TASOS

These were the "original" Chinese wholesalers SS-PTCA-01 Shenzhen Kingsion Technology Corporation Other Socket 478 to 775 CPU Transfer Card

Nice work Christian

What kind of compound they used in these Parhelia vga's ??? Is it a compound ? or is it cement ? Never seen something similar. IT DOESNT MOVE I left it work to heat by itself ... no go I heated it with a heat gun ... nothing I've ordered a surgical thin razon , to try.

Does multi-quote function , works ok , for all forum members , in all forum sections ??? For example , i cant multi-quote here http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=167088 or here http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=165641&page=11

Yes it was a bug. Dont know what happened. I had reported it , to websmile at the round thread. Thanks

Hah ... and i thought i had the worst cpu ever , with a CB at 0C

A couple more little matters. 1)Descriptions on each stage needs editing. In some say 3DMark 2001 and in others say 3DMark 2003 ... and there is no Stage 4 for PCMark 04 , it's stage 3. And a crucial matter cause i dont like "playing" with words. Make crystal clear , that it's 478 cpu on 478 boards. I dont like to play the adapters game.

The R3 marking is nice hidden also. I wouldnt had an argue about the wallpaper as long as everyone could leave clear and visible the screen area with the marking. It can be done.

That's a good tactic I would have followed your method (if i had it as an option in my local market). Can you send me a couple of kilo's (fx55 and fx57) ?

Please dont forget , to change the wallpaper. Those R1 and R2 markings were not followed as a rule in the earlier round. I believe we need some actual more obvious change for the wallpaper. Let's eliminate every chance of someone benching earlier than others.

The trick to improve CB , they already told you here. Now , the real thing to ask these guys here , is to tell you some exact FPO/BATCH , that fly in cold.

In total , it was an interesting round Cinebench was a bit brutal , especially for the single-core cpu's But it was do able. Ice Storm , was something new (for the hardware used) and i would dare to say , that it was the most interesting stage (for me). Almost every aspect of tuning , was giving it a tad more in final score. RealBench on the other hand , almost killed all the fun of this round. It was tooo lengthy for the capabilities of the hardware. It was not easy to overcome the disappointment of the last minute failed bench session. The non-saving score was also a big minus. ... and its final score , was not the result of hardware tuning. It's software tweaking (the most) ... and i hate these kind of benchmarks. // I may have complaints about this weird competition ending time ... but all in all it was fun. I didnt have the clocks to compete in higher level. and i dont take risks (anymore) with sub-zero cooling , on old hardware , cause it's not easily replacable nowadays. At least , i think i got the highest GT2 score of all , to remember. Especially for my clocks and cooling. ... and i found , that i have a small X2 that can do 312 1/1 on mem (air-cooled). Congrats to all !!! There were some very good scores on top places !!! See you next round.

Thanks for the confirmation. At least i know i'm not crazy ... seeing things on my own. What more can i say ?

Just wanted to ask here ... Did this stage ended for all at the same time ??? For me it ended early in the morning at 2 o'clock But i see that other were submitting just a couple of hours ago ... Was there an extension ??? I would have finished my Realbench

It's a Zalman CNPS7700-CU It's much bigger than the 7000 series. Zalman CNPS7700: The New Giant of Coolers ... and it'a a pain in the @$$ , if you are using the orange mem slot's and wanna swap ram modules

Well they existed , but nothing special. Team 1300 @6-6-6-18 2T @2.45 volt and the Corsair were 1250 @5-5-5-18 2t @2.40 volt Sorry for the thread hijacking

What am i doing wrong here ? or is it a database problem ? My result doesnt show up in the competition rankings and in hardware rankings it shows as a 2X cpu. I submitted twice TASOS`s Cinebench - R11.5 score: 0.82 points with a Opteron 154 (San Diego, s939) TASOS`s Cinebench - R11.5 score: 0.82 points with a Opteron 154 (San Diego, s939)

I believe that one of the strongest fpo/batch , was the 3325A911. At least for the 4930K. I have very good air-cooled and watercooled results with this. and if i recall , der8auer had very good results also.

WoW !!!

I've done some work too Scotty. Tell me your opinion about asking the participants , to show the whole (and more maximized ... and not screenshot cut) window of the log output , as a beggining. Any other thoughts are welcome. ./ Rule reminder

I see miracles happening in some RealBench Multithreading scores. I hope this miracles are legit.

"Houston , we have a setup down" DFI NF4 SLI + Opteron 180 I've "lost" my current setup , during Realbench. I've left it run the bench , cause it takes some time ... and after an hour , when i got back to check , i found it on a black screen with blinking cursor. Shut down and new power up. System keeps restarting all over again and again. Clear cmos didnt help , neither one mem module only did. I have a bad feeling that it needs more than basic troubleshooting.

12AX7 tends to be a RealBench expert. It's better not to tell you his secret , cause he has to "kill" you afterwards

Thanks It looks nice , nothing spectacular though. It's an old one , i had in a box ... and never really tested till now.

From what i know , things are clear about the rules HWBOT 3DMark Ice Storm Benchmark Validation Regulations