Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TASOS

Members
  • Posts

    1583
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by TASOS

  1. You've got an odd card. GT740 .... with 4GB of GDDR3 ??? You should contact their support (already a legacy product) rma@viewmax.us
  2. Just by looking at the database it seems that the Nvidia are no go. But the min. requirements may be different. I see 256MB vga's also... and ATI/AMD 1xxx , 2xxx and 3xxx series. Just switch to ATI-AMD ?
  3. I flashed the EBED version , on my version 2.0 , 8RDA3I Everything worked smoothly , and the board bios booted and memtested up to 240 with 2x512MB and 245 with 2x256MB I will further test , when i have more free time. Thank you.
  4. Thank you I will test your bios next weekend. Yes i already have a pre-programmed backup bios chip for this board.
  5. Anyone care to mod an Epox bios ... (or anyone already have a modded one) ? It's about the EP-8RDA3I (non Pro) ... sample photo It's the board without the Sata ports ... and has the older 256kb bios. The latest version available is the rda34729.bin (29/07/2004) rda34729.bin
  6. In Nehalem (early) era ... Micron chips ruled D9GTR , D9GTS , D9JNL I'll say that was Cellshock era too.
  7. What's that fusion core application , that keeps alarming and gets restricted by the antivirus ?
  8. Perhaps it's a spec division GF106 144/24/24 192/32/16 192/32/24 (mobile) GF116 144/24/16 192/32/16 Something like that. Anyway In 3DMark99 , most of the participants will aim for a 775 combo. AM2 Nforce chipsets are old and dont support new enough AMD cpu gen (2-cores) , that can battle with a 775 C2D. In this scenario (whatever the gpu selection) wont count that much. Yeah GTS450 was built on both GF106 and GF116.
  9. Alby In DDR2 stage 1)Two times written GF116 core is a typo or wanna add an other GF gen also ? 2)AM2 vs 775 ? ... one score each ? 3) Why leave out Nforce590 and 750 boards ?
  10. Very good score for these clocks. You got yourself a very nice card !!!
  11. 3DMark03 All tests have been compiled and linked with DirectX 9.0 libraries. However, only a small part of the benchmark requires DirectX 9 hardware. As DirectX 8 hardware is now commonly available, a major portion of tests requires DirectX 8 hardware support. A small part of the benchmark can be run with only DirectX 7 compatible hardware. Note that 3DMark03 is not appropriate for solely evaluating DirectX 7. In simple words GT1 - requires a DX7 capable vga GT2 & GT3 - require a DX8 capable vga GT4 - requires a DX9 capable vga So , geforce2 cards will only run the GT1 test to obtain a score.
  12. Over the last ... lets say several years of buying ram on Ebay , when looking for BH5 and TCCD , i had at least 10 kit , where someone had used the the original BH5 or TCCD ramsink and sticker and the pcb inside was something else. Same applies to DDR2 too , where for example buying Cellshock ram i found NANYA inside. Anyway , there will always be scams on Ebay and other places. P.S. Last post of this kind , cause we messed up the thread. Sorry.
  13. Everything is possible. We can never really know or be sure about anything. But to be honest , i give much more % in someone switching ram heatsinks to resell Corsair ram on Ebay .... than Corsair switching ram chips under the same label.
  14. That is the only result of the list , presented as Winbond and i believe it's a typo. G.skill and Corsair had and still have a certain labeling system for their ram products ... they never alter their labeling. Version X is always a specific manufacturer.
  15. Who has tested compatibility with various boards ? Is there a list ? What's the final cost of this device ?
  16. 99% of known ram modules labeled as v5.x are PROMOS. Winbond is not present in v5.x labels https://forum.corsair.com/v2/showthread.php?t=44365&t=44365
  17. 1)About the notebook thing ... i wrote above 2)Could be easier if limitation is ... everything except Asrock XXX ? 3)I got it ... it was the xeon part that got me confused Thanks
  18. I've got a bit different point of view. "Punching" a laptop board on a test bench (in my eyes) is no longer a laptop device. You can still oc a laptop (in some cases) without taking it apart. Anyway I pointed out what i wanted to say , it's not me making decisions. We can move on
  19. A couple of questions please 1) That notebook stage , will be for real notebooks ? or will include notebook zombies too ? (meaning notebook boards on test benches heavily cooled down). 2) HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 1080p - DDR SDRAM LIMITATIONS (Only use ASUS, GIGABYTE, Abit, DFI, MSI, Biostar motherboards.) Random pick of those manufacturers or we want to avoid something ? .... and this one please ( i dont get it) 3DMark06 LIMITATIONS Only use DDR3 SDRAM memory. Use 3 processor core(s) in total. Use 3 videocard core(s) in total. Xeons CPUs allowed Unlocking cores allowed, disabling not
  20. Many thanks for your effort !!! Why posted in offtopic , when there is a more proper section ? You could work something out , in co-operation
  21. If i could make a proposal That would be to rename this section to OC History instead of OC Archeology.
  22. It's always a good thing to write down OC History @Casanova
  23. You are looking for the best of the best ... but also rare items. How much are you looking to spend for these ?
  24. I'm not good at music history But they say ... they never expected a group from Texas to produce such kind of music back in '83 ?
×
×
  • Create New...