hasn't fix it can you mods please fix it , is annoying thanks in advance http://hwbot.org/user/sotoss/

http://hwbot.org/submission/2871699_ this is broken. i can't change it to 1 cpu with 1 core......

it says oops something went wrong...... with geekbench3, gpuip (saved file) plz help